Results of Endoscopic Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Biliary Obstruction in Patients with Self-Expanding Metal Stents.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s10620-025-08853-y
Lara Coutinho Machado, Bruno Costa Martins, Marcelo Simas de Lima, Sebastian Geiger, Luciano Lenz, Gustavo Andrade de Paulo, Adriana Safatle-Ribeiro, Ulysses Ribeiro, Fauze Maluf-Filho
{"title":"Results of Endoscopic Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Biliary Obstruction in Patients with Self-Expanding Metal Stents.","authors":"Lara Coutinho Machado, Bruno Costa Martins, Marcelo Simas de Lima, Sebastian Geiger, Luciano Lenz, Gustavo Andrade de Paulo, Adriana Safatle-Ribeiro, Ulysses Ribeiro, Fauze Maluf-Filho","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-08853-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Endoscopic biliary drainage with placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) is the preferred palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Recent advances in the treatment have prolonged survival, thus, increasing the chance of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after SEMS placement. The aim of this study was to compare different endoscopic approaches in patients with a SEMS and RBO, regarding clinical success and time to RBO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all patients with a SEMS placed because of malignant biliary strictures who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between January 2011 and December 2018. We evaluated the results of different endoscopic interventions to RBO, including insertion of a new SEMS, stent cleaning, and insertion of a plastic stent (PS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2011 to December 2018, 70 (22.4%) patients developed RBO requiring endoscopic reintervention (n = 105 sessions). From the 105 ERCPs, technical success, clinical success, and adverse events rates were 91,4%, 71,8%, and 7,8%, respectively. Younger age (OR = 1.11 95%CI: 1.03-1.19) and the finding of a patent SEMS (OR = 0.17 95%CI: 0.04-0.08) were predictors of clinical failure (P = 0.006 and P = 0.024, respectively). The mean patency time (in days) after endoscopic reintervention was greater for SEMSs than for PSs (417.2 [95% CI: 250.0-584.4] vs 175.2 [95% CI: 124.0-226.5], P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Correct identification and treatment of the causal factor of RBO typically lead to technical and clinical success. Placement of a second SEMS provides longer patency compared to a plastic stent if ingrowth (overgrowth) occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1223-1232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-08853-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Endoscopic biliary drainage with placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) is the preferred palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Recent advances in the treatment have prolonged survival, thus, increasing the chance of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after SEMS placement. The aim of this study was to compare different endoscopic approaches in patients with a SEMS and RBO, regarding clinical success and time to RBO.

Methods: This retrospective study included all patients with a SEMS placed because of malignant biliary strictures who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between January 2011 and December 2018. We evaluated the results of different endoscopic interventions to RBO, including insertion of a new SEMS, stent cleaning, and insertion of a plastic stent (PS).

Results: From January 2011 to December 2018, 70 (22.4%) patients developed RBO requiring endoscopic reintervention (n = 105 sessions). From the 105 ERCPs, technical success, clinical success, and adverse events rates were 91,4%, 71,8%, and 7,8%, respectively. Younger age (OR = 1.11 95%CI: 1.03-1.19) and the finding of a patent SEMS (OR = 0.17 95%CI: 0.04-0.08) were predictors of clinical failure (P = 0.006 and P = 0.024, respectively). The mean patency time (in days) after endoscopic reintervention was greater for SEMSs than for PSs (417.2 [95% CI: 250.0-584.4] vs 175.2 [95% CI: 124.0-226.5], P = 0.002).

Conclusions: Correct identification and treatment of the causal factor of RBO typically lead to technical and clinical success. Placement of a second SEMS provides longer patency compared to a plastic stent if ingrowth (overgrowth) occurs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下治疗自扩张金属支架复发性恶性胆道梗阻的疗效观察。
背景和目的:内镜下胆道引流加放置自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)是恶性胆道梗阻的首选姑息性治疗方法。最近的治疗进展延长了生存期,因此增加了SEMS放置后复发胆道梗阻(RBO)的机会。本研究的目的是比较SEMS和RBO患者的不同内镜入路,关于临床成功率和RBO的时间。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2011年1月至2018年12月期间因恶性胆道狭窄而放置SEMS的所有内窥镜逆行胆管造影患者。我们评估了不同内镜干预RBO的结果,包括插入新的SEMS,支架清洗和插入塑料支架(PS)。结果:2011年1月至2018年12月,70例(22.4%)患者发生RBO,需要内镜下再干预(n = 105次)。从105个ercp中,技术成功率、临床成功率和不良事件发生率分别为91.4%、71.8%和7.8%。年龄较小(OR = 1.11 95%CI: 1.03-1.19)和发现专利SEMS (OR = 0.17 95%CI: 0.04-0.08)是临床失败的预测因素(P分别= 0.006和P = 0.024)。内镜下再干预后,SEMSs患者的平均通畅时间(以天为单位)大于psss患者(417.2 [95% CI: 250.0-584.4] vs 175.2 [95% CI: 124.0-226.5], P = 0.002)。结论:正确识别和治疗RBO的病因通常会导致技术和临床的成功。如果发生长入(过度生长),放置第二个SEMS比塑料支架提供更长的通畅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Nurse-Patient Mutuality on Self-Care Behaviors in Adults Living with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Impact of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt on Waitlist and Post-transplant Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates. Abdominal Distension and Constipation as the Initial Presentation of Pneumatosis Cystoides Intestinalis. Outcomes of Spiral Versus Conventional Double Pigtail Plastic Stents in Permanent Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis. Retraction Note: From Surgery to Strength: The Case for Mental Health Integration in Ileostomy Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1