Single breast incision for breast conservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy: a systematic review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY ANZ Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1111/ans.19389
Lucy P. Aitchison MD FRACS, Andrew J. Spillane MD FRACS
{"title":"Single breast incision for breast conservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy: a systematic review","authors":"Lucy P. Aitchison MD FRACS,&nbsp;Andrew J. Spillane MD FRACS","doi":"10.1111/ans.19389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Breast conservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy via a single incision allows excision of tumours from all quadrants of the breast, with access to both axillary and internal mammary nodal basins with no additional incisions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review aims to consolidate the current literature on the efficacy, safety, functional and cosmetic outcomes of single-incision breast conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data sources and review methods</h3>\n \n <p>A comprehensive search of Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline and GoogleScholar was conducted from inception to 7th July 2024 for all peer-reviewed articles assessing breast conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy via single incision using PRISMA guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The literature search generated 426 articles. 400 were excluded by abstract review with the remaining 26 articles reviewed in full. An additional three articles were retrieved from review of full article reference lists. 13 articles were excluded, leaving 10 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The technique demonstrated success across all quadrants of the breast. Eight studies documented successful axillary dissection completed via a single incision. Four studies compared the single-incision approach to the conventional two-incision technique. There was no difference in complication rates. The single-incision technique was associated with higher patient satisfaction and reduced post-operative axillary pain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Single-incision breast conservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy is surgically safe and can be feasible for tumours in all quadrants of the breast and is associated with improvement in cosmesis, pain and patient satisfaction. Further studies are required to confirm its long-term oncological safety.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":"95 1-2","pages":"41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ans.19389","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.19389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Breast conservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy via a single incision allows excision of tumours from all quadrants of the breast, with access to both axillary and internal mammary nodal basins with no additional incisions.

Objectives

This systematic review aims to consolidate the current literature on the efficacy, safety, functional and cosmetic outcomes of single-incision breast conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Data sources and review methods

A comprehensive search of Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline and GoogleScholar was conducted from inception to 7th July 2024 for all peer-reviewed articles assessing breast conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy via single incision using PRISMA guidelines.

Results

The literature search generated 426 articles. 400 were excluded by abstract review with the remaining 26 articles reviewed in full. An additional three articles were retrieved from review of full article reference lists. 13 articles were excluded, leaving 10 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The technique demonstrated success across all quadrants of the breast. Eight studies documented successful axillary dissection completed via a single incision. Four studies compared the single-incision approach to the conventional two-incision technique. There was no difference in complication rates. The single-incision technique was associated with higher patient satisfaction and reduced post-operative axillary pain.

Conclusion

Single-incision breast conservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy is surgically safe and can be feasible for tumours in all quadrants of the breast and is associated with improvement in cosmesis, pain and patient satisfaction. Further studies are required to confirm its long-term oncological safety.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单乳房切口保乳手术和前哨淋巴结活检:系统回顾。
背景:乳房保护手术和前哨淋巴结活检通过单个切口可以切除乳房所有象限的肿瘤,无需额外切口即可进入腋窝和乳房内部淋巴结池。目的:本系统综述旨在巩固目前关于单切口保乳手术和前哨淋巴结活检的有效性、安全性、功能和美容结果的文献。数据来源和综述方法:我们对Pubmed、EMBASE、Medline和GoogleScholar进行了全面的检索,从创立到2024年7月7日,所有同行评议的文章都使用PRISMA指南评估保乳手术和单切口前哨淋巴结活检。结果:检索到文献426篇。摘要综述排除400篇,全文综述26篇。从全文参考文献列表中检索到另外三篇文章。13篇文章被排除,剩下10篇符合纳入标准。这项技术在乳房的所有象限上都取得了成功。8项研究记录了通过单个切口成功完成腋窝解剖。四项研究比较了单切口入路和常规双切口入路。并发症发生率无差异。单切口技术与更高的患者满意度和减少术后腋窝疼痛相关。结论:单切口保乳手术和前哨淋巴结活检在手术上是安全的,对于乳腺各象限的肿瘤是可行的,并且与美容、疼痛和患者满意度的改善有关。需要进一步的研究来证实其长期的肿瘤安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Timing Intervals and Frequency of Adenoma Surveillance Colonoscopies in Central Queensland, Australia. An Unexpected Anatomical Trap in Perforated Crohn's Disease. Small Exophytic Gastric Lesions During Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Clinical Dilemma. Re: Quality of Life After Hartmann's and Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure. Advances Towards Gender Equity in Surgery: An Australian Cross-Sectional Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1