Surgical training simulation modalities in minimally invasive surgery: How to achieve evidence-based curricula by translational research

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116197
Philipp Seeger , Nikolaos Kaldis , Felix Nickel , Thilo Hackert , Panagis M. Lykoudis , Anastasios D. Giannou
{"title":"Surgical training simulation modalities in minimally invasive surgery: How to achieve evidence-based curricula by translational research","authors":"Philipp Seeger ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Kaldis ,&nbsp;Felix Nickel ,&nbsp;Thilo Hackert ,&nbsp;Panagis M. Lykoudis ,&nbsp;Anastasios D. Giannou","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Surgery has evolved from a hands-on discipline where skills were acquired via the “learning by doing” principle to a surgical science with attention to patient safety, health care effectiveness and evidence-based research. A variety of simulation modalities have been developed to meet the need for effective resident training. So far, research regarding surgical training for minimally invasive surgery has been extensive but also heterogenous in grade of evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search was conducted to summarize current knowledge about simulation training and to guide research towards evidence-based curricula with translational effects. This was conducted using a variety of terms in PubMed for English articles up to October 2024. Results are presented in a structured narrative review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For virtual reality simulators, there is sound evidence for effective training outcomes. The required instruments for the development of minimally invasive surgery curricula combining different simulation modalities to create a clinical benefit are known and published.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Surgeons are the main creators for minimally invasive surgery training curricula and often follow a hands-on oriented approach that leaves out equally important aspects of assessment, evaluation, and feedback. Further high-quality research that includes available evidence in this field promises to improve patient safety in surgical disciplines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 116197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025000194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Surgery has evolved from a hands-on discipline where skills were acquired via the “learning by doing” principle to a surgical science with attention to patient safety, health care effectiveness and evidence-based research. A variety of simulation modalities have been developed to meet the need for effective resident training. So far, research regarding surgical training for minimally invasive surgery has been extensive but also heterogenous in grade of evidence.

Methods

A literature search was conducted to summarize current knowledge about simulation training and to guide research towards evidence-based curricula with translational effects. This was conducted using a variety of terms in PubMed for English articles up to October 2024. Results are presented in a structured narrative review.

Results

For virtual reality simulators, there is sound evidence for effective training outcomes. The required instruments for the development of minimally invasive surgery curricula combining different simulation modalities to create a clinical benefit are known and published.

Conclusion

Surgeons are the main creators for minimally invasive surgery training curricula and often follow a hands-on oriented approach that leaves out equally important aspects of assessment, evaluation, and feedback. Further high-quality research that includes available evidence in this field promises to improve patient safety in surgical disciplines.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创外科手术训练模拟模式:如何通过转化研究实现循证课程。
背景:外科已经从一门通过“边做边学”原则获得技能的实践学科发展成为一门关注患者安全、医疗保健有效性和循证研究的外科科学。为了满足住院医生有效培训的需要,已经开发了各种模拟模式。迄今为止,关于微创外科手术训练的研究非常广泛,但证据的等级也参差不齐。方法:通过文献检索,总结目前关于模拟训练的知识,并指导具有翻译效果的循证课程的研究。这是使用PubMed中截至2024年10月的英语文章中的各种术语进行的。结果以结构化的叙述性评论的形式呈现。结果:对于虚拟现实模拟器,有充分的证据证明有效的培训结果。开发微创外科课程所需的仪器,结合不同的模拟模式,以创造临床效益是已知和出版的。结论:外科医生是微创外科培训课程的主要创造者,通常遵循以实践为导向的方法,而忽略了同等重要的评估、评估和反馈。包括该领域现有证据在内的进一步高质量研究有望提高外科学科患者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
From the Editor - in - Chief. Data-driven thresholds for tumor size and nodal involvement in oncocytic thyroid carcinoma: A population-based analysis. Partial left laparoscopic adrenalectomy in four steps (with videos). Erratum to "The Hues of Limb Loss" [Am J Surg 253 (2026) 116678]. Investigating the utility of each MELD edition in predicting liver transplant outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1