Multiple needle insertion attempts: insights from a US survey of patients and nurses.

Anna Kiger, Michele Acito
{"title":"Multiple needle insertion attempts: insights from a US survey of patients and nurses.","authors":"Anna Kiger, Michele Acito","doi":"10.7748/nm.2025.e2147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Needle insertion, for example for venepuncture or intravenous (IV) cannulation, is a common intervention experienced by patients. However, up to half of venepuncture and IV cannulation procedures fail on the first attempt, resulting in further attempts. Multiple needle insertion attempts can lead to pain and other complications for patients and can take up staff time and increase equipment costs for hospitals, so it is important to ensure that needle insertion practices and outcomes are optimised. This article reports the results of a US survey that aimed to provide an insight into patients' and nurses' perspectives on and experiences of needle insertion. The results show that multiple needle insertion attempts are common and that associated complications have a detrimental effect on patients' satisfaction with the procedure. The results also suggest that patients and nurses are interested in alternatives to needle insertion, such as ultrasound guided IV cannulation or needle-free blood collection. Nurse leaders should be aware of these technologies and consider the implementation of sustainable initiatives to evolve practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74325,"journal":{"name":"Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nm.2025.e2147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Needle insertion, for example for venepuncture or intravenous (IV) cannulation, is a common intervention experienced by patients. However, up to half of venepuncture and IV cannulation procedures fail on the first attempt, resulting in further attempts. Multiple needle insertion attempts can lead to pain and other complications for patients and can take up staff time and increase equipment costs for hospitals, so it is important to ensure that needle insertion practices and outcomes are optimised. This article reports the results of a US survey that aimed to provide an insight into patients' and nurses' perspectives on and experiences of needle insertion. The results show that multiple needle insertion attempts are common and that associated complications have a detrimental effect on patients' satisfaction with the procedure. The results also suggest that patients and nurses are interested in alternatives to needle insertion, such as ultrasound guided IV cannulation or needle-free blood collection. Nurse leaders should be aware of these technologies and consider the implementation of sustainable initiatives to evolve practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiple needle insertion attempts: insights from a US survey of patients and nurses. Safeguarding older adults in residential care settings: lessons from Kouzes and Posner's transformational leadership model. Feedback in nursing practice: exploring barriers to and strategies for effective delivery. Hospital staff's experiences of unsafe staffing levels and employers' responses to their concerns: a survey. Strategies to attract school-leavers to nurse education programmes: an integrative literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1