Telehealth vs Clinic Postoperative Visit After Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Urogynecology Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1007/s00192-025-06070-9
Susan D Wherley, David Sheyn, Leah H Hellerstein, Hope Bauer, Jeffrey Mangel, Sarah Sears, Linda-Dalal Shiber, Robert Pollard
{"title":"Telehealth vs Clinic Postoperative Visit After Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Susan D Wherley, David Sheyn, Leah H Hellerstein, Hope Bauer, Jeffrey Mangel, Sarah Sears, Linda-Dalal Shiber, Robert Pollard","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06070-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Telehealth is becoming more common, but there is a paucity of literature investigating the role of telehealth in perioperative gynecologic care. The authors hypothesized that patients evaluated via telehealth 4 weeks after minimally invasive hysterectomy would not have lower satisfaction than patients evaluated in clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled noninferiority trial of patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy at a single academic medical center. Participants were randomized to postoperative clinic visit or telehealth visit 4 weeks after hysterectomy. After the 4-week postoperative visit, patients were sent a satisfaction questionnaire. The primary outcome was overall patient satisfaction on a 100 mm visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes were 90-day postoperative complications and unplanned events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred one patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy were identified for inclusion. Complete data were collected for 47 in the clinic group and 45 in the telehealth group. Overall postoperative visit satisfaction did not differ between groups (94.3 clinic vs. 92.0 telehealth, p = 0.47). The clinic group was significantly more likely to contact the clinic two or more times (p = 0.02); both groups were similarly likely to contact the clinic at least once (57.4% vs. 51.1%). Postoperative complications did not differ between groups, nor did unplanned clinic visits or emergency department (ED) visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative visit satisfaction of patients evaluated via telehealth was noninferior to the satisfaction of patients seen in the clinic 4 weeks after minimally invasive hysterectomy. Unplanned clinic visits and ED visits did not differ between groups, nor did 90-day postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06070-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Telehealth is becoming more common, but there is a paucity of literature investigating the role of telehealth in perioperative gynecologic care. The authors hypothesized that patients evaluated via telehealth 4 weeks after minimally invasive hysterectomy would not have lower satisfaction than patients evaluated in clinic.

Methods: This was a randomized controlled noninferiority trial of patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy at a single academic medical center. Participants were randomized to postoperative clinic visit or telehealth visit 4 weeks after hysterectomy. After the 4-week postoperative visit, patients were sent a satisfaction questionnaire. The primary outcome was overall patient satisfaction on a 100 mm visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes were 90-day postoperative complications and unplanned events.

Results: One hundred one patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy were identified for inclusion. Complete data were collected for 47 in the clinic group and 45 in the telehealth group. Overall postoperative visit satisfaction did not differ between groups (94.3 clinic vs. 92.0 telehealth, p = 0.47). The clinic group was significantly more likely to contact the clinic two or more times (p = 0.02); both groups were similarly likely to contact the clinic at least once (57.4% vs. 51.1%). Postoperative complications did not differ between groups, nor did unplanned clinic visits or emergency department (ED) visits.

Conclusions: Postoperative visit satisfaction of patients evaluated via telehealth was noninferior to the satisfaction of patients seen in the clinic 4 weeks after minimally invasive hysterectomy. Unplanned clinic visits and ED visits did not differ between groups, nor did 90-day postoperative complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
期刊最新文献
Comment on "Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Affects the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies". Does a Linear Array of Pressure Sensors Placed within the Vagina Really Measure the Ability of the Pelvic Floor to Respond to Increases in Intra-abdominal Pressure During High-Impact Activities? Enhancing Mesh-Tissue Integration in Menopausal Models Using a Platelet-Rich Plasma-Decellularized Amnion Scaffold Sandwich: A Study on Mesh Contraction, Inflammatory Infiltrate, IL-17, CD31, and Collagen Deposition. Long-Term Outcomes of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Suture Rectopexy. Response to Comment on "Short-Term Complications of Concomitant Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Rectal Prolapse Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1