A risk prediction model for adult patients with difficult intravenous access.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1177/11297298251314909
Yijun Ji, Chang Liu, Xiuzhu Cao, Linfang Zhao
{"title":"A risk prediction model for adult patients with difficult intravenous access.","authors":"Yijun Ji, Chang Liu, Xiuzhu Cao, Linfang Zhao","doi":"10.1177/11297298251314909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The challenges posed by difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in clinical treatment are not only related to technical difficulties but also have the potential to affect the quality of patient care and overall experience. It is crucial to adopt effective strategies to address difficult intravenous access. Currently, the assessment of difficult veins largely relies on individual perception and experience, which introduces a significant degree of subjectivity.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and validate a risk prediction model for DIVA in adult patients, providing a tool for early identification and intervention.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data collection was conducted on 1170 hospitalized patients who required the placement of a short peripheral venous catheter for treatment in a tertiary hospital from June 1, 2022, to September 30, 2022, as the training set. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors influencing DIVA in adult patients and to construct a risk prediction model. Prospective data collection was conducted on 300 hospitalized patients from June 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023, for external validation. The discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and clinical decision curve, respectively. A TRIPOD checklist was used to guide the reporting of this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of patients in the training set was 58.60 ± 15.39 years. Among them, 626 were males (53.50%) and 544 were females (46.50%). The external validation group included a total of 300 patients with a mean age of 58.77 ± 15.26 years. There were 142 males (47.33%) and 158 females (52.67%). Advanced age, female sex, extreme weight (BMI <18.5 or >30), history of hemodialysis, axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer, compromised skin integrity, history of DIVA, and target cannula size ⩽20G are independent predictive factors for DIVA in adult patients (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The risk prediction model constructed based on these factors had an area under the ROC curve of 0.912 (95% CI 0.880-0.943) in the modeling group. The areas under the ROC curve in the internal and external validation groups were 0.887 (95% CI 0.855-0.924) and 0.870 (95% CI 0.799-0.942), respectively. Calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that intervening when the risk of venous puncture difficulty ranged from 3% to 91% yielded favorable clinical benefits for patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Constructing a risk prediction model for DIVA in adult patients has significant predictive value. It assists medical staff in early intervention and management for high-risk patients, thereby achieving effective prediction, warning, and control.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"2002-2010"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251314909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The challenges posed by difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in clinical treatment are not only related to technical difficulties but also have the potential to affect the quality of patient care and overall experience. It is crucial to adopt effective strategies to address difficult intravenous access. Currently, the assessment of difficult veins largely relies on individual perception and experience, which introduces a significant degree of subjectivity.

Aim: To develop and validate a risk prediction model for DIVA in adult patients, providing a tool for early identification and intervention.

Design: An observational study.

Methods: Retrospective data collection was conducted on 1170 hospitalized patients who required the placement of a short peripheral venous catheter for treatment in a tertiary hospital from June 1, 2022, to September 30, 2022, as the training set. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors influencing DIVA in adult patients and to construct a risk prediction model. Prospective data collection was conducted on 300 hospitalized patients from June 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023, for external validation. The discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and clinical decision curve, respectively. A TRIPOD checklist was used to guide the reporting of this study.

Results: The average age of patients in the training set was 58.60 ± 15.39 years. Among them, 626 were males (53.50%) and 544 were females (46.50%). The external validation group included a total of 300 patients with a mean age of 58.77 ± 15.26 years. There were 142 males (47.33%) and 158 females (52.67%). Advanced age, female sex, extreme weight (BMI <18.5 or >30), history of hemodialysis, axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer, compromised skin integrity, history of DIVA, and target cannula size ⩽20G are independent predictive factors for DIVA in adult patients (all p < 0.05). The risk prediction model constructed based on these factors had an area under the ROC curve of 0.912 (95% CI 0.880-0.943) in the modeling group. The areas under the ROC curve in the internal and external validation groups were 0.887 (95% CI 0.855-0.924) and 0.870 (95% CI 0.799-0.942), respectively. Calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that intervening when the risk of venous puncture difficulty ranged from 3% to 91% yielded favorable clinical benefits for patients.

Conclusion: Constructing a risk prediction model for DIVA in adult patients has significant predictive value. It assists medical staff in early intervention and management for high-risk patients, thereby achieving effective prediction, warning, and control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人静脉注射困难患者的风险预测模型。
背景:静脉注射困难(DIVA)在临床治疗中所带来的挑战不仅与技术困难有关,而且有可能影响患者的护理质量和整体体验。采取有效战略解决静脉注射困难问题至关重要。目前,难度静脉的评估在很大程度上依赖于个人的感知和经验,这引入了很大程度的主观性。目的:建立并验证成人DIVA风险预测模型,为早期识别和干预提供工具。设计:观察性研究。方法:回顾性收集某三级医院2022年6月1日至2022年9月30日1170例需要放置短周静脉导管治疗的住院患者的资料,作为训练集。采用Logistic回归分析确定成人患者DIVA的影响因素,构建风险预测模型。前瞻性数据收集于2023年6月1日至2023年6月30日300例住院患者进行外部验证。分别用受试者工作特征曲线下面积、校准曲线下面积和临床决策曲线下面积来评价模型的判别能力、校准和临床效用。使用三角架检查表来指导本研究的报告。结果:训练组患者的平均年龄为58.60±15.39岁。其中,男性626例(53.50%),女性544例(46.50%)。外部验证组共纳入300例患者,平均年龄58.77±15.26岁。男性142例(47.33%),女性158例(52.67%)。高龄、女性、极端体重(BMI 30)、血液透析史、乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫、皮肤完整性受损、DIVA史、目标插管尺寸≥20G是成人DIVA的独立预测因素(均p)。结论:构建成人DIVA风险预测模型具有显著的预测价值。帮助医护人员对高危患者进行早期干预和管理,实现有效的预测、预警和控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Port REMoval Outcomes (PREMO) study: A pilot study for functional, microbial, radiological, and macroscopic assessment of totally implantable venous access devices. Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization with acoustic shadowing technique: A randomized controlled trial. Arteriovenous fistula after distal transradial access: A case report and literature review. Evaluating needle-free connectors associated backflow in Midline and peripherally inserted central catheters: A top bench study. Short-term tunneling of centrally inserted central venous catheters without additional kits: A practical, safe, and emergency-applicable technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1