Crisis management in the operating room: A systematic review of simulation training to develop non-technical skills

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106583
Inas D. Redjem , Arnaud Huaulmé , Pierre Jannin , Estelle Michinov
{"title":"Crisis management in the operating room: A systematic review of simulation training to develop non-technical skills","authors":"Inas D. Redjem ,&nbsp;Arnaud Huaulmé ,&nbsp;Pierre Jannin ,&nbsp;Estelle Michinov","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Crises in the operating room, often resulting from human factors, endangers patient safety. Simulation-based training to develop non-technical skills shows promise in managing these crises. This review examines the simulation techniques, targeted healthcare professionals, non-technical skills, crisis scenarios, and evaluation metrics used in operating room crisis management training.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo and Web of Science databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2004 and March 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><div>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (<span><span>https://osf.io/7bsc8</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) The study population comprised healthcare and medical professionals or students; (2) the intervention involved a simulated learning or training experience; (3) the outcomes focused on non-technical skills or crew resource management; (4) the training setting was the operating room (simulated or real); and (5) the learning scenarios depicted a crisis or an adverse event.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This systematic review identified 29 eligible articles. The findings highlight the predominance of high-fidelity simulations, primarily targeting medical staff rather than nurses or other healthcare professionals. Training focused on communication, teamwork, situation awareness, problem solving, and decision making, with scenarios mostly addressing patient deterioration. Assessments reached up to Kirkpatrick's Level 3, demonstrating a positive training impact through learners' reactions and learning metrics rather than behavior and organizational results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite their effectiveness, current training practices exhibit limitations. Incorporating nurses and other paramedical staff in interprofessional training, as well as emphasizing team-related scenarios and evaluating behavioral changes in practice, could enhance training effectiveness. This has implications for interprofessional healthcare education and skills transfer to real-world settings, ultimately improving patient safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 106583"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725000188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Crises in the operating room, often resulting from human factors, endangers patient safety. Simulation-based training to develop non-technical skills shows promise in managing these crises. This review examines the simulation techniques, targeted healthcare professionals, non-technical skills, crisis scenarios, and evaluation metrics used in operating room crisis management training.

Design

Systematic review.

Data sources

MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo and Web of Science databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2004 and March 2024.

Review methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://osf.io/7bsc8). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) The study population comprised healthcare and medical professionals or students; (2) the intervention involved a simulated learning or training experience; (3) the outcomes focused on non-technical skills or crew resource management; (4) the training setting was the operating room (simulated or real); and (5) the learning scenarios depicted a crisis or an adverse event.

Results

This systematic review identified 29 eligible articles. The findings highlight the predominance of high-fidelity simulations, primarily targeting medical staff rather than nurses or other healthcare professionals. Training focused on communication, teamwork, situation awareness, problem solving, and decision making, with scenarios mostly addressing patient deterioration. Assessments reached up to Kirkpatrick's Level 3, demonstrating a positive training impact through learners' reactions and learning metrics rather than behavior and organizational results.

Conclusions

Despite their effectiveness, current training practices exhibit limitations. Incorporating nurses and other paramedical staff in interprofessional training, as well as emphasizing team-related scenarios and evaluating behavioral changes in practice, could enhance training effectiveness. This has implications for interprofessional healthcare education and skills transfer to real-world settings, ultimately improving patient safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术室危机管理:系统回顾模拟训练以发展非技术技能。
目的:手术室危机往往由人为因素引起,危及患者安全。以模拟为基础的培训,以发展非技术技能,在管理这些危机方面显示出希望。这篇综述检查了手术室危机管理培训中使用的模拟技术、目标医疗保健专业人员、非技术技能、危机场景和评估指标。设计:系统回顾。数据来源:MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo和Web of Science数据库检索2004年1月至2024年3月间发表的同行评议文章。评价方法:本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。审查方案已在开放科学框架(OSF) (https://osf.io/7bsc8)上注册。纳入标准如下:(1)研究人群为卫生保健和医学专业人员或学生;(2)干预涉及模拟学习或培训经历;(3)侧重于非技术技能或机组资源管理的成果;(4)培训环境为手术室(模拟或真实);(5)描述危机或不良事件的学习场景。结果:本系统评价确定了29篇符合条件的文章。研究结果强调了高保真模拟的优势,主要针对医务人员,而不是护士或其他医疗保健专业人员。培训的重点是沟通、团队合作、情况意识、解决问题和决策,主要是针对患者病情恶化的场景。评估达到了柯克帕特里克的第3级,通过学习者的反应和学习指标,而不是行为和组织结果,证明了积极的培训影响。结论:尽管他们的有效性,目前的培训实践表现出局限性。将护士和其他辅助医务人员纳入跨专业培训,以及强调与团队相关的情景和评估实践中的行为变化,可提高培训效果。这对跨专业医疗保健教育和技能转移到现实世界的设置有影响,最终提高患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Clinical training challenges in critical care units for nursing students: A qualitative content analysis Treatment fidelity in nursing education research: Striking a balance between rigor and real-world relevance as a contemporary challenge Thriving at work experiences among newly registered masters prepared nurses: A qualitative study Nursing students' evaluation of Primary Health Care clinical placements - A cross-sectional study Mapping strategies and outcomes of evidence-based practice training for clinical nurses: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1