Surgical training simulation modalities in minimally invasive surgery: How to achieve evidence-based curricula by translational research

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116197
Philipp Seeger , Nikolaos Kaldis , Felix Nickel , Thilo Hackert , Panagis M. Lykoudis , Anastasios D. Giannou
{"title":"Surgical training simulation modalities in minimally invasive surgery: How to achieve evidence-based curricula by translational research","authors":"Philipp Seeger ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Kaldis ,&nbsp;Felix Nickel ,&nbsp;Thilo Hackert ,&nbsp;Panagis M. Lykoudis ,&nbsp;Anastasios D. Giannou","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Surgery has evolved from a hands-on discipline where skills were acquired via the “learning by doing” principle to a surgical science with attention to patient safety, health care effectiveness and evidence-based research. A variety of simulation modalities have been developed to meet the need for effective resident training. So far, research regarding surgical training for minimally invasive surgery has been extensive but also heterogenous in grade of evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search was conducted to summarize current knowledge about simulation training and to guide research towards evidence-based curricula with translational effects. This was conducted using a variety of terms in PubMed for English articles up to October 2024. Results are presented in a structured narrative review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For virtual reality simulators, there is sound evidence for effective training outcomes. The required instruments for the development of minimally invasive surgery curricula combining different simulation modalities to create a clinical benefit are known and published.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Surgeons are the main creators for minimally invasive surgery training curricula and often follow a hands-on oriented approach that leaves out equally important aspects of assessment, evaluation, and feedback. Further high-quality research that includes available evidence in this field promises to improve patient safety in surgical disciplines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 116197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025000194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Surgery has evolved from a hands-on discipline where skills were acquired via the “learning by doing” principle to a surgical science with attention to patient safety, health care effectiveness and evidence-based research. A variety of simulation modalities have been developed to meet the need for effective resident training. So far, research regarding surgical training for minimally invasive surgery has been extensive but also heterogenous in grade of evidence.

Methods

A literature search was conducted to summarize current knowledge about simulation training and to guide research towards evidence-based curricula with translational effects. This was conducted using a variety of terms in PubMed for English articles up to October 2024. Results are presented in a structured narrative review.

Results

For virtual reality simulators, there is sound evidence for effective training outcomes. The required instruments for the development of minimally invasive surgery curricula combining different simulation modalities to create a clinical benefit are known and published.

Conclusion

Surgeons are the main creators for minimally invasive surgery training curricula and often follow a hands-on oriented approach that leaves out equally important aspects of assessment, evaluation, and feedback. Further high-quality research that includes available evidence in this field promises to improve patient safety in surgical disciplines.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Clinical observation of super tension-relieving suture for wound repair following resection of benign skin tumors in pediatric patients Trends in use of outpatient minimally-invasive adrenalectomy: A population-based analysis Colorectal cancer care equity in underserved communities: Innovative solutions for screening, outreach & capacity in rural Washington “Sucking the trouble” out of troubleshooting wound vacs: Video based curriculum development and implementation in a live tissue model Continuous intraoperative AI monitoring of surgical technical skills using computer vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1