Polygenic Susceptibility to Diabetes and Poor Glycemic Control in Stroke Survivors.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000210276
Zachariah S Demarais, Carolyn Conlon, Cyprien A Rivier, Santiago Clocchiatti-Tuozzo, Daniela Renedo, Victor Torres-Lopez, Kevin N Sheth, Daniella Meeker, Hongyu Zhao, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Julian N Acosta, Shufan Huo, Guido J Falcone
{"title":"Polygenic Susceptibility to Diabetes and Poor Glycemic Control in Stroke Survivors.","authors":"Zachariah S Demarais, Carolyn Conlon, Cyprien A Rivier, Santiago Clocchiatti-Tuozzo, Daniela Renedo, Victor Torres-Lopez, Kevin N Sheth, Daniella Meeker, Hongyu Zhao, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Julian N Acosta, Shufan Huo, Guido J Falcone","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000210276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is highly genetically determined, and polygenic susceptibility to T2DM (PSD) increases the risk of worse glycemic control and adverse vascular outcomes. Its role in stroke patients remains unknown. We aim to determine whether higher PSD is associated with worse glycemic control in stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 2-stage genetic association study. In a cross-sectional design, we selected stroke survivors from the UK Biobank (enrollment between 2006 and 2010) to evaluate the relationship between PSD and glycemic control. Second, we replicated the results using data from All of Us (enrollment between 2018 and 2022). Exposures were low, intermediate, and high PSD, modeled through percentiles (<20, 20-80, >80) of a polygenic risk score of 2,522 independent risk variants associated with T2DM at genome-wide levels (<i>p</i> < 5 × 10<sup>-8</sup>). Outcomes were hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥7.0%), and resistant diabetes (uncontrolled despite antidiabetic treatment).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stage 1 included 6,908 stroke survivors (mean age 61 years, 42% female), including 977 (14%) with diabetes. Compared with low PSD, participants with high PSD had an increase of 0.49 in HbA1c (β = 0.49, standard error 0.03, <i>p</i>-trend <0.001), 6.9 times the odds of uncontrolled diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 6.92, 95% CI 4.71-10.52), and 7.8 times the odds of resistant diabetes (OR 7.76, 95% CI 4.92-12.89). Stage 2 (replication) confirmed the association with HbA1c in 4,451 stroke survivors, including 2,163 (49%) with diabetes (mean age 64 years, 53% female, <i>p</i>-trend <0.05 for all tests).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Among stroke survivors, a higher PSD was associated with poorer glycemic control. Further research should determine precision medicine strategies using PSD to improve clinical management of stroke patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"104 4","pages":"e210276"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is highly genetically determined, and polygenic susceptibility to T2DM (PSD) increases the risk of worse glycemic control and adverse vascular outcomes. Its role in stroke patients remains unknown. We aim to determine whether higher PSD is associated with worse glycemic control in stroke survivors.

Methods: We conducted a 2-stage genetic association study. In a cross-sectional design, we selected stroke survivors from the UK Biobank (enrollment between 2006 and 2010) to evaluate the relationship between PSD and glycemic control. Second, we replicated the results using data from All of Us (enrollment between 2018 and 2022). Exposures were low, intermediate, and high PSD, modeled through percentiles (<20, 20-80, >80) of a polygenic risk score of 2,522 independent risk variants associated with T2DM at genome-wide levels (p < 5 × 10-8). Outcomes were hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥7.0%), and resistant diabetes (uncontrolled despite antidiabetic treatment).

Results: Stage 1 included 6,908 stroke survivors (mean age 61 years, 42% female), including 977 (14%) with diabetes. Compared with low PSD, participants with high PSD had an increase of 0.49 in HbA1c (β = 0.49, standard error 0.03, p-trend <0.001), 6.9 times the odds of uncontrolled diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 6.92, 95% CI 4.71-10.52), and 7.8 times the odds of resistant diabetes (OR 7.76, 95% CI 4.92-12.89). Stage 2 (replication) confirmed the association with HbA1c in 4,451 stroke survivors, including 2,163 (49%) with diabetes (mean age 64 years, 53% female, p-trend <0.05 for all tests).

Discussion: Among stroke survivors, a higher PSD was associated with poorer glycemic control. Further research should determine precision medicine strategies using PSD to improve clinical management of stroke patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风幸存者对糖尿病的多基因易感性和血糖控制不良。
背景和目的:2型糖尿病(T2DM)是高度遗传决定的,对T2DM (PSD)的多基因易感性增加了血糖控制恶化和不良血管结局的风险。它在中风患者中的作用尚不清楚。我们的目的是确定卒中幸存者中较高的PSD是否与较差的血糖控制有关。方法:我们进行了两个阶段的遗传关联研究。在横断面设计中,我们从英国生物银行(UK Biobank)选择中风幸存者(入组时间为2006年至2010年)来评估PSD与血糖控制之间的关系。其次,我们使用来自All of Us(2018年至2022年的入学人数)的数据复制了结果。暴露有低、中、高PSD,通过在全基因组水平上2522个与T2DM相关的独立风险变异的多基因风险评分的百分位数(80)来建模(p < 5 × 10-8)。结果是血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)水平,未控制的糖尿病(HbA1c≥7.0%)和难治性糖尿病(尽管抗糖尿病治疗仍未控制)。结果:一期纳入6908例中风幸存者(平均年龄61岁,42%为女性),其中977例(14%)为糖尿病患者。与低PSD患者相比,高PSD患者HbA1c升高0.49 (β = 0.49,标准误差0.03,p-trend p-trend)。讨论:在卒中幸存者中,高PSD与较差的血糖控制相关。进一步的研究应确定精准医疗策略,利用PSD改善脑卒中患者的临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Brain Network Patterns in Patients With Multiple System Atrophy: Spatial Independent Component Analysis Using FDG-PET Data. Previous Antiplatelet Therapy and Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion Treated With Direct Endovascular Therapy. Sequential or Concurrent Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy. IV Tenecteplase Before Thrombectomy Compared With Thrombectomy Alone in Patients With Stroke Due to a Large Vessel Occlusion. Association of Systemic Inflammatory Markers With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Progression: A Community-Based Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1