Social Return on Investment Analysis: A Mixed Methods Approach to Assessing the Value of Adult Hospice Services

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.004
Nicole M. Hughes PhD , Jane Noyes DPhil , Trystan Pritchard MBA , Carys Stringer PhD
{"title":"Social Return on Investment Analysis: A Mixed Methods Approach to Assessing the Value of Adult Hospice Services","authors":"Nicole M. Hughes PhD ,&nbsp;Jane Noyes DPhil ,&nbsp;Trystan Pritchard MBA ,&nbsp;Carys Stringer PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Hospice services offer invaluable support to individuals facing life-limiting illnesses; however, quantifying their positive impact presents a challenge. As the demand for palliative care rises because of complex illnesses and an aging population, hospices face the need to prove their value. With funding primarily reliant on charitable donations and limited statutory support, they must demonstrate their effectiveness to secure additional resources in a competitive landscape.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study used the Social Return on Investment framework to evaluate the social value generated by four hospice sites offering inpatient and day therapy services across North Wales. Through a mixed-methods approach, quantitative and qualitative data were collected to explore stakeholder experiences, values, and outcomes, facilitating a thorough examination of the broader social impact of hospice care.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average input and output values for the inpatient unit were £602 100 and £1 667 861, respectively, thus returning a base case ratio of £2.77:£1. The day therapy unit had average input and output costs of £155 928 and £1 847 347, respectively, hence a base-case ratio of £11.85:£1. Sensitivity analysis yielded estimates of between £2.20:£1 and £6.83:£1 for the inpatient unit and between £2:44:£1 and £19:51:£1 for the day therapy unit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>As healthcare providers globally confront challenges with resource constraints, adopting value-driven methodologies becomes crucial. Embracing such methodologies fosters a more comprehensive understanding of value, transcending traditional metrics to encompass social, environmental, and long-term sustainability considerations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":"28 3","pages":"Pages 424-430"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301525000221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Hospice services offer invaluable support to individuals facing life-limiting illnesses; however, quantifying their positive impact presents a challenge. As the demand for palliative care rises because of complex illnesses and an aging population, hospices face the need to prove their value. With funding primarily reliant on charitable donations and limited statutory support, they must demonstrate their effectiveness to secure additional resources in a competitive landscape.

Methods

This study used the Social Return on Investment framework to evaluate the social value generated by four hospice sites offering inpatient and day therapy services across North Wales. Through a mixed-methods approach, quantitative and qualitative data were collected to explore stakeholder experiences, values, and outcomes, facilitating a thorough examination of the broader social impact of hospice care.

Results

The average input and output values for the inpatient unit were £602 100 and £1 667 861, respectively, thus returning a base case ratio of £2.77:£1. The day therapy unit had average input and output costs of £155 928 and £1 847 347, respectively, hence a base-case ratio of £11.85:£1. Sensitivity analysis yielded estimates of between £2.20:£1 and £6.83:£1 for the inpatient unit and between £2:44:£1 and £19:51:£1 for the day therapy unit.

Conclusions

As healthcare providers globally confront challenges with resource constraints, adopting value-driven methodologies becomes crucial. Embracing such methodologies fosters a more comprehensive understanding of value, transcending traditional metrics to encompass social, environmental, and long-term sustainability considerations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会投资回报分析:评估成人安宁疗护服务价值的混合方法。
安宁疗护服务为面临生命限制疾病的个人提供宝贵的支持,然而,量化其积极影响是一项挑战。由于复杂的疾病和人口老龄化,对姑息治疗的需求上升,临终关怀面临着证明其价值的需要。由于资金主要依靠慈善捐赠和有限的法定支持,它们必须证明自己在竞争激烈的环境中获得额外资源的有效性。方法本研究采用社会投资回报(SROI)架构,评估北威尔斯四间提供住院及日间治疗服务的安宁疗护场所所产生的社会价值。通过混合方法,收集定量和定性数据来探索利益相关者的经验,价值观和结果,促进对安宁疗护更广泛的社会影响的彻底检查。结果住院单元的平均投入和产出值分别为£602,100和£1,667,861,因此返回的基本病例比为£2.77:£1。日间治疗单元的平均投入和产出成本分别为155,928英镑和1,847,347英镑,因此基本情况比率为11.85英镑:1英镑。敏感性分析得出的估计值在2.20英镑:1英镑和6.83英镑之间,其中住院病房为1英镑,日间治疗病房为2:44英镑:1英镑和19:51英镑之间。随着全球医疗保健提供者面临资源限制的挑战,采用价值驱动的方法变得至关重要。采用这种方法可以促进对价值更全面的理解,超越传统的衡量标准,将社会、环境和长期可持续性考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Validation and Clinical Meaningfulness of the 18-item National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (NCCN-FACT) Lymphoma Symptom Index (NFLymSI-18) in Patients with Lymphoma. A systematic review of quantitative health preference methods to support value clarification and shared-decision making: A report of an ISPOR special interest group. Author Reply. Eliciting Societal Preferences for Health Equity: Reflections on Health Inequality Aversion in the United States. Impact of Smoothing and Modeling Approach on Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy Estimates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1