Drainage from intentional extramacular holes after internal limiting membrane insertion to treat macular hole retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY International Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s10792-025-03406-8
Zhijian Huang, Qin Ding, Xiao Chen, Li Zhu, Ying Yan, Miao Zeng, Cheng Hu, Nian Xiang
{"title":"Drainage from intentional extramacular holes after internal limiting membrane insertion to treat macular hole retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes.","authors":"Zhijian Huang, Qin Ding, Xiao Chen, Li Zhu, Ying Yan, Miao Zeng, Cheng Hu, Nian Xiang","doi":"10.1007/s10792-025-03406-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to evaluate the effect of drainage from intentional extramacular holes after internal limiting membrane insertion to treat macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) in highly myopic eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective, observational, and comparative case series that included 25 consecutive highly myopic eyes with MHRD. All eyes underwent standard 23-gauge vitrectomy, inverted internal limiting membrane insertion into the macular hole, subretinal fluid drainage from an intentionally created extramacular retinal hole, and tamponade with either silicone oil (SO group, n = 13) or perfluoropropane (C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> group, n = 12). A facedown position was maintained for 1 week postoperatively. The anatomic and functional outcomes were compared between two groups at the endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the retinal reattachment rate between the SO and C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> groups (100% and 91.67%, P = 0.48). The macular hole closure rates were 92.31% in the SO group and 100% in the C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> group (P = 0.52). The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 2.18 ± 0.60 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution(logMAR) preoperatively to 1.11 ± 0.36 logMAR (P < 0.01) in the SO group and from 2.20 ± 0.61 to 1.29 ± 0.50 (P < 0.01) in the C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> group at the endpoint. There was no significant difference in BCVA improvement between the two groups (P = 0.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The drainage technique from intentional extramacular holes after internal limiting membrane insertion is an effective treatment for MHRD in highly myopic eyes, regardless of whether silicone oil or gas is used as a tamponade.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03406-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is to evaluate the effect of drainage from intentional extramacular holes after internal limiting membrane insertion to treat macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) in highly myopic eyes.

Methods: This study is a retrospective, observational, and comparative case series that included 25 consecutive highly myopic eyes with MHRD. All eyes underwent standard 23-gauge vitrectomy, inverted internal limiting membrane insertion into the macular hole, subretinal fluid drainage from an intentionally created extramacular retinal hole, and tamponade with either silicone oil (SO group, n = 13) or perfluoropropane (C3F8 group, n = 12). A facedown position was maintained for 1 week postoperatively. The anatomic and functional outcomes were compared between two groups at the endpoint.

Results: There was no significant difference in the retinal reattachment rate between the SO and C3F8 groups (100% and 91.67%, P = 0.48). The macular hole closure rates were 92.31% in the SO group and 100% in the C3F8 group (P = 0.52). The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 2.18 ± 0.60 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution(logMAR) preoperatively to 1.11 ± 0.36 logMAR (P < 0.01) in the SO group and from 2.20 ± 0.61 to 1.29 ± 0.50 (P < 0.01) in the C3F8 group at the endpoint. There was no significant difference in BCVA improvement between the two groups (P = 0.37).

Conclusion: The drainage technique from intentional extramacular holes after internal limiting membrane insertion is an effective treatment for MHRD in highly myopic eyes, regardless of whether silicone oil or gas is used as a tamponade.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
期刊最新文献
The role of triglyceride-glucose index in central retinal artery occlusion. Clinico-tomographic-pathological correlation in nodulo-ulcerative ocular surface squamous neoplasia: a study of 16 cases. Exploring the efficacy and safety of neuroprotective agents in optic neuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Agreement between Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Sirius®) and anterior-segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (ANTERİON®) devices for corneal high order aberrations in keratoconic and healthy eyes. Exploring the immunological underpinnings of allergic conjunctivitis: the role of CD4 + T Cells and SLAM expression in ocular surface disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1