Which Method of the Radiologic Measurements of the Angle of Curvature in Idiopathic Scoliosis is the Most Reliable for an Inexperienced Researcher?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01307-z
Patryk Wiliński, Aleksandra Piekutin, Klementyna Dmowska, Wojciech Zawieja, Piotr Janusz
{"title":"Which Method of the Radiologic Measurements of the Angle of Curvature in Idiopathic Scoliosis is the Most Reliable for an Inexperienced Researcher?","authors":"Patryk Wiliński, Aleksandra Piekutin, Klementyna Dmowska, Wojciech Zawieja, Piotr Janusz","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01307-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the examination was to determine which of the three measurement methods Cobb (CB), Ferguson (FR), and Centroid (CN) has the best repeatability and reliability when the measurements are made by inexperienced researchers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three researchers (from the student research group) measured the angle of spine curvature on X-rays of the entire spine in standing anteroposterior view in 50 patients with severe idiopathic scoliosis qualified for surgery. Cobb, Ferguson, and Centroid methods were used. One of the researchers repeated all examinations twice at 3-week intervals. The measurements were compared with each other using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) method. Values less than 0.5 are indicative of poor reliability, values between 0.5 and 0.75 indicate moderate reliability, values between 0.75 and 0.9 indicate good reliability and values greater than 0.90 indicate excellent reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICC (inter-rater) between the researchers' measurements was 0.9387 for CB, 0.9169 for FR, and 0.9061 for CR. Whereas the ICC (intra-rater) between measurements taken by a single researcher was 0.9824 for CB, 0.9088 for FR, and 0.9546 for CR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The above results show that Cobb angle measurement method is the most reliable for measuring the curvature angle of the spine for novice researchers. Although it seems to be difficult to measure, it provides the most repeatable results.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 2","pages":"140-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01307-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the examination was to determine which of the three measurement methods Cobb (CB), Ferguson (FR), and Centroid (CN) has the best repeatability and reliability when the measurements are made by inexperienced researchers.

Methods: Three researchers (from the student research group) measured the angle of spine curvature on X-rays of the entire spine in standing anteroposterior view in 50 patients with severe idiopathic scoliosis qualified for surgery. Cobb, Ferguson, and Centroid methods were used. One of the researchers repeated all examinations twice at 3-week intervals. The measurements were compared with each other using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) method. Values less than 0.5 are indicative of poor reliability, values between 0.5 and 0.75 indicate moderate reliability, values between 0.75 and 0.9 indicate good reliability and values greater than 0.90 indicate excellent reliability.

Results: The ICC (inter-rater) between the researchers' measurements was 0.9387 for CB, 0.9169 for FR, and 0.9061 for CR. Whereas the ICC (intra-rater) between measurements taken by a single researcher was 0.9824 for CB, 0.9088 for FR, and 0.9546 for CR.

Conclusions: The above results show that Cobb angle measurement method is the most reliable for measuring the curvature angle of the spine for novice researchers. Although it seems to be difficult to measure, it provides the most repeatable results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对于没有经验的研究人员来说,特发性脊柱侧凸弯曲角度的放射学测量方法中哪一种最可靠?
目的:检查的目的是确定哪一种测量方法Cobb (CB),弗格森(FR)和质心(CN)有最好的重复性和可靠性,当测量由没有经验的研究人员。方法:学生研究组3名研究人员对50例符合手术条件的严重特发性脊柱侧凸患者进行站立正位全脊柱x线片脊柱曲度角度测量。采用Cobb、Ferguson和Centroid方法。其中一名研究人员每隔3周重复两次所有的检查。采用类内相关系数(ICC)法对测量值进行比较。值小于0.5表示信度差,值在0.5到0.75之间表示信度中等,值在0.75到0.9之间表示信度好,值大于0.90表示信度优异。结果:研究者测量的CB、FR和CR之间的ICC (interrater)分别为0.9387、0.9169和0.9061,而单个研究者测量的CB、FR和CR之间的ICC (internal -rater)分别为0.9824、0.9088和0.9546。结论:Cobb角测量法是新手测量脊柱弯曲角最可靠的方法。虽然它似乎很难测量,但它提供了最可重复的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
期刊最新文献
Introspection and reflections on 2025 and an outlook for 2026. Old Is Gold-360° Care of the Elderly: A Commitment to Society. Indian Orthopaedics Research Landscape: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (2007-2024). Evidence-Based Interventions and Functional Outcomes for Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arthroscopic Repair of Tibial Avulsion of Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Paediatric Patients Using a Novel Physeal Sparing Pull Through Technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1