Long-term outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (r-TAPP): a retrospective review of 434 consecutive cases by a single surgeon with 3-8 years of follow-up.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02220-9
Omar J Viera, Jorge L Florin, Kevin E Morales
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (r-TAPP): a retrospective review of 434 consecutive cases by a single surgeon with 3-8 years of follow-up.","authors":"Omar J Viera, Jorge L Florin, Kevin E Morales","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02220-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When evaluating the long-term follow-up of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (r-TAPP) approach to inguinal hernias, research remains limited due to small patient cohorts and shorter follow-up durations. The most significant research on inguinal hernia repair utilizing r-TAPP procedure includes follow-up periods of up to 2 years and examines approximately 150 cases. This article presents data from 434 consecutive r-TAPP procedures conducted on 324 patients, with follow-up ranging from a minimum of 3 years to 8 years. These procedures were performed between April 2016 and February 2021. Patients were seen in person for a follow-up appointment 2 weeks after surgery, with additional follow-ups conducted via phone at half a year, a full year, and yearly thereafter up to 8 years. Among the 324 patients, 107 patients presented with left-sided inguinal hernias (33%), 107 presented with right-sided inguinal hernias (33%), and 110 presented with bilateral inguinal hernias (33.95%). Patients' ages varied between 25 and 96 years, and their BMI ranged from 17.7 to 50.2 (mean: 26.9, median: 26.2). Total procedure time varied from 35 to 191 min (mean: 62 min, median: 54 min). Within this, the docking time averaged 6 min, ranging from 3 to 15 min. The console time, which constitutes the primary operative phase, averaged 43 min, with a range of 11-183 min. The ASA scores varied between 1 and 3 (mean: 2, median: 2). None of the 324 patients experienced major blood loss, required conversion to open surgery, or had to stay overnight; every patient was sent home on the day of the procedure. Follow-up rates included 86.9% at 3 years, 87.1% at 4 years, 86.7% at 5 years, 86.4% at 6 years, 89.7% at 7 years, and 87.5% at 8 years. Two hernia recurrences were reported out of the 324 patients with 434 hernias performed, and no patients reported chronic pain between 3 and 8 years post-operation. The r-TAPP procedure provides a secure and efficient repair with a low recurrence rate (0.46%), reduced chronic pain, and competitive operative times. Compared to laparoscopic repair, which has a median operative time of 79 min, r-TAPP showed average times of 54 min for left-lateral hernias, 53 min for right-lateral hernias, and 79 min for bilateral cases (Kakiashvili et al.). While slightly longer than open repair (median time of 44 min), with differences of about 10 min for unilateral and 35 min for bilateral cases, r-TAPP offers superior precision and outcomes, making it a valuable option for inguinal hernia repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02220-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When evaluating the long-term follow-up of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (r-TAPP) approach to inguinal hernias, research remains limited due to small patient cohorts and shorter follow-up durations. The most significant research on inguinal hernia repair utilizing r-TAPP procedure includes follow-up periods of up to 2 years and examines approximately 150 cases. This article presents data from 434 consecutive r-TAPP procedures conducted on 324 patients, with follow-up ranging from a minimum of 3 years to 8 years. These procedures were performed between April 2016 and February 2021. Patients were seen in person for a follow-up appointment 2 weeks after surgery, with additional follow-ups conducted via phone at half a year, a full year, and yearly thereafter up to 8 years. Among the 324 patients, 107 patients presented with left-sided inguinal hernias (33%), 107 presented with right-sided inguinal hernias (33%), and 110 presented with bilateral inguinal hernias (33.95%). Patients' ages varied between 25 and 96 years, and their BMI ranged from 17.7 to 50.2 (mean: 26.9, median: 26.2). Total procedure time varied from 35 to 191 min (mean: 62 min, median: 54 min). Within this, the docking time averaged 6 min, ranging from 3 to 15 min. The console time, which constitutes the primary operative phase, averaged 43 min, with a range of 11-183 min. The ASA scores varied between 1 and 3 (mean: 2, median: 2). None of the 324 patients experienced major blood loss, required conversion to open surgery, or had to stay overnight; every patient was sent home on the day of the procedure. Follow-up rates included 86.9% at 3 years, 87.1% at 4 years, 86.7% at 5 years, 86.4% at 6 years, 89.7% at 7 years, and 87.5% at 8 years. Two hernia recurrences were reported out of the 324 patients with 434 hernias performed, and no patients reported chronic pain between 3 and 8 years post-operation. The r-TAPP procedure provides a secure and efficient repair with a low recurrence rate (0.46%), reduced chronic pain, and competitive operative times. Compared to laparoscopic repair, which has a median operative time of 79 min, r-TAPP showed average times of 54 min for left-lateral hernias, 53 min for right-lateral hernias, and 79 min for bilateral cases (Kakiashvili et al.). While slightly longer than open repair (median time of 44 min), with differences of about 10 min for unilateral and 35 min for bilateral cases, r-TAPP offers superior precision and outcomes, making it a valuable option for inguinal hernia repair.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (r-TAPP): a retrospective review of 434 consecutive cases by a single surgeon with 3-8 years of follow-up. Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review of propensity-matched studies. Huscher modified technique for robotic pancreaticojejunostomy: a video report. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy among the da Vinci, hinotori, and Hugo robot-assisted surgery systems. Democratization in abdominal ablation therapies: The impact of percutaneous robotic assistance on accuracy-A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1