Association of a State-Wide Alternative Payment Model for Rural Hospitals With Bypass for Elective Surgeries

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14442
Donald S. Bourne, Zhaojun Sun, Bruce L. Jacobs, Coleman Drake, Jeremy M. Kahn, Eric T. Roberts, Lindsay M. Sabik
{"title":"Association of a State-Wide Alternative Payment Model for Rural Hospitals With Bypass for Elective Surgeries","authors":"Donald S. Bourne,&nbsp;Zhaojun Sun,&nbsp;Bruce L. Jacobs,&nbsp;Coleman Drake,&nbsp;Jeremy M. Kahn,&nbsp;Eric T. Roberts,&nbsp;Lindsay M. Sabik","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to measure the changes in rural hospital bypass for 11 common elective surgeries following the implementation of the Pennsylvania Rural Health Model (PARHM), a global budget payment model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Setting and Design</h3>\n \n <p>We leveraged a natural experiment arising from the phase-in of PHARM in Pennsylvania. We conducted a comparative interrupted time series analysis to assess changes in rural hospital bypass, comparing trends in rural hospital bypass among patients in hospital service areas (HSAs) with PARHM-participating hospitals to patients in control HSAs with hospitals eligible for but not participating in PARHM. Analyses accounted for staggered entry into PARHM and examined outcomes up to 4 years post-entry.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources and Analytic Sample</h3>\n \n <p>We used Pennsylvania all-payer visit-level inpatient discharge data (2016–2022) to measure rural hospital bypass, encompassing 175,138 surgeries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The average bypass rate for elective surgeries was 59.9%, with an increasing trend observed during the study period. Overall, differential changes in bypass rates between PARHM-participating and control HSAs were not statistically significant, from a low of 0.53 percentage points (−8.17–9.22) among Cohort 2 HSAs and a high of 5.96 percentage points (−4.63–16.55) among Cohort 1 HSAs. However, among critical access hospitals, PARHM participation was associated with a significant relative increase in levels and trends in bypass rates compared to controls, from a low of 9.12 percentage points (2.45–15.79) among Cohort 1 HSAs and a high of 29.70 percentage points (12.54–46.86) among Cohort 2 HSAs. These relative increases were largely due to a stable rate in PARHM-participating HSAs and a marked decrease in control HSAs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study fills a gap in the relationship between global budgets and hospital bypass. Although PARHM did not broadly alter rural bypass rates overall, the differential increase in bypass among HSAs with CAHs participating in PARHM suggests meaningful effect heterogeneity, warranting further research and analysis of impacts on patient outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6773.14442","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to measure the changes in rural hospital bypass for 11 common elective surgeries following the implementation of the Pennsylvania Rural Health Model (PARHM), a global budget payment model.

Study Setting and Design

We leveraged a natural experiment arising from the phase-in of PHARM in Pennsylvania. We conducted a comparative interrupted time series analysis to assess changes in rural hospital bypass, comparing trends in rural hospital bypass among patients in hospital service areas (HSAs) with PARHM-participating hospitals to patients in control HSAs with hospitals eligible for but not participating in PARHM. Analyses accounted for staggered entry into PARHM and examined outcomes up to 4 years post-entry.

Data Sources and Analytic Sample

We used Pennsylvania all-payer visit-level inpatient discharge data (2016–2022) to measure rural hospital bypass, encompassing 175,138 surgeries.

Principal Findings

The average bypass rate for elective surgeries was 59.9%, with an increasing trend observed during the study period. Overall, differential changes in bypass rates between PARHM-participating and control HSAs were not statistically significant, from a low of 0.53 percentage points (−8.17–9.22) among Cohort 2 HSAs and a high of 5.96 percentage points (−4.63–16.55) among Cohort 1 HSAs. However, among critical access hospitals, PARHM participation was associated with a significant relative increase in levels and trends in bypass rates compared to controls, from a low of 9.12 percentage points (2.45–15.79) among Cohort 1 HSAs and a high of 29.70 percentage points (12.54–46.86) among Cohort 2 HSAs. These relative increases were largely due to a stable rate in PARHM-participating HSAs and a marked decrease in control HSAs.

Conclusions

This study fills a gap in the relationship between global budgets and hospital bypass. Although PARHM did not broadly alter rural bypass rates overall, the differential increase in bypass among HSAs with CAHs participating in PARHM suggests meaningful effect heterogeneity, warranting further research and analysis of impacts on patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全国农村医院选择性旁路手术替代支付模式协会。
目的:本研究旨在衡量在实施宾夕法尼亚州农村卫生模式(PARHM)这一全球预算支付模式后,11种常见的选择性手术在农村医院旁路手术中的变化。研究设置和设计:我们利用了宾夕法尼亚州PHARM逐步引入的自然实验。我们进行了一项比较中断时间序列分析,以评估农村医院旁路手术的变化,比较医院服务区(HSAs)参与PARHM医院的患者与符合条件但未参与PARHM医院的对照HSAs患者的农村医院旁路手术趋势。分析考虑了错开进入PARHM,并检查了进入后4年的结果。数据来源和分析样本:我们使用宾夕法尼亚州所有付款人访问级别的住院出院数据(2016-2022)来测量农村医院分流,包括175,138例手术。主要发现:择期手术的平均搭桥率为59.9%,在研究期间有上升趋势。总体而言,参与parhm的HSAs与对照HSAs之间的搭桥率差异变化无统计学意义,队列2的搭桥率低0.53个百分点(-8.17-9.22),队列1的搭桥率高5.96个百分点(-4.63-16.55)。然而,在关键通道医院中,与对照组相比,PARHM的参与与搭桥率水平和趋势的显著相对增加有关,从队列1 HSAs的低9.12个百分点(2.45-15.79)到队列2 HSAs的高29.70个百分点(12.54-46.86)。这些相对增加主要是由于参与parhm的HSAs的稳定率和对照HSAs的显着下降。结论:本研究填补了全球预算与医院旁路手术之间关系的空白。尽管PARHM总体上没有广泛改变农村搭桥率,但参与PARHM的CAHs在HSAs之间搭桥率的差异增加表明了有意义的效应异质性,值得进一步研究和分析对患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Physical and Behavioral Health Diagnoses and Comorbidities Associated With Transition From Military Health System to Veterans Health Care Among Post-9/11 Veterans. Use of High- and Low-Value Care Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Medigap Impact of 340B Exposure on Treatment Utilization and Cost for Medicare Patients With Cancer Issue Information Too Sick to be True? Evaluating Potentially Problematic Diagnosis Coding Practices in Medicare's Patient-Driven Payment Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1