Leveraging Model-Based Simulations to Optimize Extended Dosing of Leuprolide 6-Month Intramuscular Depot Formulation.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s13318-024-00932-1
Li-Feng Hsu
{"title":"Leveraging Model-Based Simulations to Optimize Extended Dosing of Leuprolide 6-Month Intramuscular Depot Formulation.","authors":"Li-Feng Hsu","doi":"10.1007/s13318-024-00932-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>A gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist such as leuprolide is widely used to achieve sustained suppression of testosterone levels, which play a critical role in the treatment of prostate cancer. Recent advances in drug delivery systems have led to the development of long-acting depot formulations, such as the 6-month intramuscular (IM) leuprolide formulation, which aim to simplify dosing and improve convenience for both patients and healthcare providers. Exploring extended dosing intervals for such formulations represents a promising approach to further optimize treatment regimens, potentially balancing efficacy with patient-centered care. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of various extended dosing regimens of the leuprolide 6-month IM depot formulation for prostate cancer treatment. The primary objective was to assess whether extended dosing intervals could maintain testosterone concentrations below the castrate threshold of < 0.5 ng/ml and < 0.2 ng/ml in over 90% of subjects, as outlined in regulatory criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized a previously published pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to simulate the testosterone suppression profiles for different extended dosing regimens, including every 6 months (Q6M), 7 months (Q7M), 8 months (Q8M), 9 months (Q9M), 10 months (Q10M), 11 months (Q11M), and 12 months (Q12M). The simulations were carried out with 1000 virtual subjects. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to account for variability in baseline testosterone levels and fraction of drug absorbed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The simulation results indicated that extending the dosing interval from Q6M to Q8M could ensure that over 90% of subjects maintain testosterone concentrations below 0.2 ng/ml. Similarly, extending the dosing interval to Q9M would keep testosterone concentrations below 0.5 ng/ml in over 90% of subjects. The sensitivity analyses confirmed that these extended dosing regimens consistently achieved and maintained target testosterone levels across various scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings support the feasibility of extending the dosing intervals for the leuprolide 6-month IM depot formulation beyond the label-recommended 6 months. Specifically, the Q8M and Q9M regimens emerged as viable candidates for further clinical evaluation, offering potential benefits in reducing injection frequency while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Further clinical studies are necessary to confirm the long-term efficacy of these extended dosing regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":11939,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":"139-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-024-00932-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: A gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist such as leuprolide is widely used to achieve sustained suppression of testosterone levels, which play a critical role in the treatment of prostate cancer. Recent advances in drug delivery systems have led to the development of long-acting depot formulations, such as the 6-month intramuscular (IM) leuprolide formulation, which aim to simplify dosing and improve convenience for both patients and healthcare providers. Exploring extended dosing intervals for such formulations represents a promising approach to further optimize treatment regimens, potentially balancing efficacy with patient-centered care. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of various extended dosing regimens of the leuprolide 6-month IM depot formulation for prostate cancer treatment. The primary objective was to assess whether extended dosing intervals could maintain testosterone concentrations below the castrate threshold of < 0.5 ng/ml and < 0.2 ng/ml in over 90% of subjects, as outlined in regulatory criteria.

Methods: The study utilized a previously published pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to simulate the testosterone suppression profiles for different extended dosing regimens, including every 6 months (Q6M), 7 months (Q7M), 8 months (Q8M), 9 months (Q9M), 10 months (Q10M), 11 months (Q11M), and 12 months (Q12M). The simulations were carried out with 1000 virtual subjects. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to account for variability in baseline testosterone levels and fraction of drug absorbed.

Results: The simulation results indicated that extending the dosing interval from Q6M to Q8M could ensure that over 90% of subjects maintain testosterone concentrations below 0.2 ng/ml. Similarly, extending the dosing interval to Q9M would keep testosterone concentrations below 0.5 ng/ml in over 90% of subjects. The sensitivity analyses confirmed that these extended dosing regimens consistently achieved and maintained target testosterone levels across various scenarios.

Conclusion: The findings support the feasibility of extending the dosing intervals for the leuprolide 6-month IM depot formulation beyond the label-recommended 6 months. Specifically, the Q8M and Q9M regimens emerged as viable candidates for further clinical evaluation, offering potential benefits in reducing injection frequency while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Further clinical studies are necessary to confirm the long-term efficacy of these extended dosing regimens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal focuses mainly on new and emerging diagnostic and treatment options, protocols and molecular and cellular basis of disease pathogenesis, new technologies, in liver and biliary sciences. Hepatology International publishes original research articles related to clinical care and basic research; review articles; consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment; invited editorials, and controversies in contemporary issues. The journal does not publish case reports.
期刊最新文献
Development of a Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Quantitative Interpretation of Transdermal Drug Delivery of Rotigotine, a Dopamine Agonist for Treating Parkinson's Disease. Determination of Intrinsic Clearance and Fraction Unbound in Human Liver Microsomes and In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation of Human Hepatic Clearance for Marketed Central Nervous System Drugs. Herb-Drug Interaction of Total Glucosides of Paeony and Tripterygium Glycoside with Celecoxib in Beagle Dogs by UPLC-MS/MS. Leveraging Model-Based Simulations to Optimize Extended Dosing of Leuprolide 6-Month Intramuscular Depot Formulation. Dosage Recommendations for Off-label Use of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Pediatric Patients with Thalassemia Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Approach Based on Population Pharmacokinetic Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1