Social Return on Investment Analysis: A Mixed Methods Approach to Assessing the Value of Adult Hospice Services

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.004
Nicole M. Hughes PhD , Jane Noyes DPhil , Trystan Pritchard MBA , Carys Stringer PhD
{"title":"Social Return on Investment Analysis: A Mixed Methods Approach to Assessing the Value of Adult Hospice Services","authors":"Nicole M. Hughes PhD ,&nbsp;Jane Noyes DPhil ,&nbsp;Trystan Pritchard MBA ,&nbsp;Carys Stringer PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Hospice services offer invaluable support to individuals facing life-limiting illnesses; however, quantifying their positive impact presents a challenge. As the demand for palliative care rises because of complex illnesses and an aging population, hospices face the need to prove their value. With funding primarily reliant on charitable donations and limited statutory support, they must demonstrate their effectiveness to secure additional resources in a competitive landscape.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study used the Social Return on Investment framework to evaluate the social value generated by four hospice sites offering inpatient and day therapy services across North Wales. Through a mixed-methods approach, quantitative and qualitative data were collected to explore stakeholder experiences, values, and outcomes, facilitating a thorough examination of the broader social impact of hospice care.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average input and output values for the inpatient unit were £602 100 and £1 667 861, respectively, thus returning a base case ratio of £2.77:£1. The day therapy unit had average input and output costs of £155 928 and £1 847 347, respectively, hence a base-case ratio of £11.85:£1. Sensitivity analysis yielded estimates of between £2.20:£1 and £6.83:£1 for the inpatient unit and between £2:44:£1 and £19:51:£1 for the day therapy unit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>As healthcare providers globally confront challenges with resource constraints, adopting value-driven methodologies becomes crucial. Embracing such methodologies fosters a more comprehensive understanding of value, transcending traditional metrics to encompass social, environmental, and long-term sustainability considerations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":"28 3","pages":"Pages 424-430"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301525000221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Hospice services offer invaluable support to individuals facing life-limiting illnesses; however, quantifying their positive impact presents a challenge. As the demand for palliative care rises because of complex illnesses and an aging population, hospices face the need to prove their value. With funding primarily reliant on charitable donations and limited statutory support, they must demonstrate their effectiveness to secure additional resources in a competitive landscape.

Methods

This study used the Social Return on Investment framework to evaluate the social value generated by four hospice sites offering inpatient and day therapy services across North Wales. Through a mixed-methods approach, quantitative and qualitative data were collected to explore stakeholder experiences, values, and outcomes, facilitating a thorough examination of the broader social impact of hospice care.

Results

The average input and output values for the inpatient unit were £602 100 and £1 667 861, respectively, thus returning a base case ratio of £2.77:£1. The day therapy unit had average input and output costs of £155 928 and £1 847 347, respectively, hence a base-case ratio of £11.85:£1. Sensitivity analysis yielded estimates of between £2.20:£1 and £6.83:£1 for the inpatient unit and between £2:44:£1 and £19:51:£1 for the day therapy unit.

Conclusions

As healthcare providers globally confront challenges with resource constraints, adopting value-driven methodologies becomes crucial. Embracing such methodologies fosters a more comprehensive understanding of value, transcending traditional metrics to encompass social, environmental, and long-term sustainability considerations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Performance of the EQ-5D-5L with skin irritation and self-confidence bolt-on items in patients with urticaria. The Value of Positron Emission Tomography for Confirmation of Alzheimer's Disease in the Era of Amyloid-Targeting Therapies. Use of Real-World Evidence in Health Technology Reassessments Across Six Health Technology Assessment Agencies. A Comprehensive View of the Methods Used to Measure the Societal Impact of Healthcare Interventions: A Systematic Review. A systematic review and meta-analysis of health state utility values for infectious diseases with pandemic potential and associated vaccine adverse reactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1