The attitudes of physicians toward nurse prescribing rights: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02756-z
Yu Wu, Jian Liu, Lovel Fornah, Zeping Yan, Lijun Meng, Shicai Wu
{"title":"The attitudes of physicians toward nurse prescribing rights: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yu Wu, Jian Liu, Lovel Fornah, Zeping Yan, Lijun Meng, Shicai Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02756-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing prescribing rights have been proposed in many countries, with physicians' attitudes playing an important role. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes of physicians toward nurse prescribing rights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of 112 Chinese physicians was conducted from January to March 2024. This study utilized a demographic information form, nurses' prescription right knowledge questions, and a scale to measure nurse-physician collaboration. The data was analyzed with IBM SPSS-21 software using descriptive and inferential statistics. We used the mean±standard deviation, frequencies and percentages to describe the demographic information, T-test, Chi-square test or Fisher' s exact test, and binary logistic regression analysis to analyze the correlated factors of the attitudes of physicians toward nurse prescribing rights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 112 physicians, 60 supported nurse prescribing rights, accounting for 53.57% of the total. The results of the single-factor analysis indicated significant differences in the aspects of sex. The binary logistic regression revealed that being female (OR = 0.195, 95%CI = 0.072 ∼ 0.529), having knowledge of nurse prescribing rights (OR = 1.513, 95%CI = 1.051 ∼ 2.176), and promoting nurse-physician collaboration (OR = 1.058, 95%CI = 1.032 ∼ 1.084) were the factors that correlated with physicians' attitudes toward nurse prescribing rights.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most physicians expressed a favorable attitude toward nurse prescribing rights. The results of this study will help advance the development of nurse prescribing rights and ultimately improve the quality of patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02756-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nursing prescribing rights have been proposed in many countries, with physicians' attitudes playing an important role. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes of physicians toward nurse prescribing rights.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of 112 Chinese physicians was conducted from January to March 2024. This study utilized a demographic information form, nurses' prescription right knowledge questions, and a scale to measure nurse-physician collaboration. The data was analyzed with IBM SPSS-21 software using descriptive and inferential statistics. We used the mean±standard deviation, frequencies and percentages to describe the demographic information, T-test, Chi-square test or Fisher' s exact test, and binary logistic regression analysis to analyze the correlated factors of the attitudes of physicians toward nurse prescribing rights.

Results: Of 112 physicians, 60 supported nurse prescribing rights, accounting for 53.57% of the total. The results of the single-factor analysis indicated significant differences in the aspects of sex. The binary logistic regression revealed that being female (OR = 0.195, 95%CI = 0.072 ∼ 0.529), having knowledge of nurse prescribing rights (OR = 1.513, 95%CI = 1.051 ∼ 2.176), and promoting nurse-physician collaboration (OR = 1.058, 95%CI = 1.032 ∼ 1.084) were the factors that correlated with physicians' attitudes toward nurse prescribing rights.

Conclusions: Most physicians expressed a favorable attitude toward nurse prescribing rights. The results of this study will help advance the development of nurse prescribing rights and ultimately improve the quality of patient care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医师对护士开处方权的态度:一项横断面研究。
背景:许多国家都提出了护理处方权,医生的态度起着重要作用。本研究旨在探讨医师对护士处方权的态度。方法:于2024年1月至3月对112名中国医师进行横断面研究。本研究采用人口统计信息表、护士处方权知识问题和量表来衡量护士-医生合作。使用IBM SPSS-21软件对数据进行描述性和推断性统计分析。我们采用均数±标准差、频率和百分比来描述人口学信息,采用t检验、卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,以及二元logistic回归分析医生对护士处方权态度的相关因素。结果:112名医师中,有60名支持护士的处方权,占总数的53.57%。单因素分析的结果表明,在性别方面存在显著差异。二元logistic回归分析显示,女性(OR = 0.195, 95%CI = 0.072 ~ 0.529)、了解护士开处方权(OR = 1.513, 95%CI = 1.051 ~ 2.176)、促进护医合作(OR = 1.058, 95%CI = 1.032 ~ 1.084)是影响医生对护士开处方权态度的相关因素。结论:大多数医师对护士的处方权持赞成态度。本研究的结果将有助于促进护士处方权的发展,并最终提高患者护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
"It's more than connecting tubes": a qualitative inquiry into nurses' emotional labor in dialysis units. Compassion under pressure: generational perspectives on burnout and inner resources in nursing practice. The effect of work life quality on job satisfaction in critical care nurses. Self-care practices among nurses at an academic institution in a conflict zone: a cross-sectional study. Effectiveness of a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle-based quality control circle in enhancing the research capacity of operating room nurses a pre-post intervention study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1