Verónica Romero-Ferreiro , Lorena García-Fernández , Carmen Romero , Mónica De la Fuente , Estefanía Diaz-del Cerro , Mauro Scala , Rocío González-Soltero , Miguel A. Álvarez-Mon , Inmaculada Peñuelas-Calvo , Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez
{"title":"Impact of probiotic treatment on clinical symptom reduction in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Verónica Romero-Ferreiro , Lorena García-Fernández , Carmen Romero , Mónica De la Fuente , Estefanía Diaz-del Cerro , Mauro Scala , Rocío González-Soltero , Miguel A. Álvarez-Mon , Inmaculada Peñuelas-Calvo , Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.01.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Recent research has identified gut microbiota dysbiosis as a potential contributing factor in schizophrenia, leading to growing interest in exploring probiotics as a complementary approach to traditional antipsychotic treatments. This study aims to systematically evaluate the current evidence on the efficacy of probiotics in improving clinical symptoms of schizophrenia, offering a novel perspective into their potential role as an adjunctive strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted to review randomized clinical trials, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. A meta-analysis was also performed to assess the primary outcome, which was the impact of probiotic supplementation on clinical symptoms measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 76 studies initially identified, 5 were finally included. Regarding the symptomatology measured through the PANSS total score, the average effect was significant after the probiotic supplementation (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.608, (95% CI -1.314; −0.047), p = .035.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The synthesis of available data suggests that probiotic supplementation may effectively reduce clinical symptoms in schizophrenia. However, the limited number of studies prevents the formation of robust conclusions. Further clinical trials with more rigorous experimental designs are necessary before making definitive recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"182 ","pages":"Pages 413-420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625000585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Recent research has identified gut microbiota dysbiosis as a potential contributing factor in schizophrenia, leading to growing interest in exploring probiotics as a complementary approach to traditional antipsychotic treatments. This study aims to systematically evaluate the current evidence on the efficacy of probiotics in improving clinical symptoms of schizophrenia, offering a novel perspective into their potential role as an adjunctive strategy.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted to review randomized clinical trials, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. A meta-analysis was also performed to assess the primary outcome, which was the impact of probiotic supplementation on clinical symptoms measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).
Results
Of the 76 studies initially identified, 5 were finally included. Regarding the symptomatology measured through the PANSS total score, the average effect was significant after the probiotic supplementation (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.608, (95% CI -1.314; −0.047), p = .035.
Conclusion
The synthesis of available data suggests that probiotic supplementation may effectively reduce clinical symptoms in schizophrenia. However, the limited number of studies prevents the formation of robust conclusions. Further clinical trials with more rigorous experimental designs are necessary before making definitive recommendations.
最近的研究已经确定肠道菌群失调是精神分裂症的一个潜在因素,这使得人们对探索益生菌作为传统抗精神病治疗的补充方法越来越感兴趣。本研究旨在系统评估益生菌改善精神分裂症临床症状的现有证据,为其作为辅助治疗策略的潜在作用提供新的视角。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,对随机临床试验进行系统检索。还进行了一项荟萃分析来评估主要结果,即益生菌补充对阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)测量的临床症状的影响。结果:在最初确定的76项研究中,最终纳入了5项。对于通过PANSS总分测量的症状学,补充益生菌后的平均效果显著(标准化平均差[SMD] = -0.608, (95% CI -1.314;-0.047), p = 0.035。结论:综合现有资料,补充益生菌可有效减轻精神分裂症患者的临床症状。然而,由于研究数量有限,无法得出可靠的结论。在提出明确的建议之前,有必要进行更严格的实验设计的进一步临床试验。
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research:
(1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors;
(2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology;
(3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;