AS score: a novel score for predicting clinical outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1080/00365521.2025.2459237
Akif Yarkaç, Seyran Bozkurt, Ataman Köse, Çağrı Safa Buyurgan, Halil Oktay Usluer, Gülhan Temel
{"title":"AS score: a novel score for predicting clinical outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.","authors":"Akif Yarkaç, Seyran Bozkurt, Ataman Köse, Çağrı Safa Buyurgan, Halil Oktay Usluer, Gülhan Temel","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2025.2459237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB) is an significant cause of admission to emergency departments and hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of our study was to compare the pre-endoscopic risk scores used in the literature with our new score (AS score) in patients admitted to the emergency department due to upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 541 patients admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital due to UGIB were included in the study. Pre-endoscopic risk scores and AS score were compared in terms of the need for hospitalization, need for intensive care, need for endoscopic treatment, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All of the scores analysed in the study were found to be effective in predicting the need for hospitalization, the need for intensive care, the need for endoscopic treatment, and mortality. The most effective score in predicting mortality was the AS score. In addition, the sensitivity of the AS score was higher than the other scores in predicting the need for intensive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AS score is a new tool that may be useful in the management of patients admitted to the emergency department due to UGIB because of its advantages, such as not including laboratory parameters, being calculated in a very short time in the triage area at the time of patient presentation, and being integrated with the Charlson comorbidity index.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"213-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2459237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB) is an significant cause of admission to emergency departments and hospitalizations.

Aims: The aim of our study was to compare the pre-endoscopic risk scores used in the literature with our new score (AS score) in patients admitted to the emergency department due to upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).

Methods: A total of 541 patients admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital due to UGIB were included in the study. Pre-endoscopic risk scores and AS score were compared in terms of the need for hospitalization, need for intensive care, need for endoscopic treatment, and mortality.

Results: All of the scores analysed in the study were found to be effective in predicting the need for hospitalization, the need for intensive care, the need for endoscopic treatment, and mortality. The most effective score in predicting mortality was the AS score. In addition, the sensitivity of the AS score was higher than the other scores in predicting the need for intensive care.

Conclusions: The AS score is a new tool that may be useful in the management of patients admitted to the emergency department due to UGIB because of its advantages, such as not including laboratory parameters, being calculated in a very short time in the triage area at the time of patient presentation, and being integrated with the Charlson comorbidity index.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AS评分:一种预测上消化道出血临床结果的新评分。
背景:上消化道出血(UGIB)是急诊和住院的重要原因。目的:我们研究的目的是比较文献中使用的内镜前风险评分与我们的新评分(AS评分)在急诊因上消化道出血(UGIB)入院的患者中。方法:选取某三级医院急诊收治的541例UGIB患者作为研究对象。比较内镜前风险评分和AS评分在住院需要、重症监护需要、内镜治疗需要和死亡率方面的差异。结果:本研究分析的所有评分均可有效预测住院需求、重症监护需求、内窥镜治疗需求和死亡率。预测死亡率最有效的评分是AS评分。此外,AS评分在预测重症监护需要方面的敏感性高于其他评分。结论:AS评分具有不包括实验室参数、患者就诊时分诊区可在很短时间内计算出、与Charlson合并症指数相结合等优点,是一种新的工具,可能有助于对因UGIB而进入急诊科的患者进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
期刊最新文献
Comparison of endoscopy and mobile health index for ulcerative colitis. Radiologic predictors of early recurrence of acute cholecystitis following percutaneous cholecystostomy tube removal. Real-world management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms - findings from a nationwide survey. Collagenous sprue across five decades (1970-2025): a systematic review. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Identification of Spondyloarthritis Questionnaire (IBIS-Q) into Danish for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1