Pain Catastrophizing and Substance Misuse: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Harvard Review of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000415
Juliette A Bichon, Allen J Bailey, Stephanie Friree Ford, Victoria S Lesser, R Kathryn McHugh
{"title":"Pain Catastrophizing and Substance Misuse: A Scoping Review of the Literature.","authors":"Juliette A Bichon, Allen J Bailey, Stephanie Friree Ford, Victoria S Lesser, R Kathryn McHugh","doi":"10.1097/HRP.0000000000000415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain catastrophizing, or the interpretation of pain as unbearable or intolerable, can increase pain-related anxiety and severity. High levels of pain catastrophizing have also been linked to substance use, particularly for substances with analgesic properties. Importantly, behavioral treatments can reduce pain catastrophizing, making them promising interventions for mitigating pain-related substance use. The aim of this scoping review is to summarize literature investigating the relationship between pain catastrophizing and substance use in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature. Included articles had both a measurement of pain catastrophizing and substance use, and reported analyses characterizing the relationship between the two.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 341 abstracts identified, 47 articles met eligibility criteria. Most studies focused on people with chronic pain. Some studies also considered samples with substance use disorders (with and without chronic pain) or acute pain, and general population samples. There was generally a positive association between pain catastrophizing and substance misuse; this association was consistent across multiple samples and substances. Most studies were cross-sectional, although associations were also detected in longitudinal studies. The magnitude of associations tended to be stronger for higher severity substance use and more proximal tests of association. More longitudinal and experimental studies are needed, however, to better delineate these effects.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings indicate a consistent positive association between pain catastrophizing and substance use, highlighting the potential for interventions targeting pain catastrophizing to reduce negative substance-related consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12915,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","volume":"33 1","pages":"8-30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain catastrophizing, or the interpretation of pain as unbearable or intolerable, can increase pain-related anxiety and severity. High levels of pain catastrophizing have also been linked to substance use, particularly for substances with analgesic properties. Importantly, behavioral treatments can reduce pain catastrophizing, making them promising interventions for mitigating pain-related substance use. The aim of this scoping review is to summarize literature investigating the relationship between pain catastrophizing and substance use in adults.

Methods: We performed a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature. Included articles had both a measurement of pain catastrophizing and substance use, and reported analyses characterizing the relationship between the two.

Results: Of the 341 abstracts identified, 47 articles met eligibility criteria. Most studies focused on people with chronic pain. Some studies also considered samples with substance use disorders (with and without chronic pain) or acute pain, and general population samples. There was generally a positive association between pain catastrophizing and substance misuse; this association was consistent across multiple samples and substances. Most studies were cross-sectional, although associations were also detected in longitudinal studies. The magnitude of associations tended to be stronger for higher severity substance use and more proximal tests of association. More longitudinal and experimental studies are needed, however, to better delineate these effects.

Discussion: Findings indicate a consistent positive association between pain catastrophizing and substance use, highlighting the potential for interventions targeting pain catastrophizing to reduce negative substance-related consequences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疼痛灾难化与药物滥用:文献综述。
背景:疼痛灾难化,或将疼痛解释为无法忍受或无法忍受,会增加疼痛相关的焦虑和严重程度。高水平的疼痛灾难化也与物质使用有关,特别是对具有镇痛特性的物质。重要的是,行为治疗可以减少疼痛的灾难化,使它们成为缓解疼痛相关物质使用的有希望的干预措施。本综述的目的是总结研究成人疼痛灾难和药物使用之间关系的文献。方法:我们对同行评议的文献进行了范围审查。纳入的文章都有疼痛灾难和药物使用的测量,并报告了两者之间关系的分析。结果:纳入的341篇摘要中,47篇符合入选标准。大多数研究都集中在慢性疼痛患者身上。一些研究还考虑了物质使用障碍(有或没有慢性疼痛)或急性疼痛的样本,以及一般人群样本。疼痛灾难化与药物滥用之间普遍存在正相关;这种关联在多个样品和物质中是一致的。大多数研究是横断面的,尽管在纵向研究中也发现了关联。对于更严重的物质使用和更近距离的关联测试,关联的强度倾向于更强。然而,需要更多的纵向和实验研究来更好地描述这些影响。讨论:研究结果表明,疼痛灾难化与药物使用之间存在一致的正相关关系,强调了针对疼痛灾难化的干预措施的潜力,以减少与药物相关的负面后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Harvard Review of Psychiatry is the authoritative source for scholarly reviews and perspectives on important topics in psychiatry. Founded by the Harvard Medical School''s Department of Psychiatry, the Harvard Review of Psychiatry features review papers that summarize and synthesize the key literature in a scholarly and clinically relevant manner. Topics covered include: Schizophrenia and related disorders; Mood disorders; Personality disorders; Substance use disorders; Anxiety; Neuroscience; Psychosocial aspects of psychiatry; Ethics; Psychiatric education; and much more. In addition, a Clinical Challenges section presents a case with discussion from a panel of experts. Brief reviews are presented in topic-specific columns that include Cross-Cultural Psychiatry, History of Psychiatry, Ethics, and others.
期刊最新文献
The Long-Term Mental Health Impact of Disasters: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Epidemiological Studies. Data Disaggregation for Asian Americans: Where We Are Now. Anti-GAD65 Encephalitis: A Cryptic Case Requiring a Multidisciplinary Approach. Intravenous Haloperidol, Agitation, and the QTc: Misconceptions and Heuristics. The Efficacy of Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Compared to a Waitlist Control for Emotional Disorders in Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1