Radial Artery Thrombosis and Associated Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing Radial Coronary Angiography.

IF 2.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart International Pub Date : 2024-10-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17925/HI.2024.18.2.1
Esra Koc Ay, Ibrahim Feyyaz Naldemir, Cem Ozde, Gulsah Akture, Seda Aytekin, Osman Kayapinar, Gürkan Karaca, Ali Kimiaei, Seyedehtina Safaei, Adnan Kaya
{"title":"Radial Artery Thrombosis and Associated Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing Radial Coronary Angiography.","authors":"Esra Koc Ay, Ibrahim Feyyaz Naldemir, Cem Ozde, Gulsah Akture, Seda Aytekin, Osman Kayapinar, Gürkan Karaca, Ali Kimiaei, Seyedehtina Safaei, Adnan Kaya","doi":"10.17925/HI.2024.18.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Radial access is considered the preferred method for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention. Radial artery thrombosis (RAT) stands out as the primary complication associated with trans-radial access. Our objective was to explore the occurrence of RAT and its associated risk factors. <b>Method:</b> A study encompassing 150 patients who underwent coronary interventions via radial access was conducted. Colour Doppler ultrasonography was used to assess proximal and distal radial flow rates 4-6 hours post-procedure. Patients diagnosed with RAT constituted the study group, while those without RAT were designated as controls. <b>Results:</b> Among the 150 patients, 20 (13.3%) developed RAT, with partial occlusions observed in 2.7% and total occlusions in 10.7%. Univariate analysis identified potential correlations between RAT and variables such as female gender, hypertension (HT), history of coronary artery disease, use of anti-thrombocyte medications, duration of compression, indication for CAG, haematocrit levels, neutrophil count, creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate. However, only HT showed a statistically significant association. Multivariate analysis confirmed HT, anti-thrombocyte drug use, duration of compression, haematocrit levels and creatinine levels as independent predictors of RAT. <b>Conclusion:</b> HT, anti-thrombocyte drug use, duration of compression, haematocrit levels and creatinine levels are identified as independent predictors of RAT. Standard pulse examination may not adequately detect RAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12836,"journal":{"name":"Heart International","volume":"18 2","pages":"37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2024.18.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radial access is considered the preferred method for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention. Radial artery thrombosis (RAT) stands out as the primary complication associated with trans-radial access. Our objective was to explore the occurrence of RAT and its associated risk factors. Method: A study encompassing 150 patients who underwent coronary interventions via radial access was conducted. Colour Doppler ultrasonography was used to assess proximal and distal radial flow rates 4-6 hours post-procedure. Patients diagnosed with RAT constituted the study group, while those without RAT were designated as controls. Results: Among the 150 patients, 20 (13.3%) developed RAT, with partial occlusions observed in 2.7% and total occlusions in 10.7%. Univariate analysis identified potential correlations between RAT and variables such as female gender, hypertension (HT), history of coronary artery disease, use of anti-thrombocyte medications, duration of compression, indication for CAG, haematocrit levels, neutrophil count, creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate. However, only HT showed a statistically significant association. Multivariate analysis confirmed HT, anti-thrombocyte drug use, duration of compression, haematocrit levels and creatinine levels as independent predictors of RAT. Conclusion: HT, anti-thrombocyte drug use, duration of compression, haematocrit levels and creatinine levels are identified as independent predictors of RAT. Standard pulse examination may not adequately detect RAT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受桡动脉冠状动脉造影患者的桡动脉血栓形成及其相关危险因素。
背景:桡动脉通路被认为是冠状动脉造影(CAG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的首选方法。桡动脉血栓形成(RAT)是与经桡动脉通路相关的主要并发症。我们的目的是探讨RAT的发生及其相关的危险因素。方法:对150例经桡动脉通道行冠状动脉介入治疗的患者进行研究。术后4-6小时彩色多普勒超声评估近端和远端桡动脉血流率。诊断为RAT的患者为研究组,未诊断为RAT的患者为对照组。结果:150例患者中,有20例(13.3%)发生RAT,部分闭塞占2.7%,完全闭塞占10.7%。单因素分析确定了RAT与以下变量之间的潜在相关性:女性性别、高血压(HT)、冠状动脉疾病史、抗血小板药物使用、压迫时间、CAG适应症、红细胞压积水平、中性粒细胞计数、肌酐水平和肾小球滤过率。然而,只有HT有统计学上显著的相关性。多因素分析证实HT、抗血小板药物使用、压迫时间、红细胞压积水平和肌酐水平是RAT的独立预测因素。结论:HT、抗血小板药物使用、压迫时间、红细胞压积水平和肌酐水平是RAT的独立预测因素。标准脉搏检查可能不能充分检测RAT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart International
Heart International Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
eHealth-supported Self-management and Telemonitoring in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. High-intensity Interval Versus Moderate-intensity Continuous Training in Heart Failure Rehabilitation: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. Imaging Inflammation: Epicardial Fat Density as an Imaging Marker of Cardiovascular Risk. Five-year Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgery in Low-risk Aortic Stenosis: Insights from the Evolut Low Risk Trial. Gut Microbiome and Cardiovascular Health: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Potential and Future Directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1