Job-exposure matrix (JEM) validity on crystalline silica among systemic sclerosis patients.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Occupational Medicine-Oxford Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqae133
M Touchard, A Bourgeois, B Thoreau, M Fadel, B Zavarsky, E Diot, A Lescoat, G Le Roux, A Descatha
{"title":"Job-exposure matrix (JEM) validity on crystalline silica among systemic sclerosis patients.","authors":"M Touchard, A Bourgeois, B Thoreau, M Fadel, B Zavarsky, E Diot, A Lescoat, G Le Roux, A Descatha","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the connective tissue disease with the highest individual mortality. Crystalline silica is known to be an occupational risk factor for SSc. To assess past crystalline silica exposure, we aimed to study the validity of a job exposure matrix (JEM) to assess occupational exposure to crystalline silica compared to specific occupational interviews in two populations of SSc patients.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To demonstrate the reliability of JEM for the assessment of occupational exposure to hazards such as silica, in severe rare disorders like SSc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from two university hospital centres underwent standardized assessment of occupational silica exposure and collected job histories through face-to-face interviews. A JEM from the French program Matgéné was used to assess silica exposure and compared to the standardized interview results. Standard metrics were computed for evaluate the accuracy of JEM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>67 participants from Rennes, and 119 from Tours were included, with respectively 10.5% and 18.0% of patients with silica exposure based on the results of the interview. The JEM with 50% probability cut-off had a good performance when compared with the classic assessment method. A cumulative exposure index from JEM over 250 had an area under the curve between 0.76 and 0.79 and also a very high positive likelihood ratio (17.14 and 10.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite limitations inherent to JEMs and associated validation methods, the JEM used in this setting provided accurate results to assess occupational exposure to crystalline silica for clinical purposes such as in SSc patients, especially to detect positive cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":54696,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Medicine-Oxford","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Medicine-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the connective tissue disease with the highest individual mortality. Crystalline silica is known to be an occupational risk factor for SSc. To assess past crystalline silica exposure, we aimed to study the validity of a job exposure matrix (JEM) to assess occupational exposure to crystalline silica compared to specific occupational interviews in two populations of SSc patients.

Aims: To demonstrate the reliability of JEM for the assessment of occupational exposure to hazards such as silica, in severe rare disorders like SSc.

Methods: Patients from two university hospital centres underwent standardized assessment of occupational silica exposure and collected job histories through face-to-face interviews. A JEM from the French program Matgéné was used to assess silica exposure and compared to the standardized interview results. Standard metrics were computed for evaluate the accuracy of JEM.

Results: 67 participants from Rennes, and 119 from Tours were included, with respectively 10.5% and 18.0% of patients with silica exposure based on the results of the interview. The JEM with 50% probability cut-off had a good performance when compared with the classic assessment method. A cumulative exposure index from JEM over 250 had an area under the curve between 0.76 and 0.79 and also a very high positive likelihood ratio (17.14 and 10.29).

Conclusions: Despite limitations inherent to JEMs and associated validation methods, the JEM used in this setting provided accurate results to assess occupational exposure to crystalline silica for clinical purposes such as in SSc patients, especially to detect positive cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Occupational Medicine-Oxford
Occupational Medicine-Oxford 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.90%
发文量
120
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Occupational Medicine is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides vital information for the promotion of workplace health and safety. The key strategic aims of the journal are to improve the practice of occupational health professionals through continuing education and to raise the profile of occupational health with key stakeholders including policy makers and representatives of employers and employees. Topics covered include work-related injury and illness, accident and illness prevention, health promotion, occupational disease, health education, the establishment and implementation of health and safety standards, monitoring of the work environment, and the management of recognized hazards. Contributions are welcomed from practising occupational health professionals and research workers in related fields.
期刊最新文献
Exploring psychological impact of hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). Evolution of stressors for healthcare workers over the COVID-19 pandemic. Job-exposure matrix (JEM) validity on crystalline silica among systemic sclerosis patients. Doctors with mental health difficulties and ADHD. Lymph node silicosis and recurrent tuberculosis in a short service goldminer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1