Impact of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on restless legs syndrome in patients with coexistent obstructive sleep apnea: A qualitative systematic review

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111075
Narat Srivali , Charat Thongprayoon , Wisit Cheungpasitporn , Andrey Zinchuk , Brian B. Koo
{"title":"Impact of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on restless legs syndrome in patients with coexistent obstructive sleep apnea: A qualitative systematic review","authors":"Narat Srivali ,&nbsp;Charat Thongprayoon ,&nbsp;Wisit Cheungpasitporn ,&nbsp;Andrey Zinchuk ,&nbsp;Brian B. Koo","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repetitive episodes of complete or partial upper airway collapse during sleep. Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sleep-related movement disorder characterized by an uncomfortable urge to move the legs, especially during inactivity and evenings. Both OSA and RLS are common with significant overlap: RLS is present in up to 36% of those with OSA. Treatment of OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy may influence RLS outcomes. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the impact of CPAP therapy on RLS symptoms and RLS medication usage in individuals with both OSA and RLS.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to December 7, 2024. The outcomes of interest were the improvement in RLS symptom severity, as measured by standardized scales such as the International RLS Study Group RLS Severity Scale (IRLS), and changes in the usage of RLS medications. The review included clinical trials and observational studies. Inclusion criteria were: studies with a control group or comparison period before CPAP usage, adult participants diagnosed with OSA and RLS, measurements of RLS severity using standardized scales such as the IRLS, and reports on medication usage before and after CPAP therapy. Data extraction included study characteristics, participant demographics, exposure and outcome measurements, and adjusted effect estimates. Exclusion criteria included non-primary research articles such as reviews, editorials, commentaries, letters, studies without standardized assessments of RLS symptoms, and non-English articles. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale (NOS), and the risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024550240).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search identified 2,046 articles, with 291 undergoing full-text review, and three studies (3 observational, 0 RCTs) meeting the inclusion criteria, which included 479 patients. CPAP therapy was associated with improvements in RLS symptoms and a reduction in medication usage among patients with coexistent RLS and OSA. The magnitude of these effects varied, with some studies reporting significant improvements while others showed probable changes. The variability in results can be attributed to differences in study designs, sample sizes, and adjustments for confounding factors. These factors highlight the need for more rigorous research to evaluate the benefits of CPAP therapy in patients with coexistent RLS and OSA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CPAP therapy appears beneficial for improving RLS symptoms and reducing medication usage in patients with coexistent OSA and RLS. However, further research with standardized diagnostic and treatment criteria, larger sample sizes, and robust adjustment for confounding factors is necessary to confirm these findings and better understand the underlying mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 111075"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825000475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repetitive episodes of complete or partial upper airway collapse during sleep. Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sleep-related movement disorder characterized by an uncomfortable urge to move the legs, especially during inactivity and evenings. Both OSA and RLS are common with significant overlap: RLS is present in up to 36% of those with OSA. Treatment of OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy may influence RLS outcomes. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the impact of CPAP therapy on RLS symptoms and RLS medication usage in individuals with both OSA and RLS.

Method

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to December 7, 2024. The outcomes of interest were the improvement in RLS symptom severity, as measured by standardized scales such as the International RLS Study Group RLS Severity Scale (IRLS), and changes in the usage of RLS medications. The review included clinical trials and observational studies. Inclusion criteria were: studies with a control group or comparison period before CPAP usage, adult participants diagnosed with OSA and RLS, measurements of RLS severity using standardized scales such as the IRLS, and reports on medication usage before and after CPAP therapy. Data extraction included study characteristics, participant demographics, exposure and outcome measurements, and adjusted effect estimates. Exclusion criteria included non-primary research articles such as reviews, editorials, commentaries, letters, studies without standardized assessments of RLS symptoms, and non-English articles. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale (NOS), and the risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024550240).

Results

The search identified 2,046 articles, with 291 undergoing full-text review, and three studies (3 observational, 0 RCTs) meeting the inclusion criteria, which included 479 patients. CPAP therapy was associated with improvements in RLS symptoms and a reduction in medication usage among patients with coexistent RLS and OSA. The magnitude of these effects varied, with some studies reporting significant improvements while others showed probable changes. The variability in results can be attributed to differences in study designs, sample sizes, and adjustments for confounding factors. These factors highlight the need for more rigorous research to evaluate the benefits of CPAP therapy in patients with coexistent RLS and OSA.

Conclusion

CPAP therapy appears beneficial for improving RLS symptoms and reducing medication usage in patients with coexistent OSA and RLS. However, further research with standardized diagnostic and treatment criteria, larger sample sizes, and robust adjustment for confounding factors is necessary to confirm these findings and better understand the underlying mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续气道正压治疗对伴有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的不宁腿综合征患者的影响:一项定性系统评价。
梗阻性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的特点是在睡眠中反复发作完全或部分上呼吸道塌陷。不宁腿综合征(RLS)是一种与睡眠有关的运动障碍,其特征是腿部不舒服的冲动,特别是在不活动和晚上。OSA和RLS都很常见,且有明显的重叠:高达36%的OSA患者存在RLS。持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗OSA可能会影响RLS的预后。我们进行了一项系统综述,以评估CPAP治疗对OSA和RLS患者的RLS症状和RLS药物使用的影响。方法:在MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库和Cochrane系统评价数据库中检索自成立至2024年12月7日的文献。我们关注的结果是RLS症状严重程度的改善,通过标准化量表如国际RLS研究组RLS严重程度量表(IRLS)来测量,以及RLS药物使用的变化。该综述包括临床试验和观察性研究。纳入标准为:使用CPAP前的对照组或比较期研究,诊断为OSA和RLS的成年参与者,使用标准化量表(如IRLS)测量RLS严重程度的研究,以及CPAP治疗前后的药物使用报告。数据提取包括研究特征、参与者人口统计、暴露和结果测量,以及调整后的效果估计。排除标准包括非主要研究文章,如综述、社论、评论、信函、没有对RLS症状进行标准化评估的研究和非英语文章。纳入研究的质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量量表(NOS)进行评估,偏倚风险采用ROBINS-I工具进行评估。该系统评价已在PROSPERO注册(ID: CRD42024550240)。结果:检索到2046篇文章,其中291篇进行了全文综述,3项研究(3项观察性研究,0项随机对照试验)符合纳入标准,共纳入479例患者。CPAP治疗与RLS和OSA共存患者的症状改善和药物使用减少相关。这些影响的程度各不相同,一些研究报告显着改善,而另一些则显示可能的变化。结果的可变性可归因于研究设计、样本量和混杂因素调整的差异。这些因素突出表明,需要更严格的研究来评估CPAP治疗对嗜睡综合征和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停共存患者的益处。结论:CPAP治疗可改善阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和睡眠睡动症共存患者的症状,减少药物用量。然而,有必要进一步研究标准化的诊断和治疗标准,更大的样本量,并对混杂因素进行强有力的调整,以证实这些发现,并更好地了解潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
期刊最新文献
Ventral parietal cortex contributions to episodic memory precision. A randomized, double blinded, pilot trial to compare the safety and efficacy of sodium chloride and sodium acetate combination intravenous fluids in acute stroke patients. Patient-centered care for postoperative reintubation after posterior occipitocervical fusion: a retrospective cohort study. Primary leptomeningeal medulloblastoma presenting with occipitalgia. Critical radiographic findings and medical comorbidities in the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1