Photon-counting detector CTA to assess intracranial stents and flow diverters: an in vivo study with ultrahigh-resolution spectral reconstructions.

IF 3.6 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Experimental Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1186/s41747-025-00550-9
Frederic De Beukelaer, Sophie De Beukelaer, Laura L Wuyts, Omid Nikoubashman, Mohammed El Halal, Iliana Kantzeli, Martin Wiesmann, Hani Ridwan, Charlotte S Weyland
{"title":"Photon-counting detector CTA to assess intracranial stents and flow diverters: an in vivo study with ultrahigh-resolution spectral reconstructions.","authors":"Frederic De Beukelaer, Sophie De Beukelaer, Laura L Wuyts, Omid Nikoubashman, Mohammed El Halal, Iliana Kantzeli, Martin Wiesmann, Hani Ridwan, Charlotte S Weyland","doi":"10.1186/s41747-025-00550-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To define optimal parameters for the evaluation of vessel visibility in intracranial stents (ICS) and flow diverters (FD) using photon-counting detector computed tomography angiography (PCD-CTA) with spectral reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with implanted ICS or FD, who received a PCD-CTA between April 2023 and March 2024. Polyenergetic, virtual monoenergetic, pure lumen, and iodine reconstructions with different keV levels (40, 60, and 80) and reconstruction kernels (body vascular [Bv]48, Bv56, Bv64, Bv72, and Bv76) were evaluated by two radiologists with regions of interests and Likert scales. Reconstructions were compared in descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, twelve patients with nine FDs and six ICSs were analyzed. In terms of quantitative image quality, sharper kernels as Bv64 and Bv72 yielded increased image noise and decreased signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios compared to the smoothest kernel Bv48 (p = 0.001). Among the different keV levels and kernels, readers selected the 40 keV level (p = 0.001) and sharper kernels (in the majority of cases Bv72) as the best to visualize the in-stent vessel lumen. Assessing the different spectral reconstructions virtual monoenergetic and iodine reconstructions proved to be best to evaluate in-stent vessel lumen (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCD-CTA and spectral reconstructions with sharper reconstruction kernels and a low keV level of 40 seem to be beneficial to achieve optimal image quality for the evaluation of ICS and FD. Iodine and virtual monoenergetic reconstructions were superior to pure lumen and polyenergetic reconstructions to evaluate in-stent vessel lumen.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>PCD-CTA offers the opportunity to reduce the need for invasive angiography serving as follow-up examination after intracranial stent (ICS) or flow diverter (FD) implantation.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Neuroimaging of intracranial vessels with implanted stents and flow diverters is limited by artifacts. Twelve patients with nine flow diverters and six intracranial stents underwent photon-counting detector computed tomography angiography (PCD-CTA). In-stent vessel lumen visibility improved using sharp reconstruction kernels and a low keV level. Virtual monoenergetic and iodine reconstructions were best to evaluate in-stent vessel lumen.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"9 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-025-00550-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To define optimal parameters for the evaluation of vessel visibility in intracranial stents (ICS) and flow diverters (FD) using photon-counting detector computed tomography angiography (PCD-CTA) with spectral reconstructions.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with implanted ICS or FD, who received a PCD-CTA between April 2023 and March 2024. Polyenergetic, virtual monoenergetic, pure lumen, and iodine reconstructions with different keV levels (40, 60, and 80) and reconstruction kernels (body vascular [Bv]48, Bv56, Bv64, Bv72, and Bv76) were evaluated by two radiologists with regions of interests and Likert scales. Reconstructions were compared in descriptive analysis.

Results: In total, twelve patients with nine FDs and six ICSs were analyzed. In terms of quantitative image quality, sharper kernels as Bv64 and Bv72 yielded increased image noise and decreased signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios compared to the smoothest kernel Bv48 (p = 0.001). Among the different keV levels and kernels, readers selected the 40 keV level (p = 0.001) and sharper kernels (in the majority of cases Bv72) as the best to visualize the in-stent vessel lumen. Assessing the different spectral reconstructions virtual monoenergetic and iodine reconstructions proved to be best to evaluate in-stent vessel lumen (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: PCD-CTA and spectral reconstructions with sharper reconstruction kernels and a low keV level of 40 seem to be beneficial to achieve optimal image quality for the evaluation of ICS and FD. Iodine and virtual monoenergetic reconstructions were superior to pure lumen and polyenergetic reconstructions to evaluate in-stent vessel lumen.

Relevance statement: PCD-CTA offers the opportunity to reduce the need for invasive angiography serving as follow-up examination after intracranial stent (ICS) or flow diverter (FD) implantation.

Key points: Neuroimaging of intracranial vessels with implanted stents and flow diverters is limited by artifacts. Twelve patients with nine flow diverters and six intracranial stents underwent photon-counting detector computed tomography angiography (PCD-CTA). In-stent vessel lumen visibility improved using sharp reconstruction kernels and a low keV level. Virtual monoenergetic and iodine reconstructions were best to evaluate in-stent vessel lumen.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光子计数检测器CTA评估颅内支架和血流分流器:超高分辨率光谱重建的体内研究。
背景:利用光谱重建的光子计数检测器计算机断层扫描血管造影(PCD-CTA)确定评估颅内支架(ICS)和分流器(FD)血管可见性的最佳参数。方法:我们回顾性分析了2023年4月至2024年3月期间接受PCD-CTA的连续植入ICS或FD患者。由两名放射科医生用兴趣区域和李克特量表评估不同keV水平(40、60和80)和重建核(体血管[Bv]48、Bv56、Bv64、Bv72和Bv76)的多能、虚拟单能、纯管腔和碘重建。在描述性分析中比较重建结果。结果:共分析12例FDs 9例,ICSs 6例。在定量图像质量方面,与最平滑的内核Bv48相比,更清晰的内核Bv64和Bv72产生了更高的图像噪声,降低了信噪比和对比度(p = 0.001)。在不同的keV水平和核中,读者选择40 keV水平(p = 0.001)和更锋利的核(在大多数情况下为Bv72)作为最佳的支架内血管管腔可视化。评估不同的光谱重建(虚拟单能重建和碘重建)被证明是评估支架内血管内腔的最佳方法(p = 0.001)。结论:PCD-CTA和具有更清晰重建核的光谱重建和低keV值40似乎有利于获得最佳图像质量,用于评价ICS和FD。碘和虚拟单能重建优于纯管腔和多能重建评估支架内血管管腔。相关性声明:PCD-CTA为颅内支架(ICS)或分流器(FD)植入后的随访检查提供了减少侵入性血管造影的机会。重点:植入支架和分流器的颅内血管的神经成像受到伪影的限制。12例患者接受了9个分流器和6个颅内支架的光子计数检测器计算机断层血管造影(PCD-CTA)。使用锐利的重建核和低keV水平提高了支架内血管内腔的可见度。虚拟单能重建和碘重建是评估支架内血管腔的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Integration of detection and tracking networks for automated rib multiplanar reconstruction: a feasibility study for fracture diagnosis. Comparing CT-guided and fluoroscopic-guided interventions for chronic low back pain management: a randomized trial. ¹⁹F MRI radiomic features: in vitro and in vivo repeatability. Cerebrovascular CTA radiomics for objective collateral grading in acute ischemic stroke. Deep learning-based identification of chronic pulmonary embolism on CTPA: a regional lung analysis using multiplanar MIP images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1