Determinants of journal impact factors in ‘Nutrition and Dietetics’

IF 6.6 2区医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Clinical nutrition Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2025.01.021

Dileep N. Lobo , Keith R. Neal

{"title":"Determinants of journal impact factors in ‘Nutrition and Dietetics’","authors":"Dileep N. Lobo , Keith R. Neal","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aim</h3><div>The aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyse determinants of the 2023 impact factors (IFs) of journals within the field of ‘Nutrition and Dietetics’.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Clarivate™ Journal Citation Reports™ website (<span><span>https://jcr.clarivate.com/jcr/home</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) was searched on 9 January 2025 for journals with a 2023 IF (published in June 2024) ≥ 6.0 in the field of ‘Nutrition and Dietetics’. Analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were there were 84,040 citations in 2023 to 10,719 works published in 2021 and 2022 in the 12 journals with an IF ≥ 6.0. Median numbers of citations per output were lower than mean citations in all journals. This difference ranged from 0.55 to 3.97. Most outputs (47.5%–79.1 %) had 1–10 citations. The 1538 open access outputs were cited less frequently [mean (95 % CI) 6.98 (6.55–7.40)] than the 9181 subscription outputs [7.99 (7.81–8.16), <em>P</em> < 0.0001]. The 2063 reviews were cited more frequently [8.94 (8.45–9.43)] than the 8656 original articles [7.58 (7.42–7.74), <em>P</em> < 0.0001]. When the highest cited outputs from each journal were excluded, the fall in IFs ranged from 0 to 2.4. The was also the case when the two highest cited outputs were excluded (fall ranged from 0 to 2.7).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This comprehensive analysis of journal IFs has shown that although review articles increase IFs of journals, open access outputs do not. IFs can be distorted by 1 or 2 highly cited outputs and may not reflect the impact of the majority of outputs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"46 ","pages":"Pages 72-79"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561425000226","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyse determinants of the 2023 impact factors (IFs) of journals within the field of ‘Nutrition and Dietetics’.

Methods

The Clarivate™ Journal Citation Reports™ website (https://jcr.clarivate.com/jcr/home) was searched on 9 January 2025 for journals with a 2023 IF (published in June 2024) ≥ 6.0 in the field of ‘Nutrition and Dietetics’. Analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software.

Results

There were there were 84,040 citations in 2023 to 10,719 works published in 2021 and 2022 in the 12 journals with an IF ≥ 6.0. Median numbers of citations per output were lower than mean citations in all journals. This difference ranged from 0.55 to 3.97. Most outputs (47.5%–79.1 %) had 1–10 citations. The 1538 open access outputs were cited less frequently [mean (95 % CI) 6.98 (6.55–7.40)] than the 9181 subscription outputs [7.99 (7.81–8.16), P < 0.0001]. The 2063 reviews were cited more frequently [8.94 (8.45–9.43)] than the 8656 original articles [7.58 (7.42–7.74), P < 0.0001]. When the highest cited outputs from each journal were excluded, the fall in IFs ranged from 0 to 2.4. The was also the case when the two highest cited outputs were excluded (fall ranged from 0 to 2.7).

Conclusion

This comprehensive analysis of journal IFs has shown that although review articles increase IFs of journals, open access outputs do not. IFs can be distorted by 1 or 2 highly cited outputs and may not reflect the impact of the majority of outputs.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学

CiteScore

14.10

自引率

6.30%

发文量

356

审稿时长

28 days

期刊介绍： Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.