Ablation of Premature Ventricular Contractions With Prepotentials Mapped Inside Coronary Cusps: When to Go Infra-Valvular?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1111/jce.16587
Youmei Shen, Lei Wang, Ning Chen, Linlin Wang, Yajun Wang, Qian Pan, Lei Li, Xiangwei Ding, Zhoushan Gu, Fei Li, Weizhu Ju, Mingfang Li, Hongwu Chen, Gang Yang, Kai Gu, Hailei Liu, Minglong Chen
{"title":"Ablation of Premature Ventricular Contractions With Prepotentials Mapped Inside Coronary Cusps: When to Go Infra-Valvular?","authors":"Youmei Shen,&nbsp;Lei Wang,&nbsp;Ning Chen,&nbsp;Linlin Wang,&nbsp;Yajun Wang,&nbsp;Qian Pan,&nbsp;Lei Li,&nbsp;Xiangwei Ding,&nbsp;Zhoushan Gu,&nbsp;Fei Li,&nbsp;Weizhu Ju,&nbsp;Mingfang Li,&nbsp;Hongwu Chen,&nbsp;Gang Yang,&nbsp;Kai Gu,&nbsp;Hailei Liu,&nbsp;Minglong Chen","doi":"10.1111/jce.16587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Discrete prepotentials (DPPs) mapped inside aortic sinuses of Valsalva (ASVs) are deemed as reliable targets for ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Nevertheless, ablation may still fail, necessitating further investigation. This study aimed to investigate the electrophysiological features and ablation approaches for PVCs with failed ablation inside ASVs, despite identified DPPs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients undergoing PVCs ablation requiring left ventricular outflow tract mapping were consecutively enrolled at six centers. Inclusion criteria comprised the presence of reproducible DPPs in ASVs and the earliest activation inside ASVs preceding the left ventricle. Patients were divided into ASV and non-ASV groups based on ablation outcomes within ASVs. Of 780 assessed patients, 40 (age 47.5 ± 19.4; 17 males) were included in the final analysis, with 10 in the non-ASV group. The interval from DPPs to QRS onset (DPP-QRS) in the ASV group significantly exceeded that in the non-ASV group (44.3 ± 6.7 ms vs. 15.0 ± 5.0 ms, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). A DPP-QRS interval &lt; 25 ms perfectly differentiated non-ASV from ASV cases. Successful ablation beneath ASVs was achieved in all non-ASV patients, despite the local potential preceding the QRS onset by only 2.3 ± 8.0 ms. In the non-ASV group, the distance between locations of targets and DPPs was 13.3 ± 4.2 mm, negatively correlated with the DPP-QRS interval (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.618, <i>p</i> = 0.007). Over a 22-month follow-up, one patient in the non-ASV group had recurrence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>DPPs mapped inside ASVs, despite being the earliest sites, do not necessarily represent PVCs targets. An infra-valvular approach is suggested with a DPP-QRS interval &lt; 25 ms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"36 4","pages":"783-793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16587","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Discrete prepotentials (DPPs) mapped inside aortic sinuses of Valsalva (ASVs) are deemed as reliable targets for ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Nevertheless, ablation may still fail, necessitating further investigation. This study aimed to investigate the electrophysiological features and ablation approaches for PVCs with failed ablation inside ASVs, despite identified DPPs.

Methods and Results

Patients undergoing PVCs ablation requiring left ventricular outflow tract mapping were consecutively enrolled at six centers. Inclusion criteria comprised the presence of reproducible DPPs in ASVs and the earliest activation inside ASVs preceding the left ventricle. Patients were divided into ASV and non-ASV groups based on ablation outcomes within ASVs. Of 780 assessed patients, 40 (age 47.5 ± 19.4; 17 males) were included in the final analysis, with 10 in the non-ASV group. The interval from DPPs to QRS onset (DPP-QRS) in the ASV group significantly exceeded that in the non-ASV group (44.3 ± 6.7 ms vs. 15.0 ± 5.0 ms, p < 0.001). A DPP-QRS interval < 25 ms perfectly differentiated non-ASV from ASV cases. Successful ablation beneath ASVs was achieved in all non-ASV patients, despite the local potential preceding the QRS onset by only 2.3 ± 8.0 ms. In the non-ASV group, the distance between locations of targets and DPPs was 13.3 ± 4.2 mm, negatively correlated with the DPP-QRS interval (R2 = 0.618, p = 0.007). Over a 22-month follow-up, one patient in the non-ASV group had recurrence.

Conclusion

DPPs mapped inside ASVs, despite being the earliest sites, do not necessarily represent PVCs targets. An infra-valvular approach is suggested with a DPP-QRS interval < 25 ms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉尖头内预电位消融室性早搏:何时去瓣下?
背景:Valsalva (asv)主动脉窦内离散预电位(DPPs)被认为是室性早搏(PVCs)消融的可靠靶点。然而,消融仍可能失败,需要进一步研究。本研究旨在探讨asv内室性早搏消融失败的电生理特征和消融方法,尽管确定了dpp。方法和结果:在6个中心连续入组行室性早搏消融需要左心室流出道测绘的患者。纳入标准包括在asv中存在可重复的DPPs,以及asv内最早在左心室之前激活。根据ASV内消融结果将患者分为ASV组和非ASV组。780例接受评估的患者中,40例(年龄47.5±19.4;17例男性纳入最终分析,10例非asv组。ASV组DPP-QRS发病间隔(DPP-QRS)明显高于非ASV组(44.3±6.7 ms vs 15.0±5.0 ms, p 2 = 0.618, p = 0.007)。在22个月的随访中,非asv组中有1例患者复发。结论:在asv内定位的dpp,尽管是最早的位点,但并不一定代表室性早搏的靶点。建议采用DPP-QRS间期的瓣下方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and Outcomes of Intravenous Lithotripsy as an Adjunct in Complex Transvenous Lead Extraction. When a Pacemaker Goes Rogue: A Case of Pitchfork Bifurcation. Efficacy and Safety of Dronedar one in Overweight and Obesity: Post Hoc Analysis of the ATHENA Trial. Progression to Higher Burden of ICM-Detected Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients. Hemodynamic Consequences and Clinical Outcomes With Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1