Accuracy of Intra-Oral Scanners for Full Crown Tooth Preparations with Subgingival Margins: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2812Matias09
M Andrade Villalobos, V Bennani, J M Aarts, J Ratnayake
{"title":"Accuracy of Intra-Oral Scanners for Full Crown Tooth Preparations with Subgingival Margins: A Systematic Review.","authors":"M Andrade Villalobos, V Bennani, J M Aarts, J Ratnayake","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2812Matias09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The accuracy of intra-oral scanners (IOS) has not been thoroughly evaluated across all clinical scenarios, particularly in crown preparations with subgingival margins.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aims to assess the accuracy of IOS in tooth preparations with subgingival margins and identify factors influencing their performance in these situations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for studies published in the last five years. Quality Assessment Tool for In-Vitro Studies (QUIN) was used to evaluate study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 605 studies, seven met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review found that the trueness of IOS is significantly compromised in subgingival margins, often failing to achieve clinically acceptable results. Influencing factors included gingival retraction and saliva contamination. Specifically, cord retraction enhanced IOS accuracy, while saliva contamination reduced it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accuracy of IOS in crown preparations with subgingival margins is severely affected by saliva contamination and visibility issues. Clinically acceptable results are achieved with proper gingival retraction and a dry field.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>To ensure accurate scanning for tooth preparations with subgingival margins, achieving proper gingival retraction and dryness is crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2812Matias09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The accuracy of intra-oral scanners (IOS) has not been thoroughly evaluated across all clinical scenarios, particularly in crown preparations with subgingival margins.

Objectives: This systematic review aims to assess the accuracy of IOS in tooth preparations with subgingival margins and identify factors influencing their performance in these situations.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for studies published in the last five years. Quality Assessment Tool for In-Vitro Studies (QUIN) was used to evaluate study quality.

Results: Out of 605 studies, seven met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review found that the trueness of IOS is significantly compromised in subgingival margins, often failing to achieve clinically acceptable results. Influencing factors included gingival retraction and saliva contamination. Specifically, cord retraction enhanced IOS accuracy, while saliva contamination reduced it.

Conclusions: The accuracy of IOS in crown preparations with subgingival margins is severely affected by saliva contamination and visibility issues. Clinically acceptable results are achieved with proper gingival retraction and a dry field.

Clinical relevance: To ensure accurate scanning for tooth preparations with subgingival margins, achieving proper gingival retraction and dryness is crucial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Intra-Oral Scanners for Full Crown Tooth Preparations with Subgingival Margins: A Systematic Review. Description and Durability of the Various Direct Restoration Techniques in Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization: A Systematic Review. Does the Learning Curve for Intraoral Scanning Vary Depending on the Device? Influence of Surface Roughness on the Adhesion of Hydroxyapatite Coatings to Titanium and Titanium Alloy Surfaces: A Systematic Review of in vitro Experimental Studies. Performance of Fiberglass Posts Versus Fiber- Reinforced Resin Composites in Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Without Ferrule: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1