Evidence of content validity of the "Blood Transfusion Reaction" (code 0700) nursing outcome from the nursing outcomes classification.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Knowledge Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.70004
Adriana Aparecida Timoteo Simoes, Juliana de Lima Lopes, Sue Moorhead, Elizabeth A Swanson, Vinicius Batista Santos, Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros
{"title":"Evidence of content validity of the \"Blood Transfusion Reaction\" (code 0700) nursing outcome from the nursing outcomes classification.","authors":"Adriana Aparecida Timoteo Simoes, Juliana de Lima Lopes, Sue Moorhead, Elizabeth A Swanson, Vinicius Batista Santos, Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of study was to present evidence of the content validity of conceptual and operational definitions of the \"Blood Transfusion Reaction (code 0700)\" nursing outcome from the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A methodological study was implemented in four phases. The first phase consisted of a narrative literature review in which the main indicators related to blood transfusion were identified: 25 new indicators that were not present in NOC, in addition to 14 existing indicators, for a total of 39 to be studied. In the second phase, conceptual and operational definitions, and magnitude of NOC indicators were developed. The third phase consisted of analysis of evidence of content validity of conceptual and operational definitions of indicators, through assessment by experts. In the fourth phase, a pilot test was applied to 40 electronic medical records of patients who received blood components and presented with a transfusion reaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 articles were analyzed and served as support to develop conceptual and operational definitions, and magnitude of indicators, considered for the outcome under study. It was assessed by a group of 10 experts, requiring three rounds to reach the established critical content validity ratio in which four of these indicators were excluded, leaving 35 indicators in the final version. A pilot test on 40 records revealed the presence of 13 indicators, of which six were present in the classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conceptual and operational definitions and magnitude developed for the \"Blood Transfusion Reaction (code 0700)\" nursing outcome demonstrated adequate evidence of content validity in the 21 indicators found in the literature, along with 14 indicators already present in NOC, and 13 of these indicators were present in patients receiving blood components who presented a transfusion reaction.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Nurses can use this nursing outcome as a clinical assessment tool for monitoring blood transfusion recipients' clinical signs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of study was to present evidence of the content validity of conceptual and operational definitions of the "Blood Transfusion Reaction (code 0700)" nursing outcome from the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC).

Method: A methodological study was implemented in four phases. The first phase consisted of a narrative literature review in which the main indicators related to blood transfusion were identified: 25 new indicators that were not present in NOC, in addition to 14 existing indicators, for a total of 39 to be studied. In the second phase, conceptual and operational definitions, and magnitude of NOC indicators were developed. The third phase consisted of analysis of evidence of content validity of conceptual and operational definitions of indicators, through assessment by experts. In the fourth phase, a pilot test was applied to 40 electronic medical records of patients who received blood components and presented with a transfusion reaction.

Results: A total of 27 articles were analyzed and served as support to develop conceptual and operational definitions, and magnitude of indicators, considered for the outcome under study. It was assessed by a group of 10 experts, requiring three rounds to reach the established critical content validity ratio in which four of these indicators were excluded, leaving 35 indicators in the final version. A pilot test on 40 records revealed the presence of 13 indicators, of which six were present in the classification.

Conclusion: The conceptual and operational definitions and magnitude developed for the "Blood Transfusion Reaction (code 0700)" nursing outcome demonstrated adequate evidence of content validity in the 21 indicators found in the literature, along with 14 indicators already present in NOC, and 13 of these indicators were present in patients receiving blood components who presented a transfusion reaction.

Implications for practice: Nurses can use this nursing outcome as a clinical assessment tool for monitoring blood transfusion recipients' clinical signs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of nursing diagnoses identified at admission and discharge of patients with decompensated heart failure. Evidence of content validity of the "Blood Transfusion Reaction" (code 0700) nursing outcome from the nursing outcomes classification. Evaluating the accuracy of impaired skin integrity in critically ill patients: Key characteristics and clinical implications. Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis inadequate social support network in breastfeeding mothers: A cross-sectional study. The prevalence of self-neglect among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1