Comparison of automated and manual intracellular particle tracking using quantitative phase imaging.

IF 1.5 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 OPTICS Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1364/JOSAA.534154
Alyssa L Harpring, Soorya Pradeep, Thomas A Zangle
{"title":"Comparison of automated and manual intracellular particle tracking using quantitative phase imaging.","authors":"Alyssa L Harpring, Soorya Pradeep, Thomas A Zangle","doi":"10.1364/JOSAA.534154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transport within cells is commonly studied using particle tracking methods. However, these typically require either labeling or identification of specific organelles that can be identified and tracked from label-free imaging modalities, limiting application of this approach. Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) provides dynamic data on the redistribution of mass within live cells, potentially enabling broader application of particle tracking methods. In previous work, we developed quantitative phase velocimetry (QPV) to automatically track the motion of subcellular control volumes from QPI data. However, the relationship of QPV to traditional particle tracking methods has not been established. Here, we directly compare QPV to manual particle tracking across multiple drug treatment conditions. We find that QPV effective diffusivity is correlated with diffusivity measured from manual particle tracking. The differences between QPV and manual tracking are explained by the difference in effective size of particles tracked by QPV. Overall, these data indicate that automated tracking of the motion of cellular mass from QPI data can effectively be used to characterize effective diffusivity within living cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":17382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision","volume":"41 11","pages":"C49-C54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.534154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transport within cells is commonly studied using particle tracking methods. However, these typically require either labeling or identification of specific organelles that can be identified and tracked from label-free imaging modalities, limiting application of this approach. Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) provides dynamic data on the redistribution of mass within live cells, potentially enabling broader application of particle tracking methods. In previous work, we developed quantitative phase velocimetry (QPV) to automatically track the motion of subcellular control volumes from QPI data. However, the relationship of QPV to traditional particle tracking methods has not been established. Here, we directly compare QPV to manual particle tracking across multiple drug treatment conditions. We find that QPV effective diffusivity is correlated with diffusivity measured from manual particle tracking. The differences between QPV and manual tracking are explained by the difference in effective size of particles tracked by QPV. Overall, these data indicate that automated tracking of the motion of cellular mass from QPI data can effectively be used to characterize effective diffusivity within living cells.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用定量相位成像的自动和手动细胞内颗粒跟踪的比较。
细胞内的运输通常使用粒子跟踪方法进行研究。然而,这些通常需要标记或识别特定的细胞器,这些细胞器可以通过无标记成像方式识别和跟踪,限制了该方法的应用。定量相位成像(QPI)提供了活细胞内质量再分布的动态数据,可能使粒子跟踪方法的应用更加广泛。在之前的工作中,我们开发了定量相速度法(QPV),从QPI数据中自动跟踪亚细胞控制体的运动。然而,QPV与传统粒子跟踪方法之间的关系尚未建立。在这里,我们直接比较了QPV和手动粒子跟踪在多种药物治疗条件下。我们发现QPV的有效扩散系数与人工粒子跟踪测量的扩散系数相关。QPV与人工跟踪的区别在于QPV跟踪的粒子有效粒径的差异。总的来说,这些数据表明,从QPI数据中自动跟踪细胞质量的运动可以有效地用于表征活细胞内的有效扩散率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
417
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Optical Society of America A (JOSA A) is devoted to developments in any field of classical optics, image science, and vision. JOSA A includes original peer-reviewed papers on such topics as: * Atmospheric optics * Clinical vision * Coherence and Statistical Optics * Color * Diffraction and gratings * Image processing * Machine vision * Physiological optics * Polarization * Scattering * Signal processing * Thin films * Visual optics Also: j opt soc am a.
期刊最新文献
Analytical aberration theory for plane-symmetric optical systems and its application in distortion analysis of spectrometers: erratum. Dual-stage encryption framework for secure 3D information hiding using single-pixel imaging and diffusion models. Common issues and human intervention in object detection from handcrafted features to deep learning: discussion. Developing variants of the Lucy-Richardson algorithm for coded aperture imaging: tutorial. Disorder effect in a 2D array of spherical particles on the electromagnetic field on their surface.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1