Myocardial extracellular volume fraction estimations using late enhancement CT in patients with atrial fibrillation: a comparative study with cardiac MR.

IF 1.5 The international journal of cardiovascular imaging Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s10554-024-03316-3
Yoshihiko Kagawa, Masafumi Takafuji, Satoshi Fujita, Takanori Kokawa, Tomoyuki Fukuma, Masaki Ishida, Eitaro Fujii, Ryuji Okamoto, Kakuya Kitagawa, Hajime Sakuma, Kaoru Dohi
{"title":"Myocardial extracellular volume fraction estimations using late enhancement CT in patients with atrial fibrillation: a comparative study with cardiac MR.","authors":"Yoshihiko Kagawa, Masafumi Takafuji, Satoshi Fujita, Takanori Kokawa, Tomoyuki Fukuma, Masaki Ishida, Eitaro Fujii, Ryuji Okamoto, Kakuya Kitagawa, Hajime Sakuma, Kaoru Dohi","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03316-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV) measured via MRI serves as a quantitative indicator of myocardial fibrosis. However, accurate measurement of ECV using MRI in the presence of AF is challenging. Meanwhile, CT could be a promising alternative tool for measuring ECV regardless of sinus rhythm or AF. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of estimating ECV using CT in patients with AF by comparing it with MRI-derived ECV. Forty-two patients (n = 42) with AF underwent cardiac CT a median of 12 days before catheter ablation, and cardiac MRI a median of 1 day after catheter ablation. Myocardial ECV measured by CT and MRI was compared. Pre-ablation CT scan was performed in the presence of AF in 25 patients, with the remaining 17 in sinus rhythm (SR). All patients were in SR at the time of MRI post ablation. The average of CT-derived ECVs was 0.277 ± 0.022 and that of MRI-derived ECVs was 0.282 ± 0.019 in patients with AF. The average of CT-derived ECVs was 0.268 ± 0.025 and that of MRI-derived ECVs was 0.278 ± 0.025 in patients with SR at the time of the CT scan. CT and MRI were in good agreement with mean differences of -0.0048 ± 0.027 in AF and - 0.0095 ± 0.0354 in SR. CT-derived ECV in the presence of AF measured before ablation showed good agreement with ECV by MRI in SR after ablation. CT-ECV estimations are reliable and feasible in patients with AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"419-426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03316-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV) measured via MRI serves as a quantitative indicator of myocardial fibrosis. However, accurate measurement of ECV using MRI in the presence of AF is challenging. Meanwhile, CT could be a promising alternative tool for measuring ECV regardless of sinus rhythm or AF. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of estimating ECV using CT in patients with AF by comparing it with MRI-derived ECV. Forty-two patients (n = 42) with AF underwent cardiac CT a median of 12 days before catheter ablation, and cardiac MRI a median of 1 day after catheter ablation. Myocardial ECV measured by CT and MRI was compared. Pre-ablation CT scan was performed in the presence of AF in 25 patients, with the remaining 17 in sinus rhythm (SR). All patients were in SR at the time of MRI post ablation. The average of CT-derived ECVs was 0.277 ± 0.022 and that of MRI-derived ECVs was 0.282 ± 0.019 in patients with AF. The average of CT-derived ECVs was 0.268 ± 0.025 and that of MRI-derived ECVs was 0.278 ± 0.025 in patients with SR at the time of the CT scan. CT and MRI were in good agreement with mean differences of -0.0048 ± 0.027 in AF and - 0.0095 ± 0.0354 in SR. CT-derived ECV in the presence of AF measured before ablation showed good agreement with ECV by MRI in SR after ablation. CT-ECV estimations are reliable and feasible in patients with AF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心房颤动患者使用晚期增强CT评估心肌细胞外体积分数:与心脏MR的比较研究。
通过MRI测量心肌细胞外体积分数(ECV)可作为心肌纤维化的定量指标。然而,在房颤存在时,使用MRI精确测量ECV是具有挑战性的。同时,CT可能是一种很有前途的替代工具,用于测量窦性心律或房颤的ECV。本研究的目的是通过将CT与mri衍生的ECV进行比较,评估使用CT估计房颤患者ECV的可靠性。42例房颤患者(n = 42)在导管消融前平均12天接受心脏CT检查,在导管消融后平均1天接受心脏MRI检查。比较CT和MRI测量的心肌ECV。25例患者在房颤存在的情况下进行消融前CT扫描,其余17例为窦性心律(SR)。所有患者消融后MRI时均为SR。房颤患者CT衍生的ecv平均值为0.277±0.022,mri衍生的ecv平均值为0.282±0.019,SR患者CT衍生的ecv平均值为0.268±0.025,mri衍生的ecv平均值为0.278±0.025。CT和MRI结果吻合良好,AF的平均差值为-0.0048±0.027,SR的平均差值为- 0.0095±0.0354。消融前测量AF时CT衍生的ECV与消融后SR的MRI ECV结果吻合良好。CT-ECV估计在房颤患者中是可靠和可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Characteristics and prognostic value of "Ring-Like" late gadolinium enhancement - A systematic review of literature. Uhl's anomaly after Glenn shunt - clinical image of a rare congenital heart defect. A novel hybrid segmentation method coupled with deep learning for coronary artery extraction from coronary CT angiography. Manual long axis strain compared to automated feature-tracking deformation imaging for identification of masked left heart involvement in pulmonary hypertension. Beyond the heart: a pictorial review of extracardiac findings on cardiac CT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1