{"title":"Interplay between Teachers’ Affective Well-Being and Thriving at Work: A Cross-Lagged Study","authors":"Shuhua Wei, Hejuan Ding, Huihui Sun","doi":"10.1007/s10902-025-00863-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Affective well-being, as an important component of well-being, is related to an individual’s mental health and quality of life. Previous studies have found that some psychological variables of employees at work can affect their well-being, but most studies use cross-sectional design, and the exploration of the potential psychological mechanism of the relationship between the two is unclear. This study adopted a longitudinal design to explore the dynamic bidirectional relationship between the thriving at work and affective well-being among the primary and secondary school teachers, and further investigated the mediating mechanism of work-family enrichment between them. Thriving at Work Questionnaire, Work-Family Enrichment Questionnaire, and Affective Well-being Questionnaire are used to conduct a three-wave longitudinal study design which with a sample of 778 teachers at an interval of one year. The results of the cross-lagged analysis showed that: (1) There was an interactive and mutually predictive association between teachers’ affective well-being and thriving at work. (2) The relationship between the positive and negative affective dimensions of teachers’ affective well-being and thriving at work was different; the positive affective dimension rather than the negative affective dimension at the former time point significantly predicted thriving at work at the latter time point; and the thriving at work at the former time point significantly predicted the negative affective dimension rather than the positive affective dimension at the latter time point. (3) Teachers’ work-family enrichment mediated the effect of their thriving at work on their affective well-being, but did not mediate the effect of their affective well-being on their thriving at work. (4) For the relationship between positive affective dimension or negative affective dimension and work-family enrichment and thriving at work, only work-family enrichment was found to play a mediating role in the process of thriving at work affecting positive affective. The study revealed the relationship and mechanism between teachers’ thriving at work, work-family enrichment, and affective well-being, and provided empirical research basis for educational administration and school organizations to explore effective measures to improve the working experience and well-being of teachers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Happiness Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Happiness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00863-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Affective well-being, as an important component of well-being, is related to an individual’s mental health and quality of life. Previous studies have found that some psychological variables of employees at work can affect their well-being, but most studies use cross-sectional design, and the exploration of the potential psychological mechanism of the relationship between the two is unclear. This study adopted a longitudinal design to explore the dynamic bidirectional relationship between the thriving at work and affective well-being among the primary and secondary school teachers, and further investigated the mediating mechanism of work-family enrichment between them. Thriving at Work Questionnaire, Work-Family Enrichment Questionnaire, and Affective Well-being Questionnaire are used to conduct a three-wave longitudinal study design which with a sample of 778 teachers at an interval of one year. The results of the cross-lagged analysis showed that: (1) There was an interactive and mutually predictive association between teachers’ affective well-being and thriving at work. (2) The relationship between the positive and negative affective dimensions of teachers’ affective well-being and thriving at work was different; the positive affective dimension rather than the negative affective dimension at the former time point significantly predicted thriving at work at the latter time point; and the thriving at work at the former time point significantly predicted the negative affective dimension rather than the positive affective dimension at the latter time point. (3) Teachers’ work-family enrichment mediated the effect of their thriving at work on their affective well-being, but did not mediate the effect of their affective well-being on their thriving at work. (4) For the relationship between positive affective dimension or negative affective dimension and work-family enrichment and thriving at work, only work-family enrichment was found to play a mediating role in the process of thriving at work affecting positive affective. The study revealed the relationship and mechanism between teachers’ thriving at work, work-family enrichment, and affective well-being, and provided empirical research basis for educational administration and school organizations to explore effective measures to improve the working experience and well-being of teachers.
期刊介绍:
The international peer-reviewed Journal of Happiness Studies is devoted to theoretical and applied advancements in all areas of well-being research. It covers topics referring to both the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives characterizing well-being studies. The former includes the investigation of cognitive dimensions such as satisfaction with life, and positive affect and emotions. The latter includes the study of constructs and processes related to optimal psychological functioning, such as meaning and purpose in life, character strengths, personal growth, resilience, optimism, hope, and self-determination. In addition to contributions on appraisal of life-as-a-whole, the journal accepts papers investigating these topics in relation to specific domains, such as family, education, physical and mental health, and work.
The journal welcomes high-quality theoretical and empirical submissions in the fields of economics, psychology and sociology, as well as contributions from researchers in the domains of education, medicine, philosophy and other related fields.
The Journal of Happiness Studies provides a forum for three main areas in happiness research: 1) theoretical conceptualizations of well-being, happiness and the good life; 2) empirical investigation of well-being and happiness in different populations, contexts and cultures; 3) methodological advancements and development of new assessment instruments.
The journal addresses the conceptualization, operationalization and measurement of happiness and well-being dimensions, as well as the individual, socio-economic and cultural factors that may interact with them as determinants or outcomes.
Central Questions include, but are not limited to:
Conceptualization:
What meanings are denoted by terms like happiness and well-being?
How do these fit in with broader conceptions of the good life?
Operationalization and Measurement:
Which methods can be used to assess how people feel about life?
How to operationalize a new construct or an understudied dimension in the well-being domain?
What are the best measures for investigating specific well-being related constructs and dimensions?
Prevalence and causality
Do individuals belonging to different populations and cultures vary in their well-being ratings?
How does individual well-being relate to social and economic phenomena (characteristics, circumstances, behavior, events, and policies)?
What are the personal, social and economic determinants and causes of individual well-being dimensions?
Evaluation:
What are the consequences of well-being for individual development and socio-economic progress?
Are individual happiness and well-being worthwhile goals for governments and policy makers?
Does well-being represent a useful parameter to orient planning in physical and mental healthcare, and in public health?
Interdisciplinary studies:
How has the study of happiness developed within and across disciplines?
Can we link philosophical thought and empirical research?
What are the biological correlates of well-being dimensions?