Changes in Out-of-Pocket Drug Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia Under the Inflation Reduction Act: A Simulation Study

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.008
Yingying Zhu PhD , Natalia Olchanski PhD , Karen M. Freund MD, MPH , Joshua T. Cohen PhD , Peter J. Neumann ScD , Pei-Jung Lin PhD
{"title":"Changes in Out-of-Pocket Drug Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia Under the Inflation Reduction Act: A Simulation Study","authors":"Yingying Zhu PhD ,&nbsp;Natalia Olchanski PhD ,&nbsp;Karen M. Freund MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Joshua T. Cohen PhD ,&nbsp;Peter J. Neumann ScD ,&nbsp;Pei-Jung Lin PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We investigated how the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) Medicare Part D benefit redesign may reduce out-of-pocket (OOP) drug expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries with dementia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) linked with Medicare claims, we simulated post-redesign OOP drug spending by applying the 2025 prescription drug cost-sharing rules to each beneficiary’s pre-redesign Part D medication utilization for 2016, adjusting for inflation. Our study population comprised HRS respondents aged 65 and older in 2016, enrolled in Medicare fee for service, with at least one Part D drug claim in 2016, and diagnosed with dementia between 2000 and 2016 (n = 1677). We compared pre-redesign and post-redesign annual OOP drug expenditures stratified by: (1) low-income subsidy (LIS) eligibility status; (2) household income among non-LIS beneficiaries; (3) comorbidity count, and 4) cognitive impairment severity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After the redesign, we project average annual OOP drug expenditures among LIS beneficiaries with dementia to decrease from $56 to $25—representing a $31, or 55%, reduction. In contrast, among non-LIS beneficiaries, average OOP drug expenditures is projected to decrease from $772 to $576, a $196, or 25% reduction. We project the reduction in OOP drug expenditures to be greater among beneficiaries with 6 to 8 comorbidities (45%) than among beneficiaries with fewer comorbidities (21%-26%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Inflation Reduction Act Medicare Part D benefit redesign will reduce OOP drug spending for beneficiaries with dementia, resulting in potentially marked savings not only for low-income beneficiaries and beneficiaries with a high comorbidity burden but also for higher-income beneficiaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":"28 4","pages":"Pages 553-561"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301525000270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We investigated how the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) Medicare Part D benefit redesign may reduce out-of-pocket (OOP) drug expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries with dementia.

Methods

Using data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) linked with Medicare claims, we simulated post-redesign OOP drug spending by applying the 2025 prescription drug cost-sharing rules to each beneficiary’s pre-redesign Part D medication utilization for 2016, adjusting for inflation. Our study population comprised HRS respondents aged 65 and older in 2016, enrolled in Medicare fee for service, with at least one Part D drug claim in 2016, and diagnosed with dementia between 2000 and 2016 (n = 1677). We compared pre-redesign and post-redesign annual OOP drug expenditures stratified by: (1) low-income subsidy (LIS) eligibility status; (2) household income among non-LIS beneficiaries; (3) comorbidity count, and 4) cognitive impairment severity.

Results

After the redesign, we project average annual OOP drug expenditures among LIS beneficiaries with dementia to decrease from $56 to $25—representing a $31, or 55%, reduction. In contrast, among non-LIS beneficiaries, average OOP drug expenditures is projected to decrease from $772 to $576, a $196, or 25% reduction. We project the reduction in OOP drug expenditures to be greater among beneficiaries with 6 to 8 comorbidities (45%) than among beneficiaries with fewer comorbidities (21%-26%).

Conclusions

The Inflation Reduction Act Medicare Part D benefit redesign will reduce OOP drug spending for beneficiaries with dementia, resulting in potentially marked savings not only for low-income beneficiaries and beneficiaries with a high comorbidity burden but also for higher-income beneficiaries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通货膨胀减少法案下老年痴呆症医疗保险受益人自付药品支出的变化:一项模拟研究。
目的:我们调查了通货膨胀减少法案(IRA)医疗保险D部分福利重新设计如何减少老年痴呆症医疗保险受益人的自付(OOP)药物支出。利用与医疗保险索赔相关的健康与退休研究(HRS)数据,我们通过将2025年处方药成本分担规则应用于每个受益人在重新设计前的2016年D部分药物使用数据,模拟重新设计后的OOP药物支出,并对通货膨胀进行调整。我们的研究人群包括2016年65岁及以上的HRS受访者,他们参加了医疗保险按服务收费,2016年至少有一项D部分药物索赔,并在2000年至2016年期间被诊断患有痴呆症(n= 1677)。我们比较了重新设计前后的年度OOP药品支出:1)低收入补贴(LIS)资格分层;2)非lis受益人的家庭收入;3)合并症计数;4)认知障碍严重程度。结果:重新设计后,我们预计患有痴呆症的LIS受益人的平均年度OOP药物支出将从56美元减少到25美元-代表31美元,即减少55%。相比之下,在非lis受益人中,平均OOP药物支出预计将从772美元减少到576美元,减少196美元,即25%。我们预计,有6-8个合并症的受益人(45%)比合并症较少的受益人(21-26%)减少的OOP药物支出更大。结论:IRA医疗保险D部分福利重新设计将减少痴呆症受益人的OOP药物支出,不仅对低收入受益人和高合并症负担的受益人,而且对高收入受益人都有潜在的显著节省。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Fast Science, Slow Evaluation: What Makes Health Technology Assessment of Genetic and Genomic Technologies So Complicated? A Systematic Review of Methodological Challenges and Identified Suggestions. Designing and Implementing Real World Patient Reported Outcomes (RW- PROs) - Emerging Recommendations: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force. Development of the Medical Device Economic Evaluation Methodological Quality (DEEM-Q) Checklist. Informing the US Medicare drug price negotiation for Trelegy Ellipta and Breo Ellipta: Evaluating the impact of real-world evidence. Health economic evaluations alongside adaptive platform trials: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1