Higher bone mineral density at six years of age in very preterm-born infants fed human milk compared to formula feeding. A secondary analysis of an RCT.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s00431-024-05935-3
Line H Toftlund, Signe Sparre Beck-Nielsen, Lone Agertoft, Susanne Halken, Gitte Zachariassen
{"title":"Higher bone mineral density at six years of age in very preterm-born infants fed human milk compared to formula feeding. A secondary analysis of an RCT.","authors":"Line H Toftlund, Signe Sparre Beck-Nielsen, Lone Agertoft, Susanne Halken, Gitte Zachariassen","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05935-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In very preterm-born infants, nutritional intake is important to reduce the risk of severe metabolic bone disease including the risk of a lower bone mineral density (BMD). The aim of this study was to evaluate bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD (measured as BMC per bone area (BA)) at six years of age in very preterm-born infants fed different diets post-discharge. Data on this topic so far is insufficient, and with this study we aim to supply more useful data. A prospective follow-up study of 281 children born very preterm (gestational age ≤ 32 + 0 weeks) and enrolled in a multicentre RCT on post-discharge nutrition. Infants fed human milk (HM) were randomised respectively to be fed unfortified HM (UHM) or fortified human milk (FHM) from hospital discharge to four months' corrected age. Those not fed HM received a preterm formula (PF). At six years of age, BMD and BMC in all the children were established by means of a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan (Lunar Prodigy) and adjusted for sex, age, and anthropometrics. A total of 192 very preterm-born children (59 fed UHM, 67 FHM and 66 PF) had a DXA scan performed at median 6 (5.8-8.3) years of age. No significant difference was found comparing UHM and FHM according to height, weight, BA, BMC, and BMD at six years of age. However, a multiple regression analysis showed significantly improved BMD in breastfed children compared to PF-fed children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fortified compared to non-fortified human milk post-discharge did not have an impact on BMD at 6 years of age in very preterm-born infants. Breastfed children demonstrated higher BMD than formula-fed children.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Adequate nutritional intake is important to improve growth and to reduce the risk of severe bone disease in very preterm born infants. • Bone mineralization is attained later in preterm born infants compared to term born infants.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• Feeding human milk with fortification compared to non-fortified human milk did not improve bone mineral density in children born very preterm in this follow-up study at six years of age. • Feeding human milk compared to formula was associated with increased BMD at six years of age among very preterm born infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 2","pages":"160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05935-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In very preterm-born infants, nutritional intake is important to reduce the risk of severe metabolic bone disease including the risk of a lower bone mineral density (BMD). The aim of this study was to evaluate bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD (measured as BMC per bone area (BA)) at six years of age in very preterm-born infants fed different diets post-discharge. Data on this topic so far is insufficient, and with this study we aim to supply more useful data. A prospective follow-up study of 281 children born very preterm (gestational age ≤ 32 + 0 weeks) and enrolled in a multicentre RCT on post-discharge nutrition. Infants fed human milk (HM) were randomised respectively to be fed unfortified HM (UHM) or fortified human milk (FHM) from hospital discharge to four months' corrected age. Those not fed HM received a preterm formula (PF). At six years of age, BMD and BMC in all the children were established by means of a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan (Lunar Prodigy) and adjusted for sex, age, and anthropometrics. A total of 192 very preterm-born children (59 fed UHM, 67 FHM and 66 PF) had a DXA scan performed at median 6 (5.8-8.3) years of age. No significant difference was found comparing UHM and FHM according to height, weight, BA, BMC, and BMD at six years of age. However, a multiple regression analysis showed significantly improved BMD in breastfed children compared to PF-fed children.

Conclusions: Fortified compared to non-fortified human milk post-discharge did not have an impact on BMD at 6 years of age in very preterm-born infants. Breastfed children demonstrated higher BMD than formula-fed children.

What is known: • Adequate nutritional intake is important to improve growth and to reduce the risk of severe bone disease in very preterm born infants. • Bone mineralization is attained later in preterm born infants compared to term born infants.

What is new: • Feeding human milk with fortification compared to non-fortified human milk did not improve bone mineral density in children born very preterm in this follow-up study at six years of age. • Feeding human milk compared to formula was associated with increased BMD at six years of age among very preterm born infants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
期刊最新文献
Nirsevimab effectiveness on paediatric emergency visits for RSV bronchiolitis: a test-negative design study. Pediatric head and neck sarcomas: a retrospective study from a national tertiary referral center. Incidence of and factors associated with hypophosphatemia in children and adolescents receiving cancer treatment: a single-center, retrospective study. Developmental functional brain network abnormalities in autism spectrum disorder comorbid with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. M-mode measurement of diaphragm excursion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1