Water impact analysis due to coal-electricity generation using the life cycle assessment method: a case study in Malaysia.

IF 2.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Water Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.2166/wst.2024.402
Nurul Hani Mardi, Lee Woen Ean, Marlinda Abdul Malek, Kok Hua Chua, Ali Najah Ahmed
{"title":"Water impact analysis due to coal-electricity generation using the life cycle assessment method: a case study in Malaysia.","authors":"Nurul Hani Mardi, Lee Woen Ean, Marlinda Abdul Malek, Kok Hua Chua, Ali Najah Ahmed","doi":"10.2166/wst.2024.402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coal power plants adversely impact air pollution, but they also pose a risk to our water sources. Discharge wastewater from power plants may degrade the quality of nearby water bodies. This study evaluates the potential water-related environmental impacts of electricity generation at an ultra-supercritical coal power plant in Malaysia using the life cycle assessment method. The inventory data were gathered from a Malaysian power plant, and supporting data were taken from the relevant literature. Utilizing the ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method, this study analyses the mid-point impact categories of freshwater eutrophication (FEP), marine eutrophication (MEP), freshwater ecotoxicity (FETP), and marine ecotoxicity (METP). The results indicate that METP is the leading risk, with an average impact of 1.94 × 10<sup>-2</sup> kg 1,4-DCB per kWh electricity generated, followed by FETP (1.40 × 10<sup>-2</sup> kg 1,4-DCB), FEP (4.66 × 10<sup>-4</sup> kg P eq), and MEP (2.95 × 10<sup>-5</sup> kg N eq). About 95% of the mid-point impact is due to the extraction and processing of hard coal. These findings underscore a critical aspect of environmental management at the supply chain level. Furthermore, mitigating direct emissions from power generation could reduce the mid-point impact, as demonstrated by comparisons with previous research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23653,"journal":{"name":"Water Science and Technology","volume":"91 2","pages":"219-234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coal power plants adversely impact air pollution, but they also pose a risk to our water sources. Discharge wastewater from power plants may degrade the quality of nearby water bodies. This study evaluates the potential water-related environmental impacts of electricity generation at an ultra-supercritical coal power plant in Malaysia using the life cycle assessment method. The inventory data were gathered from a Malaysian power plant, and supporting data were taken from the relevant literature. Utilizing the ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method, this study analyses the mid-point impact categories of freshwater eutrophication (FEP), marine eutrophication (MEP), freshwater ecotoxicity (FETP), and marine ecotoxicity (METP). The results indicate that METP is the leading risk, with an average impact of 1.94 × 10-2 kg 1,4-DCB per kWh electricity generated, followed by FETP (1.40 × 10-2 kg 1,4-DCB), FEP (4.66 × 10-4 kg P eq), and MEP (2.95 × 10-5 kg N eq). About 95% of the mid-point impact is due to the extraction and processing of hard coal. These findings underscore a critical aspect of environmental management at the supply chain level. Furthermore, mitigating direct emissions from power generation could reduce the mid-point impact, as demonstrated by comparisons with previous research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用生命周期评价方法分析煤电对水的影响:以马来西亚为例。
燃煤电厂对空气污染产生了不利影响,但它们也对我们的水源构成了风险。发电厂排放的废水可能会降低附近水体的水质。本研究使用生命周期评估方法评估了马来西亚超超临界燃煤电厂发电对水相关环境的潜在影响。库存数据来自马来西亚一家发电厂,支持数据来自相关文献。利用ReCiPe 2016影响评价方法,分析了淡水富营养化(FEP)、海洋富营养化(MEP)、淡水生态毒性(FETP)和海洋生态毒性(METP)的中点影响类别。结果表明,METP是最大风险,平均影响1.94 × 10-2 kg 1,4- dcb / kWh发电量,其次是FETP (1.40 × 10-2 kg 1,4- dcb)、FEP (4.66 × 10-4 kg P eq)和MEP (2.95 × 10-5 kg N eq)。大约95%的中点影响是由于硬煤的提取和加工。这些发现强调了供应链层面环境管理的一个关键方面。此外,通过与以前的研究进行比较,可以证明,减少发电的直接排放可以减少中点影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Science and Technology
Water Science and Technology 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
366
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Water Science and Technology publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of the science and technology of water and wastewater. Papers are selected by a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, development and application of new techniques, and related managerial and policy issues. Scientists, engineers, consultants, managers and policy-makers will find this journal essential as a permanent record of progress of research activities and their practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Synergizing process efficiency and environmental sustainability in a pilot-scale anaerobic digestion system for volatile fatty acid recovery from waste. Parametric study on electro-coagulation for efficient removal of microplastics from reverse osmosis wastewater. Molecular solutions to carbon pollution: innovations, mechanisms, and challenges in solvent-based carbon capture. Effect of the feeding strategy on aerobic granular sludge formation and microbial selection in the treatment of real brewery wastewater. Development and characterization of cetylpyridinium chloride/mucilage-based composite membranes for environmental pollution control: adsorption of Alizarin Red S and antimicrobial properties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1