Analysis of Delirium Risk Assessment Tools for Prediction of Postoperative Delirium Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005271
Manjot Singh, Maxwell Sahhar, Joseph E Nassar, Michael J Farias, Rhea Rasquinha, Jinseong Kim, Bassel G Diebo, Alan H Daniels
{"title":"Analysis of Delirium Risk Assessment Tools for Prediction of Postoperative Delirium Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion.","authors":"Manjot Singh, Maxwell Sahhar, Joseph E Nassar, Michael J Farias, Rhea Rasquinha, Jinseong Kim, Bassel G Diebo, Alan H Daniels","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the utility of Delirium Risk Assessment Score (DRAS), Delirium Risk Assessment Tool (DRAT), and Delirium Elderly At-Risk (DEAR) in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusions.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical interventions can place patients at risk for postoperative delirium (POD), an acute and often severe cognitive impairment associated with poor outcomes. However, common risk assessment tools have not been validated in patients undergoing spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adults who underwent posterior lumbar fusion were queried using PearlDiver. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and delirium occurrence within seven days of surgery were extracted. Delirium risk scores were calculated using DRAS (15 points total; threshold five points), DRAT (eight points total; threshold three points), and DEAR (five points total; threshold two points) scales. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and optimal risk scores maximizing Youden index were established for each measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 37,119 patients, 70 patients (0.2%) developed POD. The mean age was 60.1 y, 56.6% were female, and mean Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 2.1. POD patients had lower mean age and percent female sex, but higher mean CCI and percent medical comorbidities (all P <0.05). ROC curve analyses revealed that a DRAS score of five (sensitivity=62.9%, specificity=63.9%), DRAT score of three (sensitivity=31.4%, specificity=81.0%), and DEAR score of two (sensitivity=40.0%, specificity=82.9%) maximized the Youden index value. Patients above these thresholds were 6.0, 2.0, and 3.2 times more likely to develop POD after posterior lumbar fusion, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delirium risk assessments tools were found to be useful in stratifying patients at high risk of POD following posterior lumbar fusion. Specifically, patients above the predefined thresholds were two to six times more likely to develop delirium postoperatively. Careful stratification of patients' risk of delirium using highly sensitive and specific tools like DRAS may guide preoperative surgical planning and postoperative management plans.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1667-1672"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: Evaluate the utility of Delirium Risk Assessment Score (DRAS), Delirium Risk Assessment Tool (DRAT), and Delirium Elderly At-Risk (DEAR) in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusions.

Background: Surgical interventions can place patients at risk for postoperative delirium (POD), an acute and often severe cognitive impairment associated with poor outcomes. However, common risk assessment tools have not been validated in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Materials and methods: Adults who underwent posterior lumbar fusion were queried using PearlDiver. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and delirium occurrence within seven days of surgery were extracted. Delirium risk scores were calculated using DRAS (15 points total; threshold five points), DRAT (eight points total; threshold three points), and DEAR (five points total; threshold two points) scales. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and optimal risk scores maximizing Youden index were established for each measure.

Results: Among 37,119 patients, 70 patients (0.2%) developed POD. The mean age was 60.1 y, 56.6% were female, and mean Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 2.1. POD patients had lower mean age and percent female sex, but higher mean CCI and percent medical comorbidities (all P <0.05). ROC curve analyses revealed that a DRAS score of five (sensitivity=62.9%, specificity=63.9%), DRAT score of three (sensitivity=31.4%, specificity=81.0%), and DEAR score of two (sensitivity=40.0%, specificity=82.9%) maximized the Youden index value. Patients above these thresholds were 6.0, 2.0, and 3.2 times more likely to develop POD after posterior lumbar fusion, respectively.

Conclusion: Delirium risk assessments tools were found to be useful in stratifying patients at high risk of POD following posterior lumbar fusion. Specifically, patients above the predefined thresholds were two to six times more likely to develop delirium postoperatively. Careful stratification of patients' risk of delirium using highly sensitive and specific tools like DRAS may guide preoperative surgical planning and postoperative management plans.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测腰椎融合术后谵妄风险评估工具的分析。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:评价谵妄风险评估评分(DRAS)、谵妄风险评估工具(DRAT)和老年谵妄风险(DEAR)在后路腰椎椎间融合术患者中的应用价值。背景:手术干预可能使患者面临术后谵妄(POD)的风险,这是一种急性且通常是严重的认知障碍,与不良预后相关。然而,常见的风险评估工具尚未在脊柱手术患者中得到验证。方法:使用PearlDiver对接受后路腰椎融合术的成年人进行询问。提取基线人口统计学、合并症和手术后7天内谵妄的发生情况。谵妄风险评分采用DRAS计算(总分15分;阈值5分),DRAT(共8分;阈值3分),DEAR(共5分;阈值2点)尺度。生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并为每项测量建立最大化约登指数的最优风险评分。结果:37119例患者中,70例(0.2%)发生POD。平均年龄60.1岁,女性56.6%,平均Charlson合并症指数(CCI)为2.1。POD患者的平均年龄和女性比例较低,但平均CCI和医学合并症的比例较高(均为p)。结论:发现谵妄风险评估工具可用于对后路腰椎融合术后POD高风险患者进行分层。具体来说,高于预定义阈值的患者术后发生谵妄的可能性是其2 - 6倍。使用DRAS等高度敏感和特异性的工具对患者谵妄风险进行仔细分层,可以指导术前手术计划和术后管理计划。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Prognosis of Coronal Malalignment Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity. Perioperative Safety of Lumbar Decompression Surgery Performed Under Continuous Low-Dose Aspirin Administration. Achieving Greater Segmental Lordosis With Intraoperative Mechanical Hinging and Bilateral Facetectomies in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Incidence and Predictors of Oral Steroid Use Shortly Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy. Mild Changes in Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Quality Predict Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1