Diagonal loading common spatial patterns with Pearson correlation coefficient based feature selection for efficient motor imagery classification.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1080/10255842.2025.2457122
Hanaa S Ali, Asmaa I Ismail, El-Sayed M El-Rabaie, Fathi E Abd El-Samie
{"title":"Diagonal loading common spatial patterns with Pearson correlation coefficient based feature selection for efficient motor imagery classification.","authors":"Hanaa S Ali, Asmaa I Ismail, El-Sayed M El-Rabaie, Fathi E Abd El-Samie","doi":"10.1080/10255842.2025.2457122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The conversion of a person's intentions into device commands through the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) is a feasible communication method for individuals with nervous system disorders. While common spatial pattern (CSP) is commonly used for feature extraction in BCIs, it has limitations. It is known for its susceptibility to noise and tendency to overfit. Moreover, high-dimensional, and irrelevant features can make it harder for a classifier to learn effectively. To address these challenges, exploring potential solutions is crucial. This paper introduces Regularized CSP with diagonal loading (DL-CSP) and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) based feature selection to extract the most discriminative motor imagery EEG (MI-EEG) features. Three classifiers in an ensemble are considered; bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and naïve Bayes (NB). Decision level fusion through majority voting is exploited to leverage diverse perspectives and increase the overall system robustness. Experiments have been implemented using three publicly available datasets for MI classification; BCI competition IV-IIA (data-1), BCI Competition III-IVa (data-2), and a stroke patients' dataset (data-3). The accuracy achieved, according to the results, is 86.96% for data-1, 91.70% for data-2, and 85.75% for data-3. These percentages outperform the accuracy achieved by any state-of-the-art techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":50640,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2025.2457122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conversion of a person's intentions into device commands through the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) is a feasible communication method for individuals with nervous system disorders. While common spatial pattern (CSP) is commonly used for feature extraction in BCIs, it has limitations. It is known for its susceptibility to noise and tendency to overfit. Moreover, high-dimensional, and irrelevant features can make it harder for a classifier to learn effectively. To address these challenges, exploring potential solutions is crucial. This paper introduces Regularized CSP with diagonal loading (DL-CSP) and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) based feature selection to extract the most discriminative motor imagery EEG (MI-EEG) features. Three classifiers in an ensemble are considered; bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and naïve Bayes (NB). Decision level fusion through majority voting is exploited to leverage diverse perspectives and increase the overall system robustness. Experiments have been implemented using three publicly available datasets for MI classification; BCI competition IV-IIA (data-1), BCI Competition III-IVa (data-2), and a stroke patients' dataset (data-3). The accuracy achieved, according to the results, is 86.96% for data-1, 91.70% for data-2, and 85.75% for data-3. These percentages outperform the accuracy achieved by any state-of-the-art techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Pearson相关系数的特征选择对角加载常见空间模式,实现有效的运动图像分类。
通过脑机接口(BCI)将人的意图转化为设备指令是神经系统疾病患者可行的沟通方法。公共空间模式(CSP)是脑机接口中常用的特征提取方法,但存在一定的局限性。众所周知,它对噪声的敏感性和过度拟合的倾向。此外,高维和不相关的特征会使分类器更难有效地学习。为了应对这些挑战,探索潜在的解决方案至关重要。本文引入基于对角加载的正则化CSP (DL-CSP)和基于Pearson相关系数(PCC)的特征选择,提取最具判别性的运动意象脑电(MI-EEG)特征。在一个集合中考虑三个分类器;双向长短期记忆(Bi-LSTM)、k近邻记忆(KNN)和naïve贝叶斯(NB)。通过多数投票的决策级融合被用来利用不同的观点,并增加整个系统的鲁棒性。实验使用三个公开可用的数据集进行MI分类;BCI竞赛IV-IIA(数据1)、BCI竞赛III-IVa(数据2)和脑卒中患者数据集(数据3)。结果表明,数据1的准确率为86.96%,数据2为91.70%,数据3为85.75%。这些百分比比任何最先进的技术所达到的精度都要高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
179
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary aims of Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering are to provide a means of communicating the advances being made in the areas of biomechanics and biomedical engineering and to stimulate interest in the continually emerging computer based technologies which are being applied in these multidisciplinary subjects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering will also provide a focus for the importance of integrating the disciplines of engineering with medical technology and clinical expertise. Such integration will have a major impact on health care in the future.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing drug synergy in malignant diseases with deep architecture optimization algorithms. Advanced biomechanical assessment of mitral valve prosthesis using fluid-structure interaction modeling. Modeling and estimation of ablation catheter contact force under blood flow disturbance. Analysis of shoulder motion kinematics based on a spatial linkage model and validation using Vicon motion capture. A novel software design, simulation and analysis tool for lower extremity prosthesis performance test platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1