What about physician wellness? Impact of a quality improvement intervention.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003078
Pamela Mathura, Isabella Pascheto, Jennifer Ringrose, Gillian Ramsay
{"title":"What about physician wellness? Impact of a quality improvement intervention.","authors":"Pamela Mathura, Isabella Pascheto, Jennifer Ringrose, Gillian Ramsay","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) consultations with general internal medicine (GIM) are required when patients need admission, assistance with safe disposition or evaluation and management of complex or acute medical needs. GIM physicians often balance responsibilities between hospital wards and the ED, which can lead to delayed ED consultations, difficulty balancing workload and potential burn-out. To address this issue, a quality improvement (QI) initiative was trialled, establishing a dedicated GIM ED consultation service to manage these duties independently. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of this intervention on physician wellness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post design was used, with two questionnaires adapted from the validated Mini Z version 2.0 (Zero Burnout Program) Worklife measure for clinicians. These were distributed via Google Forms to collect feedback from participating GIM physicians before and after the intervention. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and the Mini Z outcome measurement scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 physicians completed the surveys. Applying the Mini Z scale, the GIM ED consultation service had no impact on physician well-being or burn-out. There was a minor increase in satisfaction (1 point) and stress levels (2 points), and the working environment worsened slightly (1 point). Comparing preintervention and postintervention survey responses, job satisfaction improved (36%), while reports of 'burn-out' (23%) and 'beginning to burn out' (8%) decreased. Postintervention, physicians reported decreased time for documentation (23%), a perception of a more chaotic work environment (23%) and an increase in work encroaching on personal time (15%) when on the ED consultation service. Additionally, there was a 23% reduction in the likelihood of needing to reduce clinical teaching unit service weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When conducting QI initiatives, consider measuring the wellness of physicians and other healthcare providers. Proactively integrating wellness strategies into interventions requires further exploration which may enhance participant experience and initiative sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) consultations with general internal medicine (GIM) are required when patients need admission, assistance with safe disposition or evaluation and management of complex or acute medical needs. GIM physicians often balance responsibilities between hospital wards and the ED, which can lead to delayed ED consultations, difficulty balancing workload and potential burn-out. To address this issue, a quality improvement (QI) initiative was trialled, establishing a dedicated GIM ED consultation service to manage these duties independently. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of this intervention on physician wellness.

Methods: A pre-post design was used, with two questionnaires adapted from the validated Mini Z version 2.0 (Zero Burnout Program) Worklife measure for clinicians. These were distributed via Google Forms to collect feedback from participating GIM physicians before and after the intervention. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and the Mini Z outcome measurement scale.

Results: 13 physicians completed the surveys. Applying the Mini Z scale, the GIM ED consultation service had no impact on physician well-being or burn-out. There was a minor increase in satisfaction (1 point) and stress levels (2 points), and the working environment worsened slightly (1 point). Comparing preintervention and postintervention survey responses, job satisfaction improved (36%), while reports of 'burn-out' (23%) and 'beginning to burn out' (8%) decreased. Postintervention, physicians reported decreased time for documentation (23%), a perception of a more chaotic work environment (23%) and an increase in work encroaching on personal time (15%) when on the ED consultation service. Additionally, there was a 23% reduction in the likelihood of needing to reduce clinical teaching unit service weeks.

Conclusion: When conducting QI initiatives, consider measuring the wellness of physicians and other healthcare providers. Proactively integrating wellness strategies into interventions requires further exploration which may enhance participant experience and initiative sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
What about physician wellness? Impact of a quality improvement intervention. Continuous individual feedback to nurses at emergency medical dispatch centres: a stepped-wedge, interrupted time series analysis. Impact of introducing transnasal endoscopy on expanding diagnostic endoscopy services. Enhancing patient safety and risk management through clinical pathways in oncology. Avoiding never events in orthopaedics theatres: a quality improvement project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1