MemScreen: A smartphone application for detection of mild cognitive impairment: A validation study: Smartphone App for MCI Detection.

IF 4.3 Q2 BUSINESS The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100077
Julien Dumurgier, Claire Paquet, Jacques Hugon, Vincent Planche, Sinead Gaubert, Stéphane Epelbaum, Stéphanie Bombois, Marc Teichmann, Richard Levy, Estelle Baudouin, Agathe Vrillon, Claire Hourrègue, Emmanuel Cognat, Séverine Sabia, Archana Singh-Manoux
{"title":"MemScreen: A smartphone application for detection of mild cognitive impairment: A validation study: Smartphone App for MCI Detection.","authors":"Julien Dumurgier, Claire Paquet, Jacques Hugon, Vincent Planche, Sinead Gaubert, Stéphane Epelbaum, Stéphanie Bombois, Marc Teichmann, Richard Levy, Estelle Baudouin, Agathe Vrillon, Claire Hourrègue, Emmanuel Cognat, Séverine Sabia, Archana Singh-Manoux","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Primary care is often the first point of contact for patients with cognitive complaints, making initial cognitive screening an essential step to avoid delays in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) at an early stage. We developed MemScreen, a self-administered smartphone application that assesses overall cognition and verbal memory, and evaluated its ability to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in both general and clinical populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two validation cohort studies: (1) UK-based Whitehall II cohort study (13th wave, 2018-2022) involving a general population (MCI defined by poor performance on a global cognitive score), and (2) five French memory clinics involving patients without dementia (amnestic MCI defined by the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test). MemScreen, MMSE, and TMT-A effectiveness was assessed using Area Under the Curve (AUC) values from unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Whitehall II (n = 2118, mean age 75.9 years, 23.9 % women, 14.5 % MCI), median MemScreen completion time was 4 min 18 s. MemScreen had the highest AUC (0.87; 95 % CI: 0.82-0.89) for distinguishing MCI, outperforming MMSE (AUC = 0.79; 0.76-0.82; p = 0.018) and TMT-A (AUC = 0.77; 0.74-0.80; p = 0.023). MemScreen sensitivity and specificity were 78.6 % and 78.7 %, respectively. In memory clinics (n = 303, mean age 70.5 years, 53 % women, 46.9 % amnestic MCI), median completion time was 5 min 17 s. MemScreen showed superior performance (AUC = 0.87; 0.83-0.91) compared to MMSE (AUC = 0.72; 0.67-0.78; p < 0.001) and TMT-A (AUC = 0.63; 0.56-0.69; p < 0.001), with 93.0 % sensitivity and 54.0 % specificity for amnestic MCI.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>MemScreen outperformed traditional tests in identifying MCI in both general and clinical populations. Its self-administration and short completion time suggest potential as an effective screening tool to optimize memory clinic referrals for AD diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"100077"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Primary care is often the first point of contact for patients with cognitive complaints, making initial cognitive screening an essential step to avoid delays in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) at an early stage. We developed MemScreen, a self-administered smartphone application that assesses overall cognition and verbal memory, and evaluated its ability to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in both general and clinical populations.

Methods: We conducted two validation cohort studies: (1) UK-based Whitehall II cohort study (13th wave, 2018-2022) involving a general population (MCI defined by poor performance on a global cognitive score), and (2) five French memory clinics involving patients without dementia (amnestic MCI defined by the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test). MemScreen, MMSE, and TMT-A effectiveness was assessed using Area Under the Curve (AUC) values from unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models.

Results: In Whitehall II (n = 2118, mean age 75.9 years, 23.9 % women, 14.5 % MCI), median MemScreen completion time was 4 min 18 s. MemScreen had the highest AUC (0.87; 95 % CI: 0.82-0.89) for distinguishing MCI, outperforming MMSE (AUC = 0.79; 0.76-0.82; p = 0.018) and TMT-A (AUC = 0.77; 0.74-0.80; p = 0.023). MemScreen sensitivity and specificity were 78.6 % and 78.7 %, respectively. In memory clinics (n = 303, mean age 70.5 years, 53 % women, 46.9 % amnestic MCI), median completion time was 5 min 17 s. MemScreen showed superior performance (AUC = 0.87; 0.83-0.91) compared to MMSE (AUC = 0.72; 0.67-0.78; p < 0.001) and TMT-A (AUC = 0.63; 0.56-0.69; p < 0.001), with 93.0 % sensitivity and 54.0 % specificity for amnestic MCI.

Discussion: MemScreen outperformed traditional tests in identifying MCI in both general and clinical populations. Its self-administration and short completion time suggest potential as an effective screening tool to optimize memory clinic referrals for AD diagnosis and treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景和目的:基层医疗机构通常是认知障碍患者的第一接触点,因此初步认知筛查是避免延误阿尔茨海默病(AD)早期诊断的必要步骤。我们开发了一款可评估整体认知能力和言语记忆力的自助式智能手机应用程序 MemScreen,并对其在普通人群和临床人群中检测轻度认知障碍(MCI)的能力进行了评估:我们进行了两项验证队列研究:(1)英国怀特霍尔 II 队列研究(第 13 波,2018-2022 年),涉及普通人群(MCI 的定义是整体认知评分表现不佳);(2)法国五家记忆诊所,涉及无痴呆症的患者(MCI 的定义是失忆性 MCI,通过自由和诱导选择性记忆测试)。使用未调整和调整后逻辑回归模型的曲线下面积 (AUC) 值评估 MemScreen、MMSE 和 TMT-A 的有效性:在 Whitehall II(n = 2118,平均年龄 75.9 岁,23.9% 为女性,14.5% 为 MCI)中,MemScreen 的中位完成时间为 4 分 18 秒。87;95 % CI:0.82-0.89),优于 MMSE(AUC = 0.79;0.76-0.82;p = 0.018)和 TMT-A(AUC = 0.77;0.74-0.80;p = 0.023)。MemScreen 的灵敏度和特异度分别为 78.6 % 和 78.7 %。在记忆门诊中(n = 303,平均年龄 70.5 岁,53 % 为女性,46.9 % 为失忆性 MCI),中位完成时间为 5 分 17 秒。与 MMSE(AUC = 0.72;0.67-0.78;p < 0.001)和 TMT-A(AUC = 0.63;0.56-0.69;p < 0.001)相比,MemScreen 的性能更优(AUC = 0.87;0.83-0.91),对失忆型 MCI 的敏感性为 93.0%,特异性为 54.0%:MemScreen在普通人群和临床人群中识别MCI的效果优于传统测试。MemScreen 的自我管理和完成时间短的特点表明,它有可能成为一种有效的筛查工具,用于优化记忆门诊的转诊,以诊断和治疗注意力缺失症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
期刊最新文献
Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome and incidence of dementia among older adults. Qualitative research and literature review support the integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) content validity in early symptomatic AD. Associations of glycemic status with dynamic disease trajectories of atrial fibrillation and dementia. Validation of the multi-day Boston remote assessment of neurocognitive health (BRANCH) among cognitively impaired & unimpaired older adults. Modifiable risk factors for early- and late-onset dementia using the Korean national health insurance service database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1