Biologic Augmented Scaffold-based cartilage repair: Addressing Complications and Enhancing Outcomes

Zachariah Gene Wing Ow , Marcus Wei Ping Tan , Dhivakaran Gengatharan , Edmund Jia Xi Zhang , Eric Wei Liang Cher , Pedro Debieux , Keng Lin Wong
{"title":"Biologic Augmented Scaffold-based cartilage repair: Addressing Complications and Enhancing Outcomes","authors":"Zachariah Gene Wing Ow ,&nbsp;Marcus Wei Ping Tan ,&nbsp;Dhivakaran Gengatharan ,&nbsp;Edmund Jia Xi Zhang ,&nbsp;Eric Wei Liang Cher ,&nbsp;Pedro Debieux ,&nbsp;Keng Lin Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cartilage repair remains a significant challenge due to the tissue's limited innate regenerative capacity. Despite advances in techniques such as microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), and osteochondral grafting, long-term outcomes are often compromised by complications, including suboptimal tissue integration, graft resorption, and mechanical instability. Recently, biologically augmented scaffold-based cartilage repair has emerged as a promising approach for full-thickness osteochondral lesions. These techniques combine acellular scaffolds with biologic agents, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrates (BMAC), to enhance tissue regeneration, reduce inflammation, and promote healing. However, postoperative complications—such as graft hypertrophy, arthrofibrosis, graft hypotrophy, and graft dislodgement—continue to pose challenges to successful outcomes. This paper presents case studies illustrating the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of these complications. Early recognition through clinical evaluation and imaging, followed by timely intervention, proved essential in mitigating the long-term effects of these complications. Although biologically augmented scaffolds offer potential advantages, variability in outcomes remains due to differences in biologic composition, scaffold design, and patient factors. The findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment strategies and adherence to postoperative rehabilitation protocols to reduce the risk of complications. Further research is needed to optimize biologic augmentation protocols and scaffold designs to improve long-term cartilage repair outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 102905"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cartilage repair remains a significant challenge due to the tissue's limited innate regenerative capacity. Despite advances in techniques such as microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), and osteochondral grafting, long-term outcomes are often compromised by complications, including suboptimal tissue integration, graft resorption, and mechanical instability. Recently, biologically augmented scaffold-based cartilage repair has emerged as a promising approach for full-thickness osteochondral lesions. These techniques combine acellular scaffolds with biologic agents, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrates (BMAC), to enhance tissue regeneration, reduce inflammation, and promote healing. However, postoperative complications—such as graft hypertrophy, arthrofibrosis, graft hypotrophy, and graft dislodgement—continue to pose challenges to successful outcomes. This paper presents case studies illustrating the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of these complications. Early recognition through clinical evaluation and imaging, followed by timely intervention, proved essential in mitigating the long-term effects of these complications. Although biologically augmented scaffolds offer potential advantages, variability in outcomes remains due to differences in biologic composition, scaffold design, and patient factors. The findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment strategies and adherence to postoperative rehabilitation protocols to reduce the risk of complications. Further research is needed to optimize biologic augmentation protocols and scaffold designs to improve long-term cartilage repair outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于生物增强支架的软骨修复:解决并发症和提高结果。
由于组织的先天再生能力有限,软骨修复仍然是一个重大挑战。尽管在微骨折、自体软骨细胞植入(ACI)和骨软骨移植等技术方面取得了进展,但长期结果往往受到并发症的影响,包括组织整合不佳、移植物吸收和机械不稳定。最近,基于生物增强支架的软骨修复已成为治疗全层骨软骨病变的一种很有前途的方法。这些技术将脱细胞支架与生物制剂(如骨髓抽吸浓缩液(BMAC))结合起来,以增强组织再生,减少炎症并促进愈合。然而,术后并发症,如移植物肥大、关节纤维化、移植物萎缩和移植物移位,继续对成功的结果构成挑战。本文介绍了这些并发症的临床表现、诊断和处理的病例研究。通过临床评估和影像学进行早期识别,然后及时干预,对于减轻这些并发症的长期影响至关重要。尽管生物增强支架具有潜在的优势,但由于生物成分、支架设计和患者因素的差异,结果仍然存在可变性。研究结果强调了个性化治疗策略和遵守术后康复方案以减少并发症风险的重要性。需要进一步的研究来优化生物增强方案和支架设计,以改善长期软骨修复的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
期刊最新文献
Concomitant prophylactic trochanteric epiphysiodesis may not be an effective procedure for Perthes varus surgery. Comparable healing, divergent function in tibia diaphyseal fractures stratified by age. Comparative efficacy of acute targeted muscle reinnervation after upper vs. lower limb amputation: A retrospective, global analysis Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis following tibial plateau fractures: A narrative review Anesthetic considerations in surgery for early onset scoliosis: Challenges and advancements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1