Safe access to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous periumbilical incsions: new approach to avoid entry related bowel injury.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s00423-025-03624-9
Mostafa Seif, Mohamed Mourad, Mostafa Refaie Elkeleny, Mohamed Wael
{"title":"Safe access to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous periumbilical incsions: new approach to avoid entry related bowel injury.","authors":"Mostafa Seif, Mohamed Mourad, Mostafa Refaie Elkeleny, Mohamed Wael","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03624-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with prior abdominal surgeries are at higher risk of intra-peritoneal adhesions near the trocar entry site, increasing the likelihood of organ injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study evaluates a novel technique where the epigastric trocar is inserted first, after creating pneumoperitoneum, to allow safe dissection of adhesions under direct vision before placing the umbilical trocar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 244 patients with symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease and a history of previous abdominal surgeries extending to the umbilicus. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: Group I (n = 98) underwent traditional umbilical trocar-first LC using the Hasson technique, while Group II (n = 146) received LC using the epigastric trocar-first approach. Operative time, complications, and conversion rates were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the demographics between both groups. The epigastric trocar-first approach significantly reduced total operative time (41.6 ± 7.7 min vs. 46.8 ± 8.8 min, p = 0.031) and small bowel injury rates (p = 0.006). Otherwise, intraoperative complications were comparable. Conversion to open surgery was lower in Group II (2.1% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.012). Postoperative pain at 6 h was significantly lower in Group II (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The epigastric trocar-first approach, offers a safer alternative for patients with prior abdominal surgeries when undergoing LC. This approach is safe; minimizes bowel injury risk, reduces conversion rates, and enhances patient recovery. This approach may also be beneficial in other laparoscopic procedures requiring safe entry in patients with prior abdominal surgeries. Further studies are recommended to validate its broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03624-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with prior abdominal surgeries are at higher risk of intra-peritoneal adhesions near the trocar entry site, increasing the likelihood of organ injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study evaluates a novel technique where the epigastric trocar is inserted first, after creating pneumoperitoneum, to allow safe dissection of adhesions under direct vision before placing the umbilical trocar.

Methods: This prospective study included 244 patients with symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease and a history of previous abdominal surgeries extending to the umbilicus. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: Group I (n = 98) underwent traditional umbilical trocar-first LC using the Hasson technique, while Group II (n = 146) received LC using the epigastric trocar-first approach. Operative time, complications, and conversion rates were analyzed.

Results: There was no significant difference in the demographics between both groups. The epigastric trocar-first approach significantly reduced total operative time (41.6 ± 7.7 min vs. 46.8 ± 8.8 min, p = 0.031) and small bowel injury rates (p = 0.006). Otherwise, intraoperative complications were comparable. Conversion to open surgery was lower in Group II (2.1% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.012). Postoperative pain at 6 h was significantly lower in Group II (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: The epigastric trocar-first approach, offers a safer alternative for patients with prior abdominal surgeries when undergoing LC. This approach is safe; minimizes bowel injury risk, reduces conversion rates, and enhances patient recovery. This approach may also be beneficial in other laparoscopic procedures requiring safe entry in patients with prior abdominal surgeries. Further studies are recommended to validate its broader clinical application.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先前有脐周切口的患者安全进入腹腔镜胆囊切除术:避免进入性肠损伤的新途径。
背景:既往腹部手术的患者在套管针进入部位附近发生腹膜内粘连的风险较高,增加了腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中器官损伤的可能性。本研究评估了一种新技术,即在形成气腹后首先插入上腹部套管针,以便在放置脐带套管针之前在直视下安全剥离粘连。方法:这项前瞻性研究包括244例有症状的无并发症的胆结石疾病,既往腹部手术史延伸至脐。患者被随机分为两组:I组(n = 98)采用Hasson技术进行传统的脐套管针先行LC, II组(n = 146)采用上腹部套管针先行入路进行LC。分析手术时间、并发症及转换率。结果:两组患者人口统计学差异无统计学意义。上腹套管针先入路可显著减少总手术时间(41.6±7.7 min vs 46.8±8.8 min, p = 0.031)和小肠损伤发生率(p = 0.006)。此外,术中并发症具有可比性。II组转为开放手术的发生率较低(2.1% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.012)。II组术后6 h疼痛明显减轻(p = 0.001)。结论:上腹套管针先行入路为既往腹部手术患者行LC提供了更安全的选择。这种方法是安全的;减少肠损伤风险,降低转换率,提高患者康复。这种方法也可能有利于其他需要安全进入既往腹部手术患者的腹腔镜手术。建议进一步研究以验证其更广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Modified Ulnar Metaphyseal Wedge Osteotomy in Treating Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Comparative Clinical Study. Accelerated enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery with early discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Personalized 3D surgical planning in liver transplantation: A new era in preoperative assessment and management of vascular and biliary complications. Is surgery with curative intent feasible in old and very old patients with non-small cell lung cancer? - Experience of a certified lung cancer center over one decade. Minimally invasive management of chronic pleural empyema in non-expandable lung: a systematic review of tunneled pleural catheter use as a surgical alternative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1