Establishing the first ever pediatric procedural sedation clinic in a low-income country: Assessment of the safety and efficacy.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMC Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1186/s12887-024-05351-4
Tigist Bacha, Segni Kejela, Scott A Hagen
{"title":"Establishing the first ever pediatric procedural sedation clinic in a low-income country: Assessment of the safety and efficacy.","authors":"Tigist Bacha, Segni Kejela, Scott A Hagen","doi":"10.1186/s12887-024-05351-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric sedation clinics are rare in low-income countries. Our aim is to describe the establishment of the first-ever pediatric sedation clinic in Ethiopia and provide an assessment of its safety and efficacy over the 5 years since its establishment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-phase approach was undertaken. In the first phase, we analyzed barriers to procedural pain management through repeated focus group discussions with stakeholders. Subsequently, we conducted a modified sedation provider course from the Society for Pediatric Sedation (SPS) with pre and post-training testing to document course effectiveness. Finally, we developed a procedural sedation clinic at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. In the second phase, we prospectively collected outcome data over a 5-year period from patients receiving procedural sedation at the clinic. This included assessing the efficacy of sedation and documenting any adverse events that occurred during the procedures.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>One hundred three providers completed the procedural sedation course. There was a 13.4% improvement in knowledge between baseline and post-course testing. A total of 2,820 patients underwent procedural sedation over the 5-year period from 2016 through 2021, and data selected from 475 (16.8%) patients were analyzed. The most common procedure performed was bone marrow aspiration/biopsy in 384 subjects (80.8%). The most common procedural sedation used was the combination of ketamine and propofol in 60.6%. The mean pain score during the procedure was 0.28/10, which was significantly lower than the pre-procedural pain score (p-value < 0.001). A total of 9 (1.9%) patients had adverse events and there was no mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our experience, development of a safe and effective sedation clinic is possible in resource-limited settings as evidenced by low procedural pain scores, and low adverse events rates. Provider training based on a modification of the SPS course improved overall procedural sedation knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05351-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric sedation clinics are rare in low-income countries. Our aim is to describe the establishment of the first-ever pediatric sedation clinic in Ethiopia and provide an assessment of its safety and efficacy over the 5 years since its establishment.

Methods: A multi-phase approach was undertaken. In the first phase, we analyzed barriers to procedural pain management through repeated focus group discussions with stakeholders. Subsequently, we conducted a modified sedation provider course from the Society for Pediatric Sedation (SPS) with pre and post-training testing to document course effectiveness. Finally, we developed a procedural sedation clinic at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. In the second phase, we prospectively collected outcome data over a 5-year period from patients receiving procedural sedation at the clinic. This included assessing the efficacy of sedation and documenting any adverse events that occurred during the procedures.

Result: One hundred three providers completed the procedural sedation course. There was a 13.4% improvement in knowledge between baseline and post-course testing. A total of 2,820 patients underwent procedural sedation over the 5-year period from 2016 through 2021, and data selected from 475 (16.8%) patients were analyzed. The most common procedure performed was bone marrow aspiration/biopsy in 384 subjects (80.8%). The most common procedural sedation used was the combination of ketamine and propofol in 60.6%. The mean pain score during the procedure was 0.28/10, which was significantly lower than the pre-procedural pain score (p-value < 0.001). A total of 9 (1.9%) patients had adverse events and there was no mortality.

Conclusion: Based on our experience, development of a safe and effective sedation clinic is possible in resource-limited settings as evidenced by low procedural pain scores, and low adverse events rates. Provider training based on a modification of the SPS course improved overall procedural sedation knowledge.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在低收入国家建立首个儿科程序性镇静诊所:安全性和有效性评估。
背景:儿科镇静诊所在低收入国家很少见。我们的目的是描述在埃塞俄比亚建立的第一个儿科镇静诊所,并提供自其成立以来5年的安全性和有效性的评估。方法:采用多阶段方法。在第一阶段,我们通过与利益相关者的反复焦点小组讨论,分析了程序性疼痛管理的障碍。随后,我们进行了一项由儿科镇静学会(SPS)提供的经过修改的镇静提供者课程,并进行了培训前和培训后测试,以证明课程的有效性。最后,我们在提库尔安贝萨专科医院建立了一个程序性镇静诊所。在第二阶段,我们前瞻性地收集了在诊所接受程序性镇静治疗的患者5年期间的结果数据。这包括评估镇静的效果和记录手术过程中发生的任何不良事件。结果:103名提供者完成了程序性镇静疗程。在基线和课程后测试之间,知识提高了13.4%。在2016年至2021年的5年期间,共有2820名患者接受了程序性镇静治疗,并对475名(16.8%)患者的数据进行了分析。最常见的手术是骨髓穿刺/活检,384例(80.8%)。最常见的程序性镇静是氯胺酮和异丙酚的联合使用(60.6%)。手术过程中的平均疼痛评分为0.28/10,明显低于手术前的疼痛评分(p值)。结论:根据我们的经验,在资源有限的情况下,通过低手术疼痛评分和低不良事件发生率,可以建立一个安全有效的镇静诊所。基于SPS课程修改的提供者培训提高了整体程序性镇静知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of oral streptococci and glucosyltransferase genes in mother-child pairs: a cross-sectional study in Turkish families. Blood pressure trajectories in extreme preterm infants with and without bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a longitudinal cohort study. Computer-based cognitive training for pediatric cancer survivors: a systematic review. Role of Th17/Treg immune balance in assessment of mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia severity and its discriminatory value for asthma in children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Clinicopathologic patterns and treatment outcomes of pediatric classic hodgkin lymphoma in Ethiopian newly opened cancer treatment centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1