Which Method of the Radiologic Measurements of the Angle of Curvature in Idiopathic Scoliosis is the Most Reliable for an Inexperienced Researcher?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01307-z
Patryk Wiliński, Aleksandra Piekutin, Klementyna Dmowska, Wojciech Zawieja, Piotr Janusz
{"title":"Which Method of the Radiologic Measurements of the Angle of Curvature in Idiopathic Scoliosis is the Most Reliable for an Inexperienced Researcher?","authors":"Patryk Wiliński, Aleksandra Piekutin, Klementyna Dmowska, Wojciech Zawieja, Piotr Janusz","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01307-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the examination was to determine which of the three measurement methods Cobb (CB), Ferguson (FR), and Centroid (CN) has the best repeatability and reliability when the measurements are made by inexperienced researchers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three researchers (from the student research group) measured the angle of spine curvature on X-rays of the entire spine in standing anteroposterior view in 50 patients with severe idiopathic scoliosis qualified for surgery. Cobb, Ferguson, and Centroid methods were used. One of the researchers repeated all examinations twice at 3-week intervals. The measurements were compared with each other using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) method. Values less than 0.5 are indicative of poor reliability, values between 0.5 and 0.75 indicate moderate reliability, values between 0.75 and 0.9 indicate good reliability and values greater than 0.90 indicate excellent reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICC (inter-rater) between the researchers' measurements was 0.9387 for CB, 0.9169 for FR, and 0.9061 for CR. Whereas the ICC (intra-rater) between measurements taken by a single researcher was 0.9824 for CB, 0.9088 for FR, and 0.9546 for CR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The above results show that Cobb angle measurement method is the most reliable for measuring the curvature angle of the spine for novice researchers. Although it seems to be difficult to measure, it provides the most repeatable results.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 2","pages":"140-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01307-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the examination was to determine which of the three measurement methods Cobb (CB), Ferguson (FR), and Centroid (CN) has the best repeatability and reliability when the measurements are made by inexperienced researchers.

Methods: Three researchers (from the student research group) measured the angle of spine curvature on X-rays of the entire spine in standing anteroposterior view in 50 patients with severe idiopathic scoliosis qualified for surgery. Cobb, Ferguson, and Centroid methods were used. One of the researchers repeated all examinations twice at 3-week intervals. The measurements were compared with each other using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) method. Values less than 0.5 are indicative of poor reliability, values between 0.5 and 0.75 indicate moderate reliability, values between 0.75 and 0.9 indicate good reliability and values greater than 0.90 indicate excellent reliability.

Results: The ICC (inter-rater) between the researchers' measurements was 0.9387 for CB, 0.9169 for FR, and 0.9061 for CR. Whereas the ICC (intra-rater) between measurements taken by a single researcher was 0.9824 for CB, 0.9088 for FR, and 0.9546 for CR.

Conclusions: The above results show that Cobb angle measurement method is the most reliable for measuring the curvature angle of the spine for novice researchers. Although it seems to be difficult to measure, it provides the most repeatable results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of 1 Week Accelerated Ponseti and Standard Ponseti Technique for Management of Idiopathic Congenital Talipes Equinovarus Deformity in Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Functional Outcomes in Aseptic Humeral Shaft Nonunion Treated With Plate Osteosynthesis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Oral Versus Injectable Vitamin D Therapy for Treating Nutritional Rickets in Indian Children: A Comparative Study. Study of Factors Affecting the Clinical and Radiological Outcome in Management of Infected Non-Union of Tibia Managed with Ilizarov Ring Fixator and its Correlation with Patient-Reported Outcome: Prospective Descriptive Study. Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Factors Related to the Diagnosis and Characteristics of Selective Screening for its Detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1