Tumor Cellularity Assessment Using Artificial Intelligence Trained on Immunohistochemistry-Restained Slides Improves Selection of Lung Adenocarcinoma Samples for Molecular Testing.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY American Journal of Pathology Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpath.2025.01.009
Arkadiusz Gertych, Natalia Zurek, Natalia Piaseczna, Kamil Szkaradnik, Yujie Cui, Yi Zhang, Karolina Nurzynska, Bartłomiej Pyciński, Piotr Paul, Artur Bartczak, Ewa Chmielik, Ann E Walts
{"title":"Tumor Cellularity Assessment Using Artificial Intelligence Trained on Immunohistochemistry-Restained Slides Improves Selection of Lung Adenocarcinoma Samples for Molecular Testing.","authors":"Arkadiusz Gertych, Natalia Zurek, Natalia Piaseczna, Kamil Szkaradnik, Yujie Cui, Yi Zhang, Karolina Nurzynska, Bartłomiej Pyciński, Piotr Paul, Artur Bartczak, Ewa Chmielik, Ann E Walts","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpath.2025.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tumor cellularity (TC) in lung adenocarcinoma slides submitted for molecular testing is important in identifying actionable mutations, but absent best practice guidelines yield high interobserver variability in TC assessments. An artificial intelligence (AI)-based pipeline developed to assess TC in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole slide images (WSIs) and in tumor areas (TAs) within WSIs includes a new model (CaBeSt-Net) trained to mask cancer cells, benign epithelial cells, and stroma in H&E WSIs using immunohistochemistry-restained slides, and a model to detect all cell nuclei. High masking accuracy (>91%) by CaBeSt-Net computed using 1024 H&E regions of interest and intraclass correlation coefficient >0.97 assessing TC assessments reliability by one pathologist and AI in 20 test regions of interest supported the pipeline's applicability to TC assessment in 50 study H&E WSIs. Using the pipeline, TCs assessed in TAs and WSIs were compared with those by three pathologists. Reliabilities of these ratings by the pathologists supported by the pipeline were good (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.82, P < 0.0001). The consistency of sample categorizations as inadequate or adequate (TC ≤ 20% cut point) for molecular testing among the pathologists assessing TCs without AI support was moderate in TAs (κ = 0.410, P < 0.0001) and slight in WSIs (κ = 0.132, nonsignificant). With AI support, the consistency was substantial in both WSIs (κ = 0.602, P < 0.0001) and TAs (κ = 0.704, P < 0.0001). By visualizing cancer and measuring TC in the sample, this novel AI-based pipeline assists pathologists in selecting samples for molecular testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7623,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2025.01.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tumor cellularity (TC) in lung adenocarcinoma slides submitted for molecular testing is important in identifying actionable mutations, but absent best practice guidelines yield high interobserver variability in TC assessments. An artificial intelligence (AI)-based pipeline developed to assess TC in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole slide images (WSIs) and in tumor areas (TAs) within WSIs includes a new model (CaBeSt-Net) trained to mask cancer cells, benign epithelial cells, and stroma in H&E WSIs using immunohistochemistry-restained slides, and a model to detect all cell nuclei. High masking accuracy (>91%) by CaBeSt-Net computed using 1024 H&E regions of interest and intraclass correlation coefficient >0.97 assessing TC assessments reliability by one pathologist and AI in 20 test regions of interest supported the pipeline's applicability to TC assessment in 50 study H&E WSIs. Using the pipeline, TCs assessed in TAs and WSIs were compared with those by three pathologists. Reliabilities of these ratings by the pathologists supported by the pipeline were good (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.82, P < 0.0001). The consistency of sample categorizations as inadequate or adequate (TC ≤ 20% cut point) for molecular testing among the pathologists assessing TCs without AI support was moderate in TAs (κ = 0.410, P < 0.0001) and slight in WSIs (κ = 0.132, nonsignificant). With AI support, the consistency was substantial in both WSIs (κ = 0.602, P < 0.0001) and TAs (κ = 0.704, P < 0.0001). By visualizing cancer and measuring TC in the sample, this novel AI-based pipeline assists pathologists in selecting samples for molecular testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Pathology, official journal of the American Society for Investigative Pathology, published by Elsevier, Inc., seeks high-quality original research reports, reviews, and commentaries related to the molecular and cellular basis of disease. The editors will consider basic, translational, and clinical investigations that directly address mechanisms of pathogenesis or provide a foundation for future mechanistic inquiries. Examples of such foundational investigations include data mining, identification of biomarkers, molecular pathology, and discovery research. Foundational studies that incorporate deep learning and artificial intelligence are also welcome. High priority is given to studies of human disease and relevant experimental models using molecular, cellular, and organismal approaches.
期刊最新文献
The Involvement of Mitochondrial Dysfunction during the Development of Adenomyosis. Table of Contents Editorial Board Reviewer Acknowledgment Reinterpreting the True Cause and Nature of Unexpected Liver Lumps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1