Trends in psychological distress during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a population-based Costa Rican cohort study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.017
Romain Fantin , Carolina Porras , Henriette Raventós , Alejandro Calderón , Amada Aparicio , Natalia Alba , Viviana Loria , Allan Hildesheim , Rolando Herrero , Cristina Barboza-Solís
{"title":"Trends in psychological distress during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a population-based Costa Rican cohort study","authors":"Romain Fantin ,&nbsp;Carolina Porras ,&nbsp;Henriette Raventós ,&nbsp;Alejandro Calderón ,&nbsp;Amada Aparicio ,&nbsp;Natalia Alba ,&nbsp;Viviana Loria ,&nbsp;Allan Hildesheim ,&nbsp;Rolando Herrero ,&nbsp;Cristina Barboza-Solís","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an increase of psychological distress. We hypothesized that the mental health of individuals has improved since the end of the pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>1459 population-based participants of the RESPIRA cohort study (Costa Rica)</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Psychological distress was measured at 6-month intervals using the Mental Health Inventory 5 (MHI-5) during the 2-year follow-up. Visits occurred between June 2021 and November 2023. Age-sex-standardized MHI-5 mean and proportion of individuals living with psychological distress were estimated by calendar time. We evaluated both cross-sectional estimates over time among all cohort participants, and within-individual evolution among the subset of 1341 participants with repeated measures between June 2021–June 2022 and January–November 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Standardized prevalence of people living with psychological distress was 13.6 % [10.8–16.8] during the height of the pandemic compared to 8.8 % [6.5–11.6] post-pandemic. The standardized MHI-5 mean increased from 76.3 [74.8–77.9] to 82.9 [81.6–84.3] between the height and post-pandemic periods. 14.5 % of the participants had a much better MHI-5 score (24 points or more) in the post-pandemic period compared to the height of the pandemic, and only 5.3 % had a much worse MHI-5 score. Consistent improvements were observed among sexes and across age, except for 12-17-year-olds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study showed a decrease in the proportion of people living with psychological distress in Costa Rica since the end of the pandemic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"240 ","pages":"Pages 88-94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625000381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an increase of psychological distress. We hypothesized that the mental health of individuals has improved since the end of the pandemic.

Study design

1459 population-based participants of the RESPIRA cohort study (Costa Rica)

Methods

Psychological distress was measured at 6-month intervals using the Mental Health Inventory 5 (MHI-5) during the 2-year follow-up. Visits occurred between June 2021 and November 2023. Age-sex-standardized MHI-5 mean and proportion of individuals living with psychological distress were estimated by calendar time. We evaluated both cross-sectional estimates over time among all cohort participants, and within-individual evolution among the subset of 1341 participants with repeated measures between June 2021–June 2022 and January–November 2023.

Results

Standardized prevalence of people living with psychological distress was 13.6 % [10.8–16.8] during the height of the pandemic compared to 8.8 % [6.5–11.6] post-pandemic. The standardized MHI-5 mean increased from 76.3 [74.8–77.9] to 82.9 [81.6–84.3] between the height and post-pandemic periods. 14.5 % of the participants had a much better MHI-5 score (24 points or more) in the post-pandemic period compared to the height of the pandemic, and only 5.3 % had a much worse MHI-5 score. Consistent improvements were observed among sexes and across age, except for 12-17-year-olds.

Conclusions

This study showed a decrease in the proportion of people living with psychological distress in Costa Rica since the end of the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间和之后的心理困扰趋势:基于哥斯达黎加人口的队列研究结果。
目的:新冠肺炎大流行导致心理困扰增加。我们假设,自大流行结束以来,个人的心理健康状况有所改善。研究设计:1459名基于人群的呼吸器队列研究(哥斯达黎加)参与者方法:在2年随访期间,使用心理健康量表5 (MHI-5)每隔6个月测量一次心理困扰。访问发生在2021年6月至2023年11月之间。年龄-性别标准化MHI-5均值和存在心理困扰个体的比例按日历时间估算。我们通过2021年6月至2022年6月和2023年1月至11月的重复测量,评估了所有队列参与者随时间的横断面估计,以及1341名参与者子集的个体内进化。结果:在大流行高峰期间,患有心理困扰的标准化患病率为13.6%[10.8-16.8],而大流行后为8.8%[6.5-11.6]。在高峰和大流行后期间,标准化MHI-5平均值从76.3[74.8-77.9]上升到82.9[81.6-84.3]。与大流行高峰期相比,14.5%的参与者在大流行后时期的MHI-5得分(24分或更高)要高得多,只有5.3%的参与者的MHI-5得分要差得多。除了12-17岁的青少年外,在性别和年龄上都观察到了一致的改善。结论:这项研究表明,自大流行结束以来,哥斯达黎加患有心理困扰的人口比例有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
An overview of artificial intelligence approaches for automating evidence synthesis Analysis of adult non-communicable disease (NCD) screening data in Uzbekistan using the UZ-SPEED NCD tool A cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of a blended care intervention in pregnancy and postpartum on weight, health behaviour, and mental health in women with low socio-economic status Exploring the validity of using the English index of Multiple Deprivation as a proxy for individual or household income The hidden burden of disease in Brazil: A quantitative comparison between official notifications and modeled estimates from the Global Burden of Disease study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1