Reopenable clip over-the-line method in endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric submucosal tumors: A historical control study

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY DEN open Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70067
Satoki Shichijo, Noriya Uedo, Hitoshi Mori, Yushi Kawakami, Yasuhiro Tani, Hiroyoshi Iwagami, Minoru Kato, Shunsuke Yoshii, Takashi Kanesaka, Koji Higashino, Tomoki Michida, Ryu Ishihara, Naoki Shinno, Hisashi Hara, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Takeshi Omori
{"title":"Reopenable clip over-the-line method in endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric submucosal tumors: A historical control study","authors":"Satoki Shichijo,&nbsp;Noriya Uedo,&nbsp;Hitoshi Mori,&nbsp;Yushi Kawakami,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Tani,&nbsp;Hiroyoshi Iwagami,&nbsp;Minoru Kato,&nbsp;Shunsuke Yoshii,&nbsp;Takashi Kanesaka,&nbsp;Koji Higashino,&nbsp;Tomoki Michida,&nbsp;Ryu Ishihara,&nbsp;Naoki Shinno,&nbsp;Hisashi Hara,&nbsp;Yoshitomo Yanagimoto,&nbsp;Kazuyoshi Yamamoto,&nbsp;Takeshi Omori","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors is gradually gaining popularity, and secure and amenable closure is key to its success. This study aimed to compare the reopenable clip over-the-line method with the purse-string method for defect closure after endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This historical control trial included 37 consecutive patients with 37 gastric submucosal tumors, who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection between January 2021 and July 2024. All lesions were resected en bloc. After excluding three patients who underwent non-full-thickness resection, 34 patients were analyzed. Post-endoscopic full-thickness resection defects were closed using the purse-string method (<i>n</i> = 18) until 2022 and the reopenable clip over-the-line method (<i>n</i> = 16) from 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median (interquartile range) time for defect closure was longer in the reopenable clip over-the-line method group of 33 (31–57) min than in the purse-string method group of 26 (24–35) min (<i>p</i> = 0.013). The visual analog scale pain score at the umbilical region was lower (<i>p</i> = 0.048) after the reopenable clip over-the-line method than after the purse-string method. In the reopenable clip over-the-line method group, post-procedural abdominal pain was confined to the epigastrium, whereas it extended to the umbilical or left lateral regions in the purse-string method group. The reopenable clip over-the-line method group commenced the diet (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and discharged (<i>p</i> = 0.024) earlier than the purse-string method group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Reopenable clip over-the-line method facilitated secure post-endoscopic full-thickness resection defect closure, reduced post-procedural abdominal pain, and shortened the fasting and hospitalization periods after endoscopic full-thickness resection in gastric submucosal tumors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors is gradually gaining popularity, and secure and amenable closure is key to its success. This study aimed to compare the reopenable clip over-the-line method with the purse-string method for defect closure after endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors.

Methods

This historical control trial included 37 consecutive patients with 37 gastric submucosal tumors, who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection between January 2021 and July 2024. All lesions were resected en bloc. After excluding three patients who underwent non-full-thickness resection, 34 patients were analyzed. Post-endoscopic full-thickness resection defects were closed using the purse-string method (n = 18) until 2022 and the reopenable clip over-the-line method (n = 16) from 2023.

Results

The median (interquartile range) time for defect closure was longer in the reopenable clip over-the-line method group of 33 (31–57) min than in the purse-string method group of 26 (24–35) min (p = 0.013). The visual analog scale pain score at the umbilical region was lower (p = 0.048) after the reopenable clip over-the-line method than after the purse-string method. In the reopenable clip over-the-line method group, post-procedural abdominal pain was confined to the epigastrium, whereas it extended to the umbilical or left lateral regions in the purse-string method group. The reopenable clip over-the-line method group commenced the diet (p = 0.001) and discharged (p = 0.024) earlier than the purse-string method group.

Conclusions

Reopenable clip over-the-line method facilitated secure post-endoscopic full-thickness resection defect closure, reduced post-procedural abdominal pain, and shortened the fasting and hospitalization periods after endoscopic full-thickness resection in gastric submucosal tumors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下胃粘膜下肿瘤全层切除的可开夹过线法:一项历史对照研究。
目的:内镜下胃粘膜下肿瘤全层切除术正逐渐普及,安全、易操作的闭合是其成功的关键。本研究旨在比较内镜下胃粘膜下肿瘤全层切除后可开夹过线法与荷包线法的缺损闭合效果。方法:该历史对照试验纳入了37例连续的37例胃粘膜下肿瘤患者,这些患者于2021年1月至2024年7月期间接受了内镜全层切除术。所有病变全部切除。在排除3例接受非全层切除的患者后,分析了34例患者。内镜后全层切除缺损采用荷包缝合法(n = 18)至2022年,自2023年起采用可开夹过线缝合法(n = 16)。结果:可开夹线上法组缺损闭合的中位时间(四分位间距)为33 (31-57)min,比荷包法组的26 (24-35)min要长(p = 0.013)。可开夹线上法与荷包线法相比,脐区视觉模拟疼痛评分较低(p = 0.048)。在可开夹线上法组,术后腹痛局限于上腹部,而在荷包线法组,术后腹痛扩展到脐或左侧区域。可开夹过线法组开始饮食(p = 0.001)和出院(p = 0.024)早于荷包法组。结论:可开夹过线法有利于胃粘膜下肿瘤内镜下全层切除术后缺损的安全闭合,减少术后腹痛,缩短内镜下全层切除术后的禁食和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Small Hepatoid Variant of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Unique Case With Long-term Follow-up. Gastroptosis as a Risk Factor of Stent Migration After Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Hepaticogastrostomy: A Case Report. A Case of Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor With a Raspberry-Like Appearance on the Background of Acid-Suppressive Therapy-Related Gastropathy. Evaluation of Delayed Bleeding Prevention and Sustained Closure Using the Reopenable Clip-Over-the-Line Method for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. A Rare Case of Obstructive Jaundice Secondary to Hemobilia Post Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Liver Biopsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1