Is Routine Group and Save Sampling Necessary for Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy?

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.78086
Simeon Harrow, Aaruran Nadarajasundaram
{"title":"Is Routine Group and Save Sampling Necessary for Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy?","authors":"Simeon Harrow, Aaruran Nadarajasundaram","doi":"10.7759/cureus.78086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Laparoscopic appendicectomy is a commonly used approach for the surgical management of acute appendicitis. If complications arise, a blood transfusion may be necessary for patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy. The need for routine group and save (G&S) sampling prior to emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy remains a subject of ongoing discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether routine G&S sampling is needed prior to emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy. Methods The present study retrospectively reviewed G&S sampling for emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy cases over a six-month period at two hospital sites in the United Kingdom: Croydon University Hospital (June 1, 2024, to November 30, 2024) and Tunbridge Wells Hospital (October 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024). A total of 304 patients across both sites were included in the review. Results In 2023, 23 procedures (7.6%) were performed, while 279 procedures (92.4%) occurred in 2024. The patient population consisted of 46.4% males (<i>n = 141</i>) and 53.6% females (<i>n = 163</i>), with a mean age of 37.1 years (median 33, range 6-84). A total of 406 G&S samples were collected, of which 351 (86.5%) were processed and 55 (13.5%) were rejected by the blood bank. From the sample size, only one patient received a blood transfusion prior to surgery due to a low hemoglobin level of 72 g/L, likely resulting from the delayed presentation of a perforated appendix. Conclusion This study suggests that omitting routine G&S sampling is safe for patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy. Hence, an individualized risk assessment approach should be used to identify high-risk patients requiring preoperative G&S sampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 1","pages":"e78086"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.78086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic appendicectomy is a commonly used approach for the surgical management of acute appendicitis. If complications arise, a blood transfusion may be necessary for patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy. The need for routine group and save (G&S) sampling prior to emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy remains a subject of ongoing discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether routine G&S sampling is needed prior to emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy. Methods The present study retrospectively reviewed G&S sampling for emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy cases over a six-month period at two hospital sites in the United Kingdom: Croydon University Hospital (June 1, 2024, to November 30, 2024) and Tunbridge Wells Hospital (October 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024). A total of 304 patients across both sites were included in the review. Results In 2023, 23 procedures (7.6%) were performed, while 279 procedures (92.4%) occurred in 2024. The patient population consisted of 46.4% males (n = 141) and 53.6% females (n = 163), with a mean age of 37.1 years (median 33, range 6-84). A total of 406 G&S samples were collected, of which 351 (86.5%) were processed and 55 (13.5%) were rejected by the blood bank. From the sample size, only one patient received a blood transfusion prior to surgery due to a low hemoglobin level of 72 g/L, likely resulting from the delayed presentation of a perforated appendix. Conclusion This study suggests that omitting routine G&S sampling is safe for patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy. Hence, an individualized risk assessment approach should be used to identify high-risk patients requiring preoperative G&S sampling.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否需要常规分组和保留抽样?
背景腹腔镜阑尾切除术是急性阑尾炎手术治疗的常用方法。如果出现并发症,急诊阑尾切除术患者可能需要输血。急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术前是否需要常规组和保存(G&S)取样仍是一个正在讨论的主题。本研究的目的是评估急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术前是否需要常规G&S取样。方法回顾性分析英国克罗伊登大学医院(2024年6月1日至2024年11月30日)和坦布里奇韦尔斯医院(2023年10月1日至2024年4月30日)两家医院急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术病例的G&S抽样资料。两处共304名患者被纳入本综述。结果2023年共完成23例(7.6%),2024年共完成279例(92.4%)。患者人群中男性141人(46.4%),女性163人(53.6%),平均年龄37.1岁(中位33岁,范围6-84岁)。共采集G&S样本406份,其中处理351份(86.5%),被血库拒收55份(13.5%)。从样本量来看,只有一名患者在手术前接受了输血,原因是血红蛋白水平低至72 g/L,可能是由于阑尾穿孔的延迟出现。结论急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者无需常规G&S取样是安全的。因此,应采用个性化的风险评估方法来识别需要术前G&S取样的高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
World Kidney Day as a Platform for Action: Early Outcomes of a Vascular Access Mission in Sub-Saharan Africa. Understanding Hepatic Encephalopathy: Patient Knowledge, Adherence, and Barriers to Care in Cirrhosis. Chemo-Nonresponsive Telangiectatic Osteosarcoma With Oligometastatic Recurrence Managed With Multimodality Therapy Including Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR): A Case Report With a Pathologic Treatment Effect. Out-of-Pocket Expenditure and Catastrophic Health Spending Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Rural Tamil Nadu: A Cross-Sectional Study. Delayed Diagnosis of Thyroid Storm Presenting With Predominant Gastrointestinal Symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1