[Artículo traducido] Eficacia y seguridad de un adalimumab biosimilar en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.farma.2024.09.005
Jaime E. Poquet-Jornet , Inés Ibáñez-Sala , Teresa Garrigues-Pelufo , Adrián Munilla-Das , Antonio Valdivia-Pérez , Francisco Javier Carrera-Hueso
{"title":"[Artículo traducido] Eficacia y seguridad de un adalimumab biosimilar en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal","authors":"Jaime E. Poquet-Jornet ,&nbsp;Inés Ibáñez-Sala ,&nbsp;Teresa Garrigues-Pelufo ,&nbsp;Adrián Munilla-Das ,&nbsp;Antonio Valdivia-Pérez ,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Carrera-Hueso","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022 (Idacio®) has been approved for the same indications as its originator (Humira®), based on findings from clinical trials in plaque psoriasis. Data on its efficacy and safety in inflammatory bowel disease, however, are scarce.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective, observational study of 44 patients with inflammatory bowel disease: 30 were treated with originator adalimumab, five were directly started on MSB11022, and nine switched from originator to biosimilar adalimumab. To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease, both laboratory markers (fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein) and scales that measure the activity of inflammatory bowel disease using specific scales (Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] have been used for Crohn's disease and Mayo Score for ulcerative colitis). Efficacy was evaluated by recording the adverse effects that could occur with the administration of adalimumab (original or biosimilar). The success of the switch was determined by analyzing meaningful differences in effectiveness and safety criteria. Concomitant therapy and the need for dose intensification were also analyzed. Objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of biosimilar adalimumab in adalimumab-naïve patients and patients switched from originator adalimumab.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were observed in clinical disease activity (<em>p</em> = 0.317) or biochemical parameters (fecal calprotectin [<em>p</em> = 0.445] and C-reactive protein [<em>p</em> = 0.661]) after the switch from the originator adalimumab to MSB11022. There was not a significant reduction in the concomitant use of corticosteroids and thiopurines (<em>p</em> = 0.157). No emergency room visits or hospitalizations were observed during the study period and none of the patients experienced serious adverse effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Between originator adalimumab and biosimilar-start cohorts no differences were observed, between originator adalimumab and switch cohorts no significant differences were found either, and with the pre- and post-switch to biosimilar comparison two of the nine patients experienced adverse effects after the switch.</div><div>The biosimilar showed a favorable safety profile (one patient with a serious adverse effect [rash] with biosimilar discontinued treatment) and no significant changes to clinical or biochemical parameters were observed after the switch.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 2","pages":"Pages T65-T71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634324001545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022 (Idacio®) has been approved for the same indications as its originator (Humira®), based on findings from clinical trials in plaque psoriasis. Data on its efficacy and safety in inflammatory bowel disease, however, are scarce.

Methods

Retrospective, observational study of 44 patients with inflammatory bowel disease: 30 were treated with originator adalimumab, five were directly started on MSB11022, and nine switched from originator to biosimilar adalimumab. To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease, both laboratory markers (fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein) and scales that measure the activity of inflammatory bowel disease using specific scales (Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] have been used for Crohn's disease and Mayo Score for ulcerative colitis). Efficacy was evaluated by recording the adverse effects that could occur with the administration of adalimumab (original or biosimilar). The success of the switch was determined by analyzing meaningful differences in effectiveness and safety criteria. Concomitant therapy and the need for dose intensification were also analyzed. Objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of biosimilar adalimumab in adalimumab-naïve patients and patients switched from originator adalimumab.

Results

No significant differences were observed in clinical disease activity (p = 0.317) or biochemical parameters (fecal calprotectin [p = 0.445] and C-reactive protein [p = 0.661]) after the switch from the originator adalimumab to MSB11022. There was not a significant reduction in the concomitant use of corticosteroids and thiopurines (p = 0.157). No emergency room visits or hospitalizations were observed during the study period and none of the patients experienced serious adverse effects.

Conclusions

Between originator adalimumab and biosimilar-start cohorts no differences were observed, between originator adalimumab and switch cohorts no significant differences were found either, and with the pre- and post-switch to biosimilar comparison two of the nine patients experienced adverse effects after the switch.
The biosimilar showed a favorable safety profile (one patient with a serious adverse effect [rash] with biosimilar discontinued treatment) and no significant changes to clinical or biochemical parameters were observed after the switch.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿达木单抗生物类似药在炎症性肠病患者中的有效性和安全性。
背景:阿达木单抗生物仿制药MSB11022 (Idacio®)已被批准用于与其初始产品(Humira®)相同的适应症,基于斑块型银屑病的临床试验结果。然而,关于其在炎症性肠病中的有效性和安全性的数据很少。方法:对44例炎症性肠病患者进行回顾性观察性研究:30例接受起始药阿达木单抗治疗,5例直接开始使用MSB11022, 9例从起始药切换到阿达木单抗生物仿制药。为了评估使用阿达木单抗治疗炎症性肠病的有效性,使用实验室标志物(粪便钙保护蛋白和c反应蛋白)和使用特定量表测量炎症性肠病活动性的量表(已将哈维-布拉德肖指数[HBI]用于克罗恩病,将Mayo评分用于溃疡性结肠炎)。通过记录阿达木单抗(原药或生物仿制药)可能发生的不良反应来评估疗效。转换的成功是通过分析有效性和安全标准的有意义差异来确定的。同时分析了伴随治疗和剂量强化的必要性。本研究的目的是评估阿达木单抗生物仿制药在adalimumab-naïve患者和原药阿达木单抗切换患者中的有效性和安全性。结果:从阿达木单抗切换到MSB11022后,临床疾病活动性(p = 0.317)和生化参数(粪便钙保护蛋白[p = 0.445]和c反应蛋白[p = 0.661])均无显著差异。同时使用皮质类固醇和硫嘌呤没有显著减少(p = 0.157)。在研究期间,没有观察到急诊室就诊或住院,也没有患者出现严重的不良反应。结论:阿达木单抗起始组和生物仿制药起始组之间没有差异,阿达木单抗起始组和切换组之间也没有发现显著差异,并且在切换到生物仿制药之前和之后的比较中,9例患者中有2例在切换后出现不良反应。该生物仿制药显示出良好的安全性(一名患有严重不良反应(皮疹)的患者停止使用生物仿制药),并且在转换后未观察到临床或生化参数的显着变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
期刊最新文献
[Translated article] Is patient safety still a strategic priority? Is patient safety still a strategic priority? [Translated article] Multidrug-resistant extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in a hemodialysis patient treated with bedaquiline and tedizolid. A case report and a literature review. Adequacy of three-compartment parenteral nutrition bags to current European guidelines for adults: a simulation study. Making research accessible, breaking down barriers: the new frontier of clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1