Fast 3-D Modeling of the LWD Ultradeep Resistivity Measurements Using the Field-Based Secondary-Field Finite Volume Method

IF 8.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2025.3536792
Yazhou Wang;Hongnian Wang;Shouwen Yang;Lei Yu;Bo Chen;Wenxiu Zhang;Changchun Yin
{"title":"Fast 3-D Modeling of the LWD Ultradeep Resistivity Measurements Using the Field-Based Secondary-Field Finite Volume Method","authors":"Yazhou Wang;Hongnian Wang;Shouwen Yang;Lei Yu;Bo Chen;Wenxiu Zhang;Changchun Yin","doi":"10.1109/TGRS.2025.3536792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, to explore the efficiency and precision of the 3-D finite volume method (FVM) for the logging while drilling (LWD) ultradeep resistivity measurements, we compared four different schemes: field-based total-field FVM, coupled potentials total-field FVM, field-based secondary-field FVM, and coupled potentials secondary-field FVM. The fast and accurate discretization of scattered current density in the secondary-field method is another issue we focus on. On the one hand, we improve the discretization accuracy of the scattered current density near the source by extracting the direct waves in the background electric field. On the other hand, based on the dyadic Green’s functions (DGFs) of vector potentials, the number of Sommerfeld integrals in the background electric field is reduced as much as possible through the background field library and interpolation. The numerical results show that the accuracy and stability of the secondary-field method are better than those of the total-field method and the efficiency of the background electric field is greatly improved through the library and interpolation. Based on the premises of the LWD ultradeep resistivity measurements and the direct solver, the accuracy of the field-based and coupled potentials methods is almost the same, however, the field-based method is much more efficient. Overall, we believe that the field-based secondary-field FVM and the direct solver constitute a more efficient modeling scheme with high precision for LWD ultradeep resistivity measurements.","PeriodicalId":13213,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing","volume":"63 ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10858752/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, to explore the efficiency and precision of the 3-D finite volume method (FVM) for the logging while drilling (LWD) ultradeep resistivity measurements, we compared four different schemes: field-based total-field FVM, coupled potentials total-field FVM, field-based secondary-field FVM, and coupled potentials secondary-field FVM. The fast and accurate discretization of scattered current density in the secondary-field method is another issue we focus on. On the one hand, we improve the discretization accuracy of the scattered current density near the source by extracting the direct waves in the background electric field. On the other hand, based on the dyadic Green’s functions (DGFs) of vector potentials, the number of Sommerfeld integrals in the background electric field is reduced as much as possible through the background field library and interpolation. The numerical results show that the accuracy and stability of the secondary-field method are better than those of the total-field method and the efficiency of the background electric field is greatly improved through the library and interpolation. Based on the premises of the LWD ultradeep resistivity measurements and the direct solver, the accuracy of the field-based and coupled potentials methods is almost the same, however, the field-based method is much more efficient. Overall, we believe that the field-based secondary-field FVM and the direct solver constitute a more efficient modeling scheme with high precision for LWD ultradeep resistivity measurements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于现场的二次场有限体积法LWD超深电阻率测量快速三维建模
为了探讨随钻测井(LWD)超深电阻率测量的三维有限体积法(FVM)的效率和精度,我们比较了四种不同的方案:基于现场的全场FVM、耦合电位全场FVM、基于现场的二次场FVM和耦合电位二次场FVM。二次场法中散射电流密度的快速准确离散化是我们关注的另一个问题。一方面,通过提取背景电场中的直波,提高了源附近散射电流密度的离散化精度;另一方面,基于矢量位势的并矢格林函数(DGFs),通过背景场库和插值,尽可能减少背景电场中的Sommerfeld积分次数。数值结果表明,二次场法的精度和稳定性优于全场法,并且通过库和插值大大提高了背景电场的效率。在LWD超深电阻率测量和直接求解的前提下,现场电位法和耦合电位法的精度基本相同,但现场电位法的效率更高。总的来说,我们认为基于现场的二次场FVM和直接求解器构成了一种更有效、精度更高的随钻超深电阻率测量建模方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 工程技术-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
28.00%
发文量
1912
审稿时长
4.0 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (TGRS) is a monthly publication that focuses on the theory, concepts, and techniques of science and engineering as applied to sensing the land, oceans, atmosphere, and space; and the processing, interpretation, and dissemination of this information.
期刊最新文献
Polarization Super-Resolution Remote Sensing Imaging Based on Compressed Sensing and Deep Learning A Non-orthogonal Cartesian Fast BP algorithm for High Squint Spaceborne SAR Imaging NIUIE: Non-uniform Illumination Underwater Image Enhancement via Illumination Component Estimation How Effective Are Time-Series Models for Precipitation Nowcasting? A Comprehensive Benchmark for GNSS-based Precipitation Nowcasting MCDB-Net: Multiview Collaborative Dual-Branch Unmixing Network for Hyperspectral Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1