Left Bundle Branch Pacing Impact on QRS Amplitude in Different Pacing Voltages

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1111/jce.16584
Shengchan Wang, Jie Geng, Wen Yang, Zhixin Jiang, Xiujuan Zhou, Wanying Jiang, Shigeng Zhang, Qijun Shan
{"title":"Left Bundle Branch Pacing Impact on QRS Amplitude in Different Pacing Voltages","authors":"Shengchan Wang,&nbsp;Jie Geng,&nbsp;Wen Yang,&nbsp;Zhixin Jiang,&nbsp;Xiujuan Zhou,&nbsp;Wanying Jiang,&nbsp;Shigeng Zhang,&nbsp;Qijun Shan","doi":"10.1111/jce.16584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) emerged as a novel physiological pacing modality that improves clinical outcomes. This study aimed to explore the impact of LBBP on QRS wave amplitude (RWA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective observational study included patients with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) indication, as well as patients with QRSd &lt; 120 ms and pacemaker indication. During the procedure, when the LBBP lead reached the target site, 12-lead ECGs at baseline and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 times the pacing thresholds and 3.5 V (pacemaker default value) pacing were recorded, and RWA values were measured accordingly. The absolute values of I + aVL, II + III+ aVF, and V1 + V2 + V3 + V4 + V5 + V6 RWA were defined as X-, Y-, and Z-axis ΣRWA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 195 consecutive patients (50 CLBBB and 145 narrow QRS) were enrolled (69.7 ± 10.3 years, 52.3% male). Compared with the baseline, LBBP significantly increased X- and Y-axis ΣRWA independent of pacing voltage in CLBBB (ΔX/Y-axis 0.49 ± 0.78 mV, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001/0.61 ± 1.24 mV, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and narrow QRS group (ΔX/Y-axis 0.88 ± 0.61 mV, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001/0.91 ± 1.05 mV, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001); LBBP significantly reduced Z-axis ΣRWA in CLBBB patients (ΔZ-axis −2.64 ± 3.67 mV, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) but not in narrow QRS group (ΔZ-axis −0.14 ± 1.87 mV, <i>p</i> = 0.36). LBBP significantly improved cardiac function at 1 week of follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>LBBP significantly increased X/Y-axis ΣRWA independent of pacing voltage in CLBBB and narrow QRS patients. LBBP significantly reduced Z-axis ΣRWA in CLBBB but not in narrow QRS patients. Whether these ΣRWA changes, through enhancing whole myocardial contractility, have a synergistic effect with LBBP synchronization to further improve cardiac function remains to be investigated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"36 4","pages":"762-770"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) emerged as a novel physiological pacing modality that improves clinical outcomes. This study aimed to explore the impact of LBBP on QRS wave amplitude (RWA).

Methods

This prospective observational study included patients with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) indication, as well as patients with QRSd < 120 ms and pacemaker indication. During the procedure, when the LBBP lead reached the target site, 12-lead ECGs at baseline and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 times the pacing thresholds and 3.5 V (pacemaker default value) pacing were recorded, and RWA values were measured accordingly. The absolute values of I + aVL, II + III+ aVF, and V1 + V2 + V3 + V4 + V5 + V6 RWA were defined as X-, Y-, and Z-axis ΣRWA.

Results

A total of 195 consecutive patients (50 CLBBB and 145 narrow QRS) were enrolled (69.7 ± 10.3 years, 52.3% male). Compared with the baseline, LBBP significantly increased X- and Y-axis ΣRWA independent of pacing voltage in CLBBB (ΔX/Y-axis 0.49 ± 0.78 mV, p < 0.0001/0.61 ± 1.24 mV, p = 0.001) and narrow QRS group (ΔX/Y-axis 0.88 ± 0.61 mV, p < 0.0001/0.91 ± 1.05 mV, p < 0.0001); LBBP significantly reduced Z-axis ΣRWA in CLBBB patients (ΔZ-axis −2.64 ± 3.67 mV, p < 0.0001) but not in narrow QRS group (ΔZ-axis −0.14 ± 1.87 mV, p = 0.36). LBBP significantly improved cardiac function at 1 week of follow-up.

Conclusions

LBBP significantly increased X/Y-axis ΣRWA independent of pacing voltage in CLBBB and narrow QRS patients. LBBP significantly reduced Z-axis ΣRWA in CLBBB but not in narrow QRS patients. Whether these ΣRWA changes, through enhancing whole myocardial contractility, have a synergistic effect with LBBP synchronization to further improve cardiac function remains to be investigated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同起搏电压下左束支起搏对QRS幅值的影响。
背景:左束支起搏(LBBP)是一种新的生理起搏方式,可以改善临床结果。本研究旨在探讨LBBP对QRS波振幅(RWA)的影响。方法:本前瞻性观察研究纳入了完全左束支阻滞(CLBBB)和心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)指征患者以及QRSd患者。结果:共纳入195例连续患者(CLBBB 50例,窄QRS 145例)(69.7±10.3岁,男性52.3%)。与基线相比,LBBP显著升高CLBBB患者X轴和y轴ΣRWA与起搏电压无关(ΔX/ y轴0.49±0.78 mV, p)。结论:LBBP显著升高CLBBB和窄QRS患者X轴ΣRWA与起搏电压无关。LBBP显著降低CLBBB患者的z轴ΣRWA,但在窄QRS患者中没有。这些ΣRWA变化是否通过增强全心肌收缩力,与LBBP同步化产生协同作用,进一步改善心功能,还有待研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Substrate Modification in Persistent AF: PVI Plus Posterior Wall Isolation With and Without Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion and Mitral Isthmus Ablation. Utility of Very High Output Pace-Capture Testing for Posterior Wall Isolation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Safety and Efficacy of LockeT Suture Retention Device for Large-Bore Venous Access Closure. Novel Observations on the Precursor Arrhythmias of Ventricular Fibrillation in the Ambulatory Setting. Diagnosis, Unique Observations and Ablation of Atypical Fast-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Using an Inferolateral Left Atrial Slow Pathway: Analysis of Unique 3 Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1