Essential newborn care practices in selected public health facilities using observation of 2603 normal deliveries in Uttar Pradesh, India.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017117
Shajy Isac, Bidyadhar Dehury, Ravi Prakash, Nihal Hasan, John Anthony, Banadakoppa Manjappa Ramesh, Prakash P Javalkar, Vasanthakumar Namasivayam, Marissa L Becker, James Blanchard, Ties Boerma
{"title":"Essential newborn care practices in selected public health facilities using observation of 2603 normal deliveries in Uttar Pradesh, India.","authors":"Shajy Isac, Bidyadhar Dehury, Ravi Prakash, Nihal Hasan, John Anthony, Banadakoppa Manjappa Ramesh, Prakash P Javalkar, Vasanthakumar Namasivayam, Marissa L Becker, James Blanchard, Ties Boerma","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Essential newborn care (ENBC) practices are recommended for all births to improve neonatal survival. This paper aims to understand the facility-level variations and factors associated with the essential newborn care practices by providers in higher-level public health facilities in 25 high priority districts (HPDs) of Uttar Pradesh (UP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used observational cross-sectional quantitative data from 48 selected public health facilities (23 district hospitals (DH) and 25 community health centres (CHC)-first referral units (FRU)) implemented in 25 HPDs of UP from February 2020 to May 2021. We defined ENBC practice as both cord care and initiation of breastfeeding within 1 hour of birth were practiced in normal deliveries by the staff nurse. Descriptive analysis was done based on data from 2603 newborns attended by 318 providers. A stratified analysis was done by DH and CHC-FRU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, essential newborn care was practiced among 26.1% of the newborns (26.2% in DH and 35.0% in CHC-FRU). The ENBC practice varied across facilities from 3.0% to 64.1% in DH and from 0% to 91.0% in CHC-FRU. The ENBC practice was about 2.3 times higher in facilities with a high level of skill and knowledge of the providers (39.0%) compared with the facilities with a low level of skill and knowledge (16.9%). Similar patterns of association between providers' skills and knowledge of ENBC practices were observed in DH and CHC-FRU.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Skill and knowledge on ENBC components are significantly associated with the clinical practices of providers, with a high level of variability across facilities. This suggests a focused facility-based assessment and enhancement of the clinical competencies of the providers to improve the quality of care in public health facilities in UP.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Essential newborn care (ENBC) practices are recommended for all births to improve neonatal survival. This paper aims to understand the facility-level variations and factors associated with the essential newborn care practices by providers in higher-level public health facilities in 25 high priority districts (HPDs) of Uttar Pradesh (UP).

Methods: We used observational cross-sectional quantitative data from 48 selected public health facilities (23 district hospitals (DH) and 25 community health centres (CHC)-first referral units (FRU)) implemented in 25 HPDs of UP from February 2020 to May 2021. We defined ENBC practice as both cord care and initiation of breastfeeding within 1 hour of birth were practiced in normal deliveries by the staff nurse. Descriptive analysis was done based on data from 2603 newborns attended by 318 providers. A stratified analysis was done by DH and CHC-FRU.

Results: Overall, essential newborn care was practiced among 26.1% of the newborns (26.2% in DH and 35.0% in CHC-FRU). The ENBC practice varied across facilities from 3.0% to 64.1% in DH and from 0% to 91.0% in CHC-FRU. The ENBC practice was about 2.3 times higher in facilities with a high level of skill and knowledge of the providers (39.0%) compared with the facilities with a low level of skill and knowledge (16.9%). Similar patterns of association between providers' skills and knowledge of ENBC practices were observed in DH and CHC-FRU.

Conclusion: Skill and knowledge on ENBC components are significantly associated with the clinical practices of providers, with a high level of variability across facilities. This suggests a focused facility-based assessment and enhancement of the clinical competencies of the providers to improve the quality of care in public health facilities in UP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过对印度北方邦2603例正常分娩的观察,选定公共卫生机构的基本新生儿护理做法。
新生儿基本护理(ENBC)的做法,建议所有新生儿提高新生儿存活率。本文旨在了解在北方邦(UP)的25个高优先区(HPDs)的高级公共卫生设施提供者的基本新生儿护理实践的设施水平的变化和相关因素。方法:我们使用了从2020年2月至2021年5月在北方邦25个HPDs实施的48个选定的公共卫生设施(23个地区医院(DH)和25个社区卫生中心(CHC)-第一转诊单位(FRU))的观察性横断面定量数据。我们将ENBC实践定义为工作人员护士在正常分娩时进行脐带护理和出生后1小时内开始母乳喂养。描述性分析是基于318名提供者接生的2603名新生儿的数据。DH和CHC-FRU进行了分层分析。结果:总体而言,26.1%的新生儿接受了必要的新生儿护理(DH 26.2%, CHC-FRU 35.0%)。不同设施的ENBC实践从DH的3.0%到64.1%,从CHC-FRU的0%到91.0%不等。服务提供者的技能和知识水平较高的机构(39.0%)采用ENBC做法的比率是服务提供者技能和知识水平较低的机构(16.9%)的2.3倍左右。在DH和CHC-FRU中观察到提供者的技能和ENBC实践知识之间存在类似的关联模式。结论:ENBC组成部分的技能和知识与提供者的临床实践显著相关,各设施之间存在高度可变性。这表明有针对性的基于设施的评估和提高提供者的临床能力,以提高北方邦公共卫生设施的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Understanding motivating and demotivating factors among maternal healthcare professionals in Somalia: a qualitative interview study. Patient, family and clinician priorities for critical care research in Asia and Africa: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership using modified Delphi and nominal group techniques. Implementing effective cataract surgical coverage: a comparative qualitative study in Kenya and Nepal. Forty years later: adult health and non-communicable disease following the 1984-1985 Great Ethiopian Famine - a retrospective cohort study. Embracing complexity and innovation to tackle the social determinants of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1