Trends in psychological distress during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a population-based Costa Rican cohort study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.017
Romain Fantin, Carolina Porras, Henriette Raventós, Alejandro Calderón, Amada Aparicio, Natalia Alba, Viviana Loria, Allan Hildesheim, Rolando Herrero, Cristina Barboza-Solís
{"title":"Trends in psychological distress during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a population-based Costa Rican cohort study.","authors":"Romain Fantin, Carolina Porras, Henriette Raventós, Alejandro Calderón, Amada Aparicio, Natalia Alba, Viviana Loria, Allan Hildesheim, Rolando Herrero, Cristina Barboza-Solís","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an increase of psychological distress. We hypothesized that the mental health of individuals has improved since the end of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>1459 population-based participants of the RESPIRA cohort study (Costa Rica) METHODS: Psychological distress was measured at 6-month intervals using the Mental Health Inventory 5 (MHI-5) during the 2-year follow-up. Visits occurred between June 2021 and November 2023. Age-sex-standardized MHI-5 mean and proportion of individuals living with psychological distress were estimated by calendar time. We evaluated both cross-sectional estimates over time among all cohort participants, and within-individual evolution among the subset of 1341 participants with repeated measures between June 2021-June 2022 and January-November 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Standardized prevalence of people living with psychological distress was 13.6 % [10.8-16.8] during the height of the pandemic compared to 8.8 % [6.5-11.6] post-pandemic. The standardized MHI-5 mean increased from 76.3 [74.8-77.9] to 82.9 [81.6-84.3] between the height and post-pandemic periods. 14.5 % of the participants had a much better MHI-5 score (24 points or more) in the post-pandemic period compared to the height of the pandemic, and only 5.3 % had a much worse MHI-5 score. Consistent improvements were observed among sexes and across age, except for 12-17-year-olds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed a decrease in the proportion of people living with psychological distress in Costa Rica since the end of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"240 ","pages":"88-94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an increase of psychological distress. We hypothesized that the mental health of individuals has improved since the end of the pandemic.

Study design: 1459 population-based participants of the RESPIRA cohort study (Costa Rica) METHODS: Psychological distress was measured at 6-month intervals using the Mental Health Inventory 5 (MHI-5) during the 2-year follow-up. Visits occurred between June 2021 and November 2023. Age-sex-standardized MHI-5 mean and proportion of individuals living with psychological distress were estimated by calendar time. We evaluated both cross-sectional estimates over time among all cohort participants, and within-individual evolution among the subset of 1341 participants with repeated measures between June 2021-June 2022 and January-November 2023.

Results: Standardized prevalence of people living with psychological distress was 13.6 % [10.8-16.8] during the height of the pandemic compared to 8.8 % [6.5-11.6] post-pandemic. The standardized MHI-5 mean increased from 76.3 [74.8-77.9] to 82.9 [81.6-84.3] between the height and post-pandemic periods. 14.5 % of the participants had a much better MHI-5 score (24 points or more) in the post-pandemic period compared to the height of the pandemic, and only 5.3 % had a much worse MHI-5 score. Consistent improvements were observed among sexes and across age, except for 12-17-year-olds.

Conclusions: This study showed a decrease in the proportion of people living with psychological distress in Costa Rica since the end of the pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
Recreational marijuana legalization's impact and opioid death rates: A synthetic control approach. Trends in psychological distress during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a population-based Costa Rican cohort study. An assessment of the Chilean COVID-19 surveillance program through the comparison between reported and true SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence: A case study of three urban centers in southern Chile. Health impacts of cold exposure among people experiencing homelessness: A narrative systematic review on risks and risk-reduction approaches. The effects of socio-economic and environmental factors on Korean suicidal ideation: A Bayesian multilevel analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1