Exploring factors that influence the behavior response to novel object tests in young thoroughbred horses: investigating sex, test site and auction history.

IF 2.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2024.1478350
Lara Klitzing, Katharina Kirsch, Maria Schindler, Roswitha Merle, Gundula Hoffmann, Christa Thöne-Reineke, Mechthild Wiegard
{"title":"Exploring factors that influence the behavior response to novel object tests in young thoroughbred horses: investigating sex, test site and auction history.","authors":"Lara Klitzing, Katharina Kirsch, Maria Schindler, Roswitha Merle, Gundula Hoffmann, Christa Thöne-Reineke, Mechthild Wiegard","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2024.1478350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The novel object test is one of the three most common fear tests in veterinary science and employed in several different species. Although having been applied in several different studies in horses, it is surprising that there is no standardized test procedure available for these kinds of tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigated the performance of the novel object test on 42 young Thoroughbred horses to determine the effect of sex (mare or stallion), test sites (round pen or paddock) and whether the horses had previously participated in an auction or not on the behavior during the novel object test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Differences in horses' behavior during the novel object test were primarily attributed to the test sites. The animals showed significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) intra-individual differences in the novel object test in the round pen and in the paddock. Sex did not affect the direct interaction with the novel object. The horses that had not participated in an auction seemed to actively perceive the novel object more quickly, so that the latency to first fixation on the object was significantly shorter.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In order to obtain comparable results, it is recommended that novel object tests should be performed at the same location and under identical conditions. Furthermore, it is important to consider the individual behavior of each horse.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"11 ","pages":"1478350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1478350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The novel object test is one of the three most common fear tests in veterinary science and employed in several different species. Although having been applied in several different studies in horses, it is surprising that there is no standardized test procedure available for these kinds of tests.

Methods: This study investigated the performance of the novel object test on 42 young Thoroughbred horses to determine the effect of sex (mare or stallion), test sites (round pen or paddock) and whether the horses had previously participated in an auction or not on the behavior during the novel object test.

Results: Differences in horses' behavior during the novel object test were primarily attributed to the test sites. The animals showed significant (p < 0.05) intra-individual differences in the novel object test in the round pen and in the paddock. Sex did not affect the direct interaction with the novel object. The horses that had not participated in an auction seemed to actively perceive the novel object more quickly, so that the latency to first fixation on the object was significantly shorter.

Discussion: In order to obtain comparable results, it is recommended that novel object tests should be performed at the same location and under identical conditions. Furthermore, it is important to consider the individual behavior of each horse.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨影响年轻纯种马对新物体测试行为反应的因素:调查性别、测试地点和拍卖历史。
新对象测试是兽医学中三种最常见的恐惧测试之一,在几种不同的物种中使用。虽然已经应用于几项不同的马研究,但令人惊讶的是,这些测试没有标准化的测试程序。方法:本研究调查了42匹纯种马在新物体测试中的表现,以确定性别(母马或种马)、测试地点(圆形围栏或围场)以及马是否曾经参加过拍卖对新物体测试行为的影响。结果:马在新对象测试中的行为差异主要归因于测试地点。在圆栏和围场新物体测试中,动物个体间差异显著(p < 0.05)。性并不影响与新事物的直接互动。没有参加过拍卖的马似乎能更快地主动感知新物体,因此第一次注视物体的潜伏期明显更短。讨论:为了获得可比较的结果,建议在相同的位置和相同的条件下进行新的对象试验。此外,考虑每匹马的个体行为也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1870
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Advancing animal reproduction: Artificial Intelligence, precision technologies and reproductive biotechnologies. Differential causes of masticatory muscle disorders in dogs: a review of diagnosis, treatment and long-term management. Cerebrospinal fluid markers and magnetic resonance imaging lesion volume predicting relapse in canine meningoencephalitis of unknown origin. Editorial: Innovative nutritional technologies for sustainable ruminant farming. Species- and breed-associated heterogeneity in age-related increases in periodontal disease risk among dogs and cats based on Japanese insurance claim data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1