Strategies for recruitment and retention of diverse and underserved cancer survivor and caregiver dyads in clinical trials

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101425
Mary Hadeed , Terry A. Badger , Chris Segrin , Rogelio Robles-Morales , Samantha J. Werts-Pelter
{"title":"Strategies for recruitment and retention of diverse and underserved cancer survivor and caregiver dyads in clinical trials","authors":"Mary Hadeed ,&nbsp;Terry A. Badger ,&nbsp;Chris Segrin ,&nbsp;Rogelio Robles-Morales ,&nbsp;Samantha J. Werts-Pelter","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cancer survivor-caregiver dyads from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups and those with lower socioeconomic status are less likely to participate in clinical research. Sociocultural and socioeconomic barriers perpetuate health inequity and increase disparities in cancer care.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We describe our systematic approach to recruiting and retaining diverse survivor-caregiver dyads in supportive cancer care studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Matsuda's research recruitment guidelines of evaluate, engage, reflect, and carefully match (“EERC”) were adapted and applied through a framework of six guiding principles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A systematic approach to recruitment of underrepresented dyads in cancer support research includes 1) Developing a bilingual, bicultural study team with shared language and culture of the study population, 2) Ensuring team members share a passion for cancer health equity and are trained with a community-centric approach, 3) Designing accessible interventions, study materials, and shared data collection tools across similar studies with community and stakeholder input, 4) Engaging local and regional stakeholders with expertise of health disparities among the catchment area, 5) Partnering with Community Health Workers (CHWs) and gatekeepers to enhance community presence, and 6) Ensuring careful application of matching study team members and participants beyond race and ethnicity to prioritize the cultural values and social factors that impact cancer survivors and caregivers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Applying a systematic approach to recruiting and retaining underrepresented dyads in cancer research can potentially reduce sociocultural and socioeconomic barriers to cancer health equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 101425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424001728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cancer survivor-caregiver dyads from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups and those with lower socioeconomic status are less likely to participate in clinical research. Sociocultural and socioeconomic barriers perpetuate health inequity and increase disparities in cancer care.

Purpose

We describe our systematic approach to recruiting and retaining diverse survivor-caregiver dyads in supportive cancer care studies.

Methods

Matsuda's research recruitment guidelines of evaluate, engage, reflect, and carefully match (“EERC”) were adapted and applied through a framework of six guiding principles.

Results

A systematic approach to recruitment of underrepresented dyads in cancer support research includes 1) Developing a bilingual, bicultural study team with shared language and culture of the study population, 2) Ensuring team members share a passion for cancer health equity and are trained with a community-centric approach, 3) Designing accessible interventions, study materials, and shared data collection tools across similar studies with community and stakeholder input, 4) Engaging local and regional stakeholders with expertise of health disparities among the catchment area, 5) Partnering with Community Health Workers (CHWs) and gatekeepers to enhance community presence, and 6) Ensuring careful application of matching study team members and participants beyond race and ethnicity to prioritize the cultural values and social factors that impact cancer survivors and caregivers.

Conclusion

Applying a systematic approach to recruiting and retaining underrepresented dyads in cancer research can potentially reduce sociocultural and socioeconomic barriers to cancer health equity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临床试验中招募和保留多样化和服务不足的癌症幸存者和护理者的策略。
背景:来自代表性不足的种族和民族群体以及社会经济地位较低的癌症幸存者-照顾者二人组不太可能参与临床研究。社会文化和社会经济障碍使卫生不平等永久化,并扩大了癌症治疗方面的差距。目的:我们描述了我们在支持性癌症治疗研究中招募和保留不同的幸存者-照顾者的系统方法。方法:通过六个指导原则的框架,对松田研究招聘的评估、参与、反思和仔细匹配(EERC)准则进行了调整和应用。结果:在癌症支持研究中招募代表性不足的二人组的系统方法包括:1)建立一个双语、双文化的研究团队,与研究人群拥有共同的语言和文化;2)确保团队成员对癌症健康公平有共同的热情,并接受以社区为中心的方法的培训;3)在社区和利益相关者的参与下,设计可访问的干预措施、研究材料和跨类似研究的共享数据收集工具。4)与当地和区域利益相关者合作,了解集水区之间的健康差异;5)与社区卫生工作者(chw)和看门人合作,提高社区存在感;6)确保仔细应用匹配的研究团队成员和参与者,超越种族和民族,优先考虑影响癌症幸存者和照顾者的文化价值观和社会因素。结论:采用系统的方法在癌症研究中招募和保留代表性不足的二人组可以潜在地减少癌症健康公平的社会文化和社会经济障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
期刊最新文献
Clinical efficacy of Xiaotan Sanjie decoction in treating gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Adjusting for intercurrent events using Bayesian joint models for longitudinal outcomes in clinical trials. IGROOVE: Protocol for a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial of dance intervention in older adults with subjective cognitive decline. Relaxation effects of Shikuwasa (Citrus depressa Hayata) essential oil inhalation: A randomized controlled trial in young adult females Designing communication strategies to increase rural participation in clinical trials using the Health Belief Model and strategic communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1