Response to initial treatment with glucocorticoids in TAFRO syndrome and implications for secondary treatment.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY International Journal of Hematology Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s12185-025-03933-1
Ryutaro Tominaga, Kento Umino, Seina Honda, Daizo Yokoyama, Atsuto Noguchi, Shuka Furuki, Shunsuke Koyama, Rui Murahashi, Hirotomo Nakashima, Kazuki Hyodo, Shin-Ichiro Kawaguchi, Yumiko Toda, Daisuke Minakata, Masahiro Ashizawa, Chihiro Yamamoto, Kaoru Hatano, Kazuya Sato, Ken Ohmine, Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara, Yoshinobu Kanda
{"title":"Response to initial treatment with glucocorticoids in TAFRO syndrome and implications for secondary treatment.","authors":"Ryutaro Tominaga, Kento Umino, Seina Honda, Daizo Yokoyama, Atsuto Noguchi, Shuka Furuki, Shunsuke Koyama, Rui Murahashi, Hirotomo Nakashima, Kazuki Hyodo, Shin-Ichiro Kawaguchi, Yumiko Toda, Daisuke Minakata, Masahiro Ashizawa, Chihiro Yamamoto, Kaoru Hatano, Kazuya Sato, Ken Ohmine, Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara, Yoshinobu Kanda","doi":"10.1007/s12185-025-03933-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of various initial treatments incorporating glucocorticoid (GC) in TAFRO syndrome (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin fibrosis, and organomegaly). Cases of TAFRO syndrome up to November 2023 were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) and resistance to GC therapy were assessed, with resistance analyzed based on the time to the next treatment or death (TTNTD). The study included 95 patients, including 5 diagnosed at our hospital. OS did not differ significantly between patients who received GC monotherapy and those who had a second-line therapy added within 2 weeks (100-day OS rate: 86.6% vs. 77.7%; p = 0.338). Moreover, 100-day OS did not differ between patients who received GC pulse therapy within 2 weeks and those who did not (77.5% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.129). In multivariate analyses, pretreatment severity score ≥ 8 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-8.50) and platelets ≥ 6.9 × 10^4/µL (HR, 2.26; 95% CI 1.01-5.02) were significantly associated with shorter TTNTD. Additional second-line or GC pulse therapy provided no advantage in the hyperacute phase. Higher severity scores and platelet values may predict resistance to GC therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13992,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-025-03933-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of various initial treatments incorporating glucocorticoid (GC) in TAFRO syndrome (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin fibrosis, and organomegaly). Cases of TAFRO syndrome up to November 2023 were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) and resistance to GC therapy were assessed, with resistance analyzed based on the time to the next treatment or death (TTNTD). The study included 95 patients, including 5 diagnosed at our hospital. OS did not differ significantly between patients who received GC monotherapy and those who had a second-line therapy added within 2 weeks (100-day OS rate: 86.6% vs. 77.7%; p = 0.338). Moreover, 100-day OS did not differ between patients who received GC pulse therapy within 2 weeks and those who did not (77.5% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.129). In multivariate analyses, pretreatment severity score ≥ 8 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-8.50) and platelets ≥ 6.9 × 10^4/µL (HR, 2.26; 95% CI 1.01-5.02) were significantly associated with shorter TTNTD. Additional second-line or GC pulse therapy provided no advantage in the hyperacute phase. Higher severity scores and platelet values may predict resistance to GC therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hematology, the official journal of the Japanese Society of Hematology, has a long history of publishing leading research in hematology. The journal comprises articles that contribute to progress in research not only in basic hematology but also in clinical hematology, aiming to cover all aspects of this field, namely, erythrocytes, leukocytes and hematopoiesis, hemostasis, thrombosis and vascular biology, hematological malignancies, transplantation, and cell therapy. The expanded [Progress in Hematology] section integrates such relevant fields as the cell biology of stem cells and cancer cells, and clinical research in inflammation, cancer, and thrombosis. Reports on results of clinical trials are also included, thus contributing to the aim of fostering communication among researchers in the growing field of modern hematology. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on modern hematology, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of asciminib in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia on hemodialysis. Real-world toxicity and efficacy of asciminib in heavily pretreated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. A case of autoimmune factor XIII deficiency due to clearance-accelerating and inhibitory anti-FXIII autoantibodies. Clinical significance of NOTCH1 and FBXW7 alterations in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Real-world effectiveness and safety of ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Japan: the Orbit study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1